Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 | 3 
PolicyGuy
1821 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1772

ID Verified
Lifetime subscriber

  #3318058 8-Dec-2024 16:55
Send private message

Asteros:

 

I personally don't see much difference between airlines in Economy class. I would like to be proven wrong, but the idea to fly alternative airlines based on price or timetable makes sense.

 

If you're a smallish person, then you may not notice much difference. If you're more generously proportioned, or sitting next to someone who's large(ish), you definitely will notice. 

 

Apart from JAL & ANA, as far as I know just about all airlines - including Air NZ - run their economy class seating in B787s 9-abreast, when JAL & ANA run 8-abreast as Boeing originally designed. Most airlines (incl AirNZ) also run economy class in their B777s as 10-abreast, instead of the 9-abreat that Boeing originally designed. The result is that the seats and aisles are 17" (~43cm) wide, or "pretty bloody skinny" as we Self Loading Cargo say.

 

It is possible to avoid this problem: you could fly Premium Economy but while comfy, this is pretty expensive, or you could just choose an airline running Airbus aircraft.
This is not an anti-Boeing thing, it's just that the Airbus aircraft are designed to be less squeezy in Economy:
  * The A330 & A340 are B787 competitors but run 8-abreast 18" (~45cm) seats
  * The A350 is a B787 / B777 competitor but runs 9-abreast 18" (~45cm) seats. Also the A350 is much quieter for passengers than the B777.
  * The incomparable A380 runs 10-abreast but the seats are a relatively luxurious 19" (~48cm) wide, and the economy class cabin is the most spacious and the quietest you can fly in.

 

You may not think that a couple of centimetres extra seat width would make much difference, but it actually does.




Asteros
363 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 189


  #3318060 8-Dec-2024 17:09
Send private message

Yes I'm wrong. Seat width is important, so there are differences in Economy between airlines and planes.

 

One thing though, the Emirates A380 is 18" wide in Economy based on Aerolopa

 

https://www.aerolopa.com/ek

 

https://seatmaps.com/airlines/ek-emirates/airbus-a380/

 

https://www.seatguru.com/airlines/Emirates_Airlines/Emirates_Airlines_Airbus_A380.php

 

 


Tinkerisk
4800 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3660


  #3318063 8-Dec-2024 17:27
Send private message

I don't know what you are comparing (I do 😉), but for me the front LH seat has always been the most comfortable and service friendly. The only thing was that the „entertainment system“ was not as good as in the seats all behind me and the choice of „drinks“ was somewhat limited. 😁





     

  • Qui nihil scit, omnia credere debet.
  • Firewalls do NOT stop dragons.
  • In effect we have everything to hide from someone, and no idea who someone is.



Dingbatt
6804 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3694

Lifetime subscriber

  #3318066 8-Dec-2024 17:38
Send private message

Tinkerisk:

 

I don't know what you are comparing (I do 😉), but for me the front LH seat has always been the most comfortable and service friendly. The only thing was that the „entertainment system“ was not as good as in the seats all behind me and the choice of „drinks“ was somewhat limited. 😁

 

 

Being paid to be there and having a bunk to sleep in probably doesn’t hurt the experience either!





“We’ve arranged a society based on science and technology, in which nobody understands anything about science technology. Carl Sagan 1996


SomeoneSomewhere
1882 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1086

Lifetime subscriber

  #3318068 8-Dec-2024 17:50
Send private message

PolicyGuy:

 

Asteros:

 

I personally don't see much difference between airlines in Economy class. I would like to be proven wrong, but the idea to fly alternative airlines based on price or timetable makes sense.

 

If you're a smallish person, then you may not notice much difference. If you're more generously proportioned, or sitting next to someone who's large(ish), you definitely will notice. 

 

Apart from JAL & ANA, as far as I know just about all airlines - including Air NZ - run their economy class seating in B787s 9-abreast, when JAL & ANA run 8-abreast as Boeing originally designed. Most airlines (incl AirNZ) also run economy class in their B777s as 10-abreast, instead of the 9-abreat that Boeing originally designed. The result is that the seats and aisles are 17" (~43cm) wide, or "pretty bloody skinny" as we Self Loading Cargo say.

 

It is possible to avoid this problem: you could fly Premium Economy but while comfy, this is pretty expensive, or you could just choose an airline running Airbus aircraft.
This is not an anti-Boeing thing, it's just that the Airbus aircraft are designed to be less squeezy in Economy:
  * The A330 & A340 are B787 competitors but run 8-abreast 18" (~45cm) seats
  * The A350 is a B787 / B777 competitor but runs 9-abreast 18" (~45cm) seats. Also the A350 is much quieter for passengers than the B777.
  * The incomparable A380 runs 10-abreast but the seats are a relatively luxurious 19" (~48cm) wide, and the economy class cabin is the most spacious and the quietest you can fly in.

 

You may not think that a couple of centimetres extra seat width would make much difference, but it actually does.

 

 

 

 

While this is true for the majority of operators, there are a few exceptions running 9-abreast in A330/A340s, 10 abreast in A350s, and also 8-abreast in 767s. These are a very tight squeeze, and are generally found in super-economy charter-type carriers like FrenchBee and IIRC Thomson?

 

 

 

A320s are also very slightly wider than 737s. 


PolicyGuy
1821 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1772

ID Verified
Lifetime subscriber

  #3318186 8-Dec-2024 20:41
Send private message

SomeoneSomewhere:

 

While this is true for the majority of operators, there are a few exceptions running 9-abreast in A330/A340s, 10 abreast in A350s, and also 8-abreast in 767s. These are a very tight squeeze, and are generally found in super-economy charter-type carriers like FrenchBee and IIRC Thomson?

 

A320s are also very slightly wider than 737s. 

 

 

That is true, but I thought it unlikely that GZ users would have the misfortune to come across these airlines.

 

And indeed, the A320 economy seat is by design slightly (maybe 2cm?) wider and somewhat less uncomfortable that the B737, whose fuselage cross section goes back to the B707 and the dawn of the jet age in the 1950s, when people were significantly smaller than today


 
 
 

Shop now on AliExpress (affiliate link).
SomeoneSomewhere
1882 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1086

Lifetime subscriber

  #3318198 8-Dec-2024 21:27
Send private message

I think it's less that and more that 707s and 737s were originally developed as five-abreast aircraft, with six-abreast being a 'super crammed extra economy' for really short routes.


Tinkerisk
4800 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3660


  #3318226 9-Dec-2024 03:44
Send private message

Dingbatt:

 

Being paid to be there and having a bunk to sleep in probably doesn’t hurt the experience either!

 

 

Sleeping in the crew rest compartment was out of the question (with rare exceptions, i.e. route proving), as these were test flights - not scheduled or charter flights. 😉





     

  • Qui nihil scit, omnia credere debet.
  • Firewalls do NOT stop dragons.
  • In effect we have everything to hide from someone, and no idea who someone is.

chatterbox
204 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 108


  #3318993 11-Dec-2024 00:26
Send private message

I'm not seeing any Sky nest 🤔


Dingbatt
6804 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3694

Lifetime subscriber

  #3319011 11-Dec-2024 06:57
Send private message

I’m pretty sure the sky nests are being fitted elsewhere, possibly NZ?





“We’ve arranged a society based on science and technology, in which nobody understands anything about science technology. Carl Sagan 1996


1 | 2 | 3 
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic








Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.