|
|
|
quickymart:
Nothing about lowering grocery prices then? But renaming the Gulf of Mexico or a mountain? Absolute, top-shelf, grade A priority 🙄
Trumperica!? 😁

You think that menace cares about victims? All he cares about is letting the worst of society back into it. I swear he's doing it to stir up fear so that he can tighten his authoritarian grip.
Dictator on day one? I'm pretty sure he intends to be a dictator for the rest of his life. Him, and his Project 2025 backers. Margaret Attwood must be aghast at seeing her book used as an instruction manual.
Looks like he has, in a typical piece of ignorant stupidity, taken on the harder-to-defend case of targeting biological sex rather than gender as a social construct. There's a whole pile of different conditions collected under the general term intersex which don't fit either of the above, or fit both of the above.
Ge0rge: Trump's Executive order stating there are only two sexes has these two specific definitions:
(d) “Female” means a person belonging, at conception, to the sex that produces the large reproductive cell.
(e) “Male” means a person belonging, at conception, to the sex that produces the small reproductive cell.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/why-trump-could-regret-jan-100000706.html
For starters, Trump’s blanket pardon is unpopular, and it could help to frame early perceptions of his return to the White House. After the election, multiple polls reported that somewhere around two-thirds of Americans opposed Trump’s promise to pardon the Jan. 6 defendants, including about two-thirds of independents.
I hope those totally unnecessary pardons hang like an albatross around his neck for the rest of his presidency!
The midterms next year are going to be interesting.
quickymart:
For starters, Trump’s blanket pardon is unpopular, and it could help to frame early perceptions of his return to the White House.
Because already being a convicted criminal when announced as the Republican candidate wasn't enough of a clue.
iPad Pro 11" + iPhone 15 Pro Max + 2degrees 4tw!
These comments are my own and do not represent the opinions of 2degrees.
Trump's pick to run the DOJ really, really doesn't want to talk about the January 6 losers now. Maybe a few questions should be asked like the ones in here?
Also: these judges are someone to aspire to be like (as opposed to someone like the orange buffoon):
https://edition.cnn.com/2025/01/22/politics/federal-judges-speak-out-january-6-pardons/index.html
She's right, they will forever be "poor losers", as they deserve to be called, because that's exactly what they are!
Aw, poor little Donnie, his feelings are hurt by someone, ooh, I don't know - telling him the truth?? 🙄
Somebody says "no" to the Don ...
The NY Times - Trump’s Order to Restrict Birthright Citizenship ‘Blatantly Unconstitutional,’ Judge Says
breaking
A federal judge on Thursday temporarily blocked President Trump’s executive order to end automatic citizenship to babies born on American soil, dealing the president his first setback as he attempts to upend the nation’s immigration laws and reverse decades of precedent.
In a hearing held three days after Mr. Trump issued his executive order, a Federal District Court judge, John C. Coughenour, sided at least for the moment with four states that sued. “This is a blatantly unconstitutional order,” he said.
“Frankly,” he continued, challenging Trump administration lawyers, “I have difficulty understanding how a member of the bar would state unequivocally that this is a constitutional order. It just boggles my mind.”
Sideface
|
|
|