Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.
To post in this sub-forum you must have made 100 posts or have Trust status or have completed our ID Verification

Filter this topic showing only the reply marked as answer View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | ... | 2121 | 2122 | 2123 | 2124 | 2125 | 2126 | 2127 | 2128 | 2129 | 2130 | 2131 | ... | 2482
kingdragonfly
11996 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 12893

Subscriber

  #3275787 27-Aug-2024 13:45
Send private message quote this post

Sideface:




To conclude Trump's thought.

...Kamala Harris, who wants "THE": Thriving, Hope and Elation.

SaltyNZ
8874 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 9566

Trusted
2degrees
Lifetime subscriber

  #3275788 27-Aug-2024 13:49
Send private message quote this post

Sideface:

 

 

geekIT:  Trump deletes error-strewn early morning social media post about the ‘Powerfulnnz Border’

 

 

Exhibit A:

 

 

 

 

 

brb gotta go get a cup of Strong and Powerfulnnz covfefe





iPad Pro 11" + iPhone 15 Pro Max + 2degrees 4tw!

 

These comments are my own and do not represent the opinions of 2degrees.


kingdragonfly
11996 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 12893

Subscriber

  #3275791 27-Aug-2024 14:20
Send private message quote this post

MSNBC: Jack Smith could win his appeal, but still have to deal with Judge Cannon

Special counsel Jack Smith filed his brief to the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on Monday, urging the court to reverse U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon’s dismissal of the classified documents case. The Justice Department has a decent chance of prevailing, but reviving the case alone won’t solve a continuing challenge Smith would still face: Cannon herself.

In her latest avant-garde move in the former president’s favor, the Trump appointee tossed the federal case last month on the grounds that Smith was unlawfully appointed and funded. In his appellate brief, the special counsel highlights how much of an outlier Cannon’s ruling was. Noting the longtime acceptance of special counsels, the government wrote that Cannon’s “contrary view conflicts with an otherwise unbroken course of decisions, including by the Supreme Court, that the Attorney General has such authority, and it is at odds with widespread and longstanding appointment practices in the Department of Justice and across the government.”

Reviving the case alone won’t solve a continuing challenge Smith would still face: Cannon herself.

Recall that, before the former president was charged in this case, the 11th Circuit had already rebuked Cannon’s eccentrically Trump-friendly handling of litigation stemming from the Mar-a-Lago search warrant in 2022. That raised questions when Cannon was randomly assigned to the criminal case last year about whether she could be removed. The short answer is that, as I’ve written before during this saga, it’s more difficult to reassign a judge than you might think, and we shouldn’t assume that that will happen here, absent the judge doing something even more outlandish than she has to date.

Smith’s brief didn’t indicate his intention to seek a new judge. That doesn’t mean that the appeals court couldn’t still remove her while reversing her, but there’s reason to not expect that here.

One thing to keep in mind is how Cannon arrived at her ruling. She cited, among other things, Justice Clarence Thomas’ concurring opinion in the Trump immunity case, in which the Republican appointee went out of his way to question Smith’s appointment.
...

geekIT
2474 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3799


  #3275793 27-Aug-2024 14:29
Send private message quote this post

He'll just have to rely on his new VP to do his Tweets...

 





Trump crowned? No faux King way!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Sideface
9652 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 15607

Trusted
DR
Lifetime subscriber

  #3275970 28-Aug-2024 08:28
Send private message quote this post

The Washington Post - New indictment filed against Trump in federal Jan. 6 case

 

breaking !

 


Special counsel Jack Smith has filed a new indictment of Donald Trump in the case involving an alleged conspiracy to obstruct the results of the 2020 election - a move that comes in the wake of an historic Supreme Court ruling granting broad immunity to presidents for official acts, and just before an election period window was about to close on filing such charges.

 

The new indictment comes just 10 days before a Justice Department policy known as “the 60-day rule” would take effect forestalling any new filing of charges against the former president and current presidential candidate.

 

This is a developing story. It will be updated. 

 

 

EDIT   and ....

 

The NY Times - Special Counsel Revises Trump Election Indictment to Address Immunity Ruling

 

breaking

 


Federal prosecutors on Tuesday issued a revised version of an indictment accusing former President Donald J. Trump of plotting to overturn the 2020 election, stripping out some charges in order to help it survive the Supreme Court’s recent ruling granting former presidents broad immunity for official acts in office. ...

 

Perhaps the most significant change between the 36-page superseding indictment and the original 45-page indictment was that Mr. Smith’s deputies removed all the allegations concerning Mr. Trump’s attempts to strong-arm the Justice Department into supporting his false claims that the election had been rigged against him.

 

 

 





Sideface


geekIT
2474 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3799


  #3276339 28-Aug-2024 16:47
Send private message quote this post




Trump crowned? No faux King way!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


quickymart
14943 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 13962

ID Verified

  #3276345 28-Aug-2024 17:07
Send private message quote this post

Funny how the orange buffoon just conveniently "forgets" all the nasty stuff anyone has said about him previously if he needs/wants something from them 🙄

 

Would love to see how James would respond if asked "didn't you once call Trump America's Hitler?" - would be great to see him try and squirm his way out of that one!


Paul1977
5171 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2192


  #3276548 29-Aug-2024 09:06
Send private message quote this post

geekIT:

 

 

 

https://www.reddit.com/r/pics/comments/1ezqtrr/antitrump_billboards_from_around_the_us/

 

Real anti-Trump billboards...

 

 

But wouldn't it be refreshing if it was about policy? Both sides are as bad as each other in that regard, spending most of their time and money vilifying the opponent and pointing out hypocrisy rather than explaining actual policy. They're politicians, they're all hypocrites and liars - it's in the job description. These sorts of billboards don't change anyone's minds.


Rikkitic
Awrrr
19071 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 16319

Lifetime subscriber

  #3276556 29-Aug-2024 09:25
Send private message quote this post

Paul1977:

 

But wouldn't it be refreshing if it was about policy? Both sides are as bad as each other in that regard, spending most of their time and money vilifying the opponent and pointing out hypocrisy rather than explaining actual policy. They're politicians, they're all hypocrites and liars - it's in the job description. These sorts of billboards don't change anyone's minds.

 

 

Sit-downs, debates, town halls and interviews are about policy. Billboards are just about zingers.

 

 





Plesse igmore amd axxept applogies in adbance fir anu typos

 


 


Sideface
9652 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 15607

Trusted
DR
Lifetime subscriber

  #3276562 29-Aug-2024 09:44
Send private message quote this post



 

The NY Times - Opinion - Jack Smith’s New Case Against Trump Is Much Stronger Than His Old One

 


 ... I disagree strongly with the Supreme Court’s immunity ruling, but to the extent there is any silver lining in that dark constitutional cloud, it’s that for Smith, less is truly more. ...

 

Smith’s first indictment would have given Trump room to argue that he was doing nothing more than using the levers of government power to investigate election fraud, a classic function of the Department of Justice. ...

 

Trump’s fake electors scheme, by contrast, was a campaign function, not an exercise of presidential power. ...

 

There was never a credible argument for fake electors. And by conspiring to submit fraudulent electoral votes, Trump’s conduct fits squarely within precedent for federal offenses.

 

 

Trump's four alleged crimes are:

 

1. Conspiracy to defraud the U.S. government (to “overturn the legitimate results of the 2020 presidential election”)

 

2. Conspiracy to obstruct an official proceeding (the congressional certification of election results)

 

3. Obstruction of an official proceeding (by trying to get Congress to accept fake electors)

 

4. Conspiracy against rights (specifically to “injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate” people from having their vote be counted)





Sideface


SaltyNZ
8874 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 9566

Trusted
2degrees
Lifetime subscriber

  #3276586 29-Aug-2024 09:57
Send private message quote this post

Sideface:

 

Trump's four alleged crimes are:

 

1. Conspiracy to defraud the U.S. government (to “overturn the legitimate results of the 2020 presidential election”)

 

2. Conspiracy to obstruct an official proceeding (the congressional certification of election results)

 

3. Obstruction of an official proceeding (by trying to get Congress to accept fake electors)

 

4. Conspiracy against rights (specifically to “injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate” people from having their vote be counted)

 

 

 

 

The important point to note here is that Smith convened a brand new Grand Jury who were not shown the evidence that may possibly be tainted after the Supreme Court immunity ruling - and they still indicted Trump on the same charges as before. This leaves the Trump camp with little room to wriggle out of this on the basis of immunity.





iPad Pro 11" + iPhone 15 Pro Max + 2degrees 4tw!

 

These comments are my own and do not represent the opinions of 2degrees.


Paul1977
5171 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2192


  #3276714 29-Aug-2024 12:34
Send private message quote this post

Rikkitic:

 

Paul1977:

 

But wouldn't it be refreshing if it was about policy? Both sides are as bad as each other in that regard, spending most of their time and money vilifying the opponent and pointing out hypocrisy rather than explaining actual policy. They're politicians, they're all hypocrites and liars - it's in the job description. These sorts of billboards don't change anyone's minds.

 

 

Sit-downs, debates, town halls and interviews are about policy. Billboards are just about zingers.

 

 

Debates not so much.


ezbee
2659 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3105


  #3276735 29-Aug-2024 14:53
Send private message quote this post


Well the Billboard is quite mild, and its what the boy said.
J.D said much more inflamitory things about Trump.

 

Compared with Trumps long track record, pretty mild stuff compared with what you could put.

 

Policy, 

 

Yeh well there is the rub.
You can promise a magical healthcare scheme that costs little (which we still have no detail of), solve every infrastructure problem without spend, build massive walls, solve Middle East problem for good, stock market will charge on to never ending highs etc.
 
Trump by actions even 'before the election before last' has shown a lack of Honesty and Ethics even on a basic level in Trump University and many other business and personal dealings. 
Add what has happend since, and its fair to question.

 

While no one is 'pure' you expect some puffery.
Without a basic level of Ethics and Honesty, Policy is worth little.
Character is foundation the rest is built on.

 

Otherwise are you just voting in the Elisabeth Holmes (Theranos) of politics. 


msukiwi
2443 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2126

Lifetime subscriber

  #3276748 29-Aug-2024 15:58
Send private message quote this post

Something on the lighter side:

 

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/z1gRn-u-mU8

 

 


kingdragonfly
11996 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 12893

Subscriber

  #3276912 30-Aug-2024 08:25
Send private message quote this post

The Guardian: US army confirms Arlington cemetery worker ‘pushed aside’ by Trump staff

US army officials issued a strongly worded rebuke of Donald Trump’s campaign on Thursday as they confirmed a worker at Arlington national cemetery was “abruptly pushed aside” during an altercation with members of the former president’s staff.

The statement was the strongest official criticism yet of Trump’s controversial visit in which he gave a thumbs-up over graves as a photo opportunity and there was an alleged physical assault by two of his staffers on the army official. It came as outrage continued to mount from veterans and families of some of the service members buried there.

Adding to pressure on the election campaign of the Republican presidential nominee was the army’s revelation that Trump’s team was explicitly told in advance by a defense department official that taking photographs and video footage at the cemetery breached federal law.

The campaign ignored the warning and filmed anyway, sparking a confrontation
...

1 | ... | 2121 | 2122 | 2123 | 2124 | 2125 | 2126 | 2127 | 2128 | 2129 | 2130 | 2131 | ... | 2482
Filter this topic showing only the reply marked as answer View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic


Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.