|
|
|
Asteros:
This video gave me the impetus to learn more about Charlie Kirk and MAGA. Gavin and Charlie are having a calm, good natured and robust conversation enjoying laughs together about the big issues.
This time I'm going to quote an article that was in The Bulwark today about Kirk's assassination, and what he actually stood for: https://www.thebulwark.com/i/173387649/free-speech
I would not say that Kirk was practicing politics in exactly the right way when he called last month for the “full military occupation” of American cities with high crime rates until the problem is solved.
I wouldn’t say he was doing things exactly the right way when he urged Mike Pence to ignore the electoral votes cast for Joe Biden by swing states in January 2021.
Nor would I say he was a model practitioner of politics when he applauded Trump’s pardon of the January 6 thugs earlier this year, describing them as “hostages” and celebrating their release as “bold action to save people from lawfare tyranny.”
And I guess I wouldn’t say that he was setting a fine political example when he called for a “patriot” to bail out the man who broke into Nancy Pelosi’s home and beat her elderly husband with a hammer.
Charlie Kirk was a prominent face in a postliberal political faction. He wasn’t the most ardent authoritarian in the ranks, and he certainly wasn’t the person of lowest character. But the movement he promoted and with which he aligned himself fundamentally doesn’t believe in doing politics “the right way,” and we should all remain clear about that in our grief. It likes to intimidate its opponents, as it’s doing right now with the show of military force in Washington D.C., and it reacts to losing debates by trying to overturn the results rather than accept them, as it did on Election Day 2020.
Kirk went along with it, doubtless realizing that he wouldn’t have remained a bigshot in a postliberal faction for long if he hadn’t. By no means is that to imply that he deserved what he got yesterday, of course, only to stress that sympathy for the victim and fear of what comes shouldn’t stop anyone from acknowledging that the populist right is a movement of civic arsonists led by a pyromaniac. If it’s true, as Trump said last night, that Kirk is “a martyr for truth and freedom,” honor the dead by continuing to exercise your freedom to tell the truth about this sleazy administration’s abiding contempt for practicing politics in the right, i.e., constitutional, way.
The bits I've bolded are things that - in my opinion - work against your assessment of him as having "robust conversation[s]" about "the big issues". These things aren't even (or never were) "issues", most of this - as I said before - were caused by Trump and his bold-faced lies rhetoric:
Then the pyromaniac in chief chimed in. “For years, those on the radical left have compared wonderful Americans like Charlie to Nazis,” Trump said in an address to the nation. “This kind of rhetoric is directly responsible for the terrorism that we’re seeing in our country today, and it must stop right now. My administration will find each and every one of those who contributed to this atrocity and to other political violence, including the organizations that fund it and support it, as well as those who go after our judges [and] law enforcement officials.”
Repeated from my earlier message - if you really want to "see the temperature come down", I would suggest directing your feelings towards the top of the Republican "food chain".
NBCNews: Pete Hegseth tells Pentagon staff to hunt for negative Charlie Kirk posts by service members. Several people have already been relieved of their jobs because of their posts on social media, defense officials told NBC News. One U.S. military officer said troops know they are not allowed to condone political violence, but being fired for criticizing a person, particularly a civilian who has no ties to the military, is extremely rare.

The NY Times - Trump Escalates Attacks on Political Opponents After Charlie Kirk’s Killing
Sept. 13, 2025
President Trump and his top advisers are escalating their attacks on their opponents in the wake of Charlie Kirk’s killing, placing the blame for political violence on Democrats alone and signaling a broad crackdown on critics and left-leaning institutions.
Mr. Trump blamed the “radical left” almost immediately after Mr. Kirk was shot, before the authorities had identified a suspect. ...
Mr. Trump has an expansive view of those he deems radical, applying that term to almost all of his political adversaries.
In his second term, Mr. Trump has pushed the boundaries of his authority to exact retribution on political opponents and institutions. ...
Critics of the administration now worry that Mr. Kirk’s murder could be used as a pretext to move even more aggressively against those who speak out against Mr. Trump.
Sideface
quickymart:And I guess I wouldn’t say that he was setting a fine political example when he called for a “patriot” to bail out the man who broke into Nancy Pelosi’s home and beat her elderly husband with a hammer.
gzt:At that time Kirk was intending to amplify some kind of conspiracy theory involving a sexual liason. The idea was a "patriot" should bail out the attacker and ask the attacker what really happened. It's fairly clear Kirk was not condoning the attack.
That's to show that Kirk was a master debater.
Like South Park demonstrated.
Referral links: Quic Broadband (free setup code: R587125ERQ6VE) | Samsung | AliExpress | Wise | Sharesies
Support Geekzone by subscribing (browse ads-free), or making a one-off or recurring donation through PressPatron.
kingdragonfly: Here's some quotes around the right-wing gathering in UK "Unite the Kingdom". It is far-right, anti-immigrant, or nationalist.
Disgusting.
It should be in the deplorables thread.
Referral links: Quic Broadband (free setup code: R587125ERQ6VE) | Samsung | AliExpress | Wise | Sharesies
Support Geekzone by subscribing (browse ads-free), or making a one-off or recurring donation through PressPatron.
AlJazeera: “The warship deployed 18 armed agents who boarded and occupied the small, harmless boat for eight hours,” the statement said, calling the incident a “direct provocation through the illegal use of excessive military means”. The move follows a US military strike last week in the Caribbean that killed 11 Venezuelans and sank a boat that the administration of US President Donald Trump claimed, without evidence, had been transporting narcotics.
gzt:kingdragonfly: Here's some quotes around the right-wing gathering in UK "Unite the Kingdom". It is far-right, anti-immigrant, or nationalist.
Guess who else..
/Offtopic for this thread..
Also offtopic, but what an odd couple those two make. We have a white-supremacist-dropkick, teaming up with an obviously-not white guy, all in the name of...uh...?
That Robinson guy must have really suspended his racist beliefs to work alongside someone like Brian Tamaki 🤷♂️
Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene
@RepMTG
I have many concerns about the AI Executive Order signed yesterday by President Trump.
While I understand the many promised benefits of AI, I remain committed to protecting state rights, human jobs, human lives, human rights, our environment and critical water supply.
My deep concerns are that the EO demands rapid AI expansion with little to no guardrails and breaks. It also contains the threat of withholding federal funds from states who regulate AI, which is an absolute threat to federalism and why I strongly opposed the AI state moratorium originally in the BBB.
Rushed AI expansion and data centers being built all over the country from state to state with no plan in regards to environmental and critical water supply impact has massive future implications and problems.
I’ve been in construction my entire life.
I can tell you firsthand, when you move dirt there is always an impact to the surrounding area.
When you build something that requires a HIGH water demand, it will always take water away from others - that means people, cities, businesses, and surrounding counties and states.
Data centers are like a black holes when it comes to water requirements. They consume massive amounts of water for cooling, literally millions of gallons per day.
If you know anything about the water wars between GA, TN, AL, and FLA, then you know states already fight each other over water supply. Counties fight each other over water supply and sue each other over PFAS/PFOS and other impacts.
Just wait and see how bad lawsuits will become when counties are competing for data centers, in order to get rid of county property taxes, and the unintended results is new data centers that steal the water from surrounding homes and neighboring counties and states.
Competing with China does not mean become like China by threatening state rights, replacing human jobs on mass scale creating mass poverty, and creating potentially devastating effects on our environment and critical water supply.
This needs a careful and wise approach. The AI EO takes the opposite.
|
|
|