|
|
|
He will be absolutely beside himself they made the front cover of Time. IT'S SO UNFAIR!! TRUMP'S DONE SOOOO MUCH!! HE SHOULD GET A NOBEL PEACE PRIZE!!
/sarcasm :)
Rikkitic:
Sideface:
Donald will be seriously pissed off. 🙂
Now for the Nobel prize.
You folks know the lawsuit the Texas AG started against other states' procedures trying to overturn their results?
Yeah, the FBI issued a subpoena to AG Ken Paxton, so he's possibly trying to get on Trump's good side and in return get a pardon...
Referral links: Quic Broadband (free setup code: R587125ERQ6VE) | Samsung | AliExpress | Wise | Sharesies
Support Geekzone by subscribing (browse ads-free), or making a one-off or recurring donation through PressPatron.
freitasm:
You folks know the lawsuit the Texas AG started against other states' procedures trying to overturn their results?
Yeah, the FBI issued a subpoena to AG Ken Paxton, so he's possibly trying to get on Trump's good side and in return get a pardon...
And the Republican Party Swamp just keeps getting bigger, deeper and murkier.
Whilst the difficult we can do immediately, the impossible takes a bit longer. However, miracles you will have to wait for.
FineWine: And the Republican Party Swamp just keeps getting bigger, deeper and murkier.
Enormous inertia built into the American government is a major contributor to the swamp.
NZ voters can remove the entire government every three years.
American voter needs a much longer attention span. President, Congress, Senate, State Congress, State Senate..
The Washington Post - Coronavirus Updates - White House threatens FDA chief over vaccine
today
President Trump's chief of staff has told Food and Drug Administration commissioner Stephen Hahn to resign unless the agency clears the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine by the end of today, putting political pressure on what is supposed to be a scientific process and potentially weakening public trust in the immunization program.
The threat, accompanied by a tweet from Trump attacking the FDA as a “slow turtle,” is also somewhat baffling because regulators were already on the cusp of authorizing the vaccine.
An advisory committee voted overwhelmingly to recommend the FDA do so on Thursday, and the agency announced early this morning that it had already informed Pfizer it would “rapidly work” toward authorization.
“The important thing is apparently that Trump gets credit for pushing things along,” The Post's Aaron Blake wrote in an analysis, which warned that a quarter of Americans polled in one survey already doubt the vaccine's safety and efficacy.
“Demanding that this happens now … is pretty much the opposite of what health officials want.” ...
Sideface
Anyone know if the Pumpkin's Pardons can be overturned? I'd love to see all those festering anuses* returned to custody, especially Stone. That creep really gives me the runs.
(*You may prefer 'festering ani')
Trump crowned? No faux King way!
CNN reporting that supreme court has rejected Texas lawsuit.
Plesse igmore amd axxept applogies in adbance fir anu typos
Rikkitic: CNN reporting that supreme court has rejected Texas lawsuit.
The headline says it all ...
The Washington Post - Supreme Court dismisses bid led by Texas attorney general to overturn the presidential election results, blocking Trump’s legal path to reverse his loss
breaking
The Supreme Court on Friday dismissed a long-shot bid by President Trump and the state of Texas to overturn the results in four states won by Democrat Joe Biden, blocking the president’s legal path to reverse his reelection loss.
The court’s unsigned order was short: “Texas has not demonstrated a judicially cognizable interest in the manner in which another state conducts its elections. All other pending motions are dismissed as moot.” ...
Trump, who has appointed three of the court’s nine members, has long viewed the Supreme Court as something of an ace-in-the-hole, and called for the justices to display “courage” and rescue him in post-election litigation.
and ... The New York Times - Supreme Court Rejects Texas Suit Seeking to Subvert Election

Sideface
Rikkitic:
CNN reporting that supreme court has rejected Texas lawsuit.
Anyone know what the count was? I hope it was 9-0 against. Especially by Trumps 3 conservative appointments, he is going to be so ropeable. That dummy/pacifier is going to be spat long and hard 😀
PS: His lawyers wont get their Presidential Pardons now.
Whilst the difficult we can do immediately, the impossible takes a bit longer. However, miracles you will have to wait for.
No-one actually 'voted' against it, as such. Two of the conservative justices, not recent ones, stated that they thought the case should be heard as a matter of principle, but then rejected, if I understand correctly. Not sure I do.
Plesse igmore amd axxept applogies in adbance fir anu typos
Rikkitic: No-one actually 'voted' against it, as such. Two of the conservative justices, not recent ones, stated that they thought the case should be heard as a matter of principle, but then rejected ...
EDIT (updated quote)
The New York Times - Supreme Court Rejects Texas Suit Seeking to Subvert Election
breaking
Friday’s order was not quite unanimous.
Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr., joined by Justice Clarence Thomas, issued a brief statement on a technical point. *
But it was nonetheless a comprehensive rebuke to Mr. Trump and his allies.
It was plain that the justices had no patience for Texas’ attempt to enlist the court in an effort to tell other states how to run their elections.
The majority [7 of 9 justices] ruled that Texas could not file its lawsuit at all. ...
* Both of these conservative justices were nominated by President George W. Bush. None of Trump's three "new" justices supported the lawsuit.
Sideface
geekIT:Anyone know if the Pumpkin's Pardons can be overturned?
|
|
|