|
|
|
freitasm:
Planning, sure. Action and results? Not so much.
Hey, you take that back. Shane Jones is going to spend $20M to add more diesel storage just in time for the diesel to run out!
iPad Pro 11" + iPhone 15 Pro Max + 2degrees 4tw!
These comments are my own and do not represent the opinions of 2degrees.
Heather Du Plessis of Newstalk ZB makes the case that Mark Mitchell should replace Luxon: https://archive.ph/9PKH4
That's what I think too - I don't think ever changing leader of the party in government before an election has ever really worked.
Sure, it was one thing for Jacinda Ardern to step in in 2017 for Labour - but they were in opposition back then.
As is normal Luxon will be given a chance while National in Government.
It's Luxon's problem if he actually does want to go as its not the junket he thought it was?
Once in opposition it will be a toss up if its gone by lunch, dinner, or breakfast.
Certain media are just talking it up for clicks.
Given the rewards for doing so other media follows or watches their views go down.
National, ACT, NZF have more of a track record for cuts.
Gave Wellington and other areas economies a heart attack.
People can see their healthcare and other services struggling even more. Water problems unaddressed.
Cuts to energy resilience.
Now in focus where investment in efficient electric rail freight and mass transit would have been handy
Industry is even struggling with power price killing off manufacturing for import substitution and export.
The big build project was LNG with an increased power price tag.
Luxon's problem is not so much him as he has real trouble talking about positive things the Government did that were not cuts.
Oh and being the dog wagged by ACT tail.
It gives the centre-left bloc of Labour, the Greens and Te Pati Maori the seats needed to govern with 66 compared to the coalition's 58, if an election was held today.
Another not-so-great poll for Luxon and co.
...But Christopher Luxon made his way through the morning media round with a new strategy: acknowledge there are concerns in caucus, tell everyone it’s coming from a small group, and try to communicate that he knows everyone’s issue with him - he’s not the “invite round for a barbecue and a beer” PM - but he can still do a good job.
By the time his post-Cabinet press conference came around on Monday afternoon, the fluster and bluster returned as he tried to obfuscate and stick to his lines that all was well on the Stuart Smith front.
I dunno, the orange buffoon can get away with this (to a point) - can Luxon do the same? 🤔
gzt: The Green Party says the Luxon government should launch the Ratepayers Assistance Scheme (RAS) now to provide government backed rooftop solar financing for new builds and existing homes.
RAS was independently developed by Local Government NZ and Rewiring Aotearoa. The government has made very positive noises about RAS for some time now with no obvious action taking place.
There are huge energy gains to be made particularly for new builds and new developments with planned grid access. The Green Party says Luxon could fund RAS with less money than the government already spent on energy consultants who told cabinet the LNG terminal is a really bad idea.
There's some work to do with solar. The push towards medium density housing (terraced etc) complicates it. And large-scale developments sometimes use private networks (which in itself should not be legal but let's not get into that) which in turn can curtail rollout for entire communities. I'm not sure why those people should be forced to underwrite people who can actually get solar when they can't.
And that's before we get into the issue of a lack of minimum buy-back rate, which seems like we should be looking into given that line companies get increases rubber-stamped with no real challenge - it's only fair that consumers should get the same levels of certainty and protection if they are generating their own electricity too.
On an equity note, I am a little uncomfortable with assistance going to those who have the wealth and means to fit solar in the first place. At some point we'll need to make some tough calls about gas as an energy source for households too. We're not so flush with cash that we can afford to do everything, unfortunately.
GV27: There's some work to do with solar. The push towards medium density housing (terraced etc) complicates it. And large-scale developments sometimes use private networks (which in itself should not be legal but let's not get into that) which in turn can curtail rollout for entire communities. I'm not sure why those people should be forced to underwrite people who can actually get solar when they can't.
gzt: Imo not an unusual situation for a government six months out from an election that has not started the campaign yet. Any comparison to historical data is likely to show that and any possible exception.
It’s quite the opposite. These are historically terrible numbers for a first term government and a National government in particular
The current numbers for National are 2002 English and 2020 Collins numbers. To lose 25% of their support in their first term would be unprecedented.
Looks like there will be a leadership spill at caucus today ... if Luxon survives it will be as the night watchman until after the election (which looks unwinnable for national at this point).
Mike
|
|
|