![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Plastics not climate change??????? The impact plastics are having on the largest ecosystem on the planet is very much climate change.
MikeB4:
Plastics not climate change??????? The impact plastics are having on the largest ecosystem on the planet is very much climate change.
Plastics don't overheat the planet
So is Chloe Swarbrick’s “Okay Boomer” comment ageist?
Before answering, replace the word “Boomer” with one that has racial, gender, religious, etc undertones that categorises someone for the purpose of denigration. Maybe she just playing ‘us and them’ politics. Not what you should expect from a member of an ‘all inclusive’ political party.
“We’ve arranged a society based on science and technology, in which nobody understands anything about science technology. Carl Sagan 1996
Dingbatt:
So is Chloe Swarbrick’s “Okay Boomer” comment ageist?
Before answering, replace the word “Boomer” with one that has racial, gender, religious, etc undertones that categorises someone for the purpose of denigration. Maybe she just playing ‘us and them’ politics. Not what you should expect from a member of an ‘all inclusive’ political party.
Yes. Nice opinion piece here today, which shows this to be the opposite of what you would assume.
https://www.stuff.co.nz/business/opinion-analysis/117259704/ok-kids--this-boomer-has-had-enough
"I worry that those who deploy "OK Boomer" are putting themselves down and signalling their own impotence."
Yes, this is from one who helps run our country. Where are you with Climate Change Green Party???? I see a lot of yakking and nothing to show for it
tdgeek:MikeB4:Plastics not climate change??????? The impact plastics are having on the largest ecosystem on the planet is very much climate change.
Plastics don't overheat the planet
Dingbatt:So is Chloe Swarbrick’s “Okay Boomer” comment ageist?
Before answering, replace the word “Boomer” with one that has racial, gender, religious, etc undertones that categorises someone for the purpose of denigration. Maybe she just playing ‘us and them’ politics. Not what you should expect from a member of an ‘all inclusive’ political party.
Dingbatt:
So is Chloe Swarbrick’s “Okay Boomer” comment ageist?
Before answering, replace the word “Boomer” with one that has racial, gender, religious, etc undertones that categorises someone for the purpose of denigration. Maybe she just playing ‘us and them’ politics. Not what you should expect from a member of an ‘all inclusive’ political party.
Two types in the Green Party. People who care about the environment, and activists
Dingbatt:
So is Chloe Swarbrick’s “Okay Boomer” comment ageist?
Before answering, replace the word “Boomer” with one that has racial, gender, religious, etc undertones that categorises someone for the purpose of denigration. Maybe she just playing ‘us and them’ politics. Not what you should expect from a member of an ‘all inclusive’ political party.
Definitely ageist and an attempt at putting down people older than herself. She is just another activist who only cares about herself.
Dingbatt:
So is Chloe Swarbrick’s “Okay Boomer” comment ageist?
Before answering, replace the word “Boomer” with one that has racial, gender, religious, etc undertones that categorises someone for the purpose of denigration. Maybe she just playing ‘us and them’ politics. Not what you should expect from a member of an ‘all inclusive’ political party.
It is ageist but as pejoratives go, it seems pretty mild to me. Unlike some other words used for purposes of racial, gender, or religious denigration, which cause real hurt and can incite violence. As an officially elderly person (thus giving me a right to speak on the subject), I am not bothered by it at all. I would be very bothered if I was denied a job or other benefit solely because of my age, but getting indignant about being called an old fart seems pretty precious to me.
Plesse igmore amd axxept applogies in adbance fir anu typos
Mahon:
Dingbatt:
So is Chloe Swarbrick’s “Okay Boomer” comment ageist?
Before answering, replace the word “Boomer” with one that has racial, gender, religious, etc undertones that categorises someone for the purpose of denigration. Maybe she just playing ‘us and them’ politics. Not what you should expect from a member of an ‘all inclusive’ political party.
Definitely ageist and an attempt at putting down people older than herself. She is just another activist who only cares about herself.
She is off course younger and wiser, and I guess everyone else who is older is to blame.
Rikkitic:
Dingbatt:
So is Chloe Swarbrick’s “Okay Boomer” comment ageist?
Before answering, replace the word “Boomer” with one that has racial, gender, religious, etc undertones that categorises someone for the purpose of denigration. Maybe she just playing ‘us and them’ politics. Not what you should expect from a member of an ‘all inclusive’ political party.
It is ageist but as pejoratives go, it seems pretty mild to me. Unlike some other words used for purposes of racial, gender, or religious denigration, which cause real hurt and can incite violence. As an officially elderly person (thus giving me a right to speak on the subject), I am not bothered by it at all. I would be very bothered if I was denied a job or other benefit solely because of my age, but getting indignant about being called an old fart seems pretty precious to me.
I think most old farts know more then she will ever know, as they grew up, in real time, with these issues. So many tale a genuine interest rtaher than grandstanding. But come in later with your microphone and tell everyone as you know better lol
Heather says it rather well....not that I always agree with her verbal rants...
Mahon:
Heather says it rather well....not that I always agree with her verbal rants...
Too busy to read, Im getting up to speed with the Kardashians, and Facebook. The 15yo finished her NCEA exam early today, must have had an Instagram section :-)
Mahon:
Heather says it rather well....not that I always agree with her verbal rants...
"Because at least boomers know what hard work is, unlike my soft-handed, entitled and whingeing fellow millennials."
My eyes have rolled so far back into my head that I'm pretty sure they aren't coming back.
GV27:
Mahon:
Heather says it rather well....not that I always agree with her verbal rants...
"Because at least boomers know what hard work is, unlike my soft-handed, entitled and whingeing fellow millennials."
My eyes have rolled so far back into my head that I'm pretty sure they aren't coming back.
Similar to that boomers, once born, plotted their devious plans to be rich, and to scuttle future generations? Its consistent seeing them classed as selfish and evil. That's also worth a hefty roll
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |