Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.
To post in this sub-forum you must have made 100 posts or have Trust status or have completed our ID Verification



View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 | 3 
kingdragonfly

11991 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 12877

Subscriber

  #2932720 21-Jun-2022 17:33
Send private message

9 News Australia's TV coverage seems biased, with a rogue's gallery / mugshots. It would be similar to what I'd expect from a mass shooting. It's rationalizing an over-the-top action from Australian Police, on private property.

For a different perspective, here's an Australia Greens policy advisor to Australian Greens MP Abigail Boyd.

I know the Green party, and overzealous climate activists, can be a pain in the arse.

However the Australia government are too cozy with the extraction industries, and 9News seems to be acting as a propaganda front.

Greens AU: Militarised police raid on climate campaigners is draconian police overreach

The actions of NSW Police, launching a preemptive raid against a property with a hundred armed police, dogs and helicopters, on suspicion of planning a protest action, is a terrifying overreach and abuse of power against peaceful climate campaigners.

That police felt emboldened to take this extraordinary authoritarian action should send a shockwave of alarm throughout our society - it is exactly the kind of assault on our democratic rights we warned of when the new anti-protest legislation were rushed through just months ago.

The tactics being deployed by the NSW Police are taken directly from the playbook of repressive police state regimes around the world, serving to stifle political expression and civil dissent and serving as a protection racket for big business and industries who turn a profit on the destruction of our environment and social wellbeing.

The Greens utterly condemn this police action. We must resist this authoritarian creep towards a police state. The Greens will, at every point, continue to resist and oppose this anti-democratic trend and the dangerous legislation that enables it.

It's unclear on what legal basis the warrant was executed, and the justification provided by police has been vague.

There are numerous conflicting and frankly implausible statements in the police story seeking to explain away their extraordinary armed deployment against a group of unarmed peaceful climate campaigners, who were not breaking any laws and were on private property.

There are reports that these armed and masked police officers failed to identify themselves when the campaigners first came across them on the morning of the raid. After being discovered on the property, it is reported that a large black car sped down the private driveway to the campsite, which the two camouflaged officers entered. The vehicle reportedly accelerated towards people standing on the road, striking and injuring two people.

Blockade Australia is a climate campaigner group with exactly zero history of violence. For armed police to claim they feared for their lives seems a cynical attempt to spin a narrative to legitimise an enormous and militarised raid on a group of peaceful activists.

Blockade Australia report that, after the police returned with the full scale raid of the camp, a number of understandably scared and intimidated people fled into the bush. By 9pm, and with NSW Police occupying the campsite since 11am, one person was still missing. During cold and dangerous conditions, it's reported that the police obstructed efforts to search for this missing person, threatening locals and Blockade Australia members with arrest and preventing an SES search crew from being deployed.

The actions of NSW Police were dangerous and reckless, and risked the life and wellbeing of peaceful climate campaigners and local residents.

We have won so many of the rights we now take for granted through protest actions and civil disobedience, but both of the major parties in NSW have joined together to pass laws that give police licence to intimidate residents and raid properties on the mere suspicion of a peaceful protest being planned.

Non-violent direct action is not something that exists separate from politics - it is a fundamental avenue of political expression. The rights of free political speech are under attack by this Coalition Government and the Labor Party.

The NSW Liberals have been busy these last weeks spinning a pre-election narrative as a more cuddly and socially progressive party that is distinct from their federal counterpart - but it's in these actions that they once again show their true colours. They're trying to tell us they want to give the people of NSW a leg up, when really all we get is the boot.



Rikkitic
Awrrr
19071 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 16315

Lifetime subscriber

  #2932729 21-Jun-2022 17:51
Send private message

kingdragonfly: 9 News Australia's TV coverage seems biased, with a rogue's gallery / mugshots. It would be similar to what I'd expect from a mass shooting. It's rationalizing an over-the-top action from Australian Police, on private property.

 

I saw something about this on Australia news and was perplexed by the apparent hostility and arrogance of statements by different police officers and officials. I would have hoped such attitudes had gone out of fashion years ago. It seemed  like something right out of the 1970s. Not sure I feel much like visiting South Australia or Queensland or anyplace else in that country if this is how they do things.

 

 





Plesse igmore amd axxept applogies in adbance fir anu typos

 


 


kingdragonfly

11991 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 12877

Subscriber

  #2932730 21-Jun-2022 17:52
Send private message

No surprise ownership of "Nine Entertainment" is a Murdoch-owned subsidy of Rupert Murdoch's "News Corp."

Media bias rating for 9News Australia.

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/9-news-australia/

Here's the 9News segment




Handle9
11926 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 9679

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #2932731 21-Jun-2022 17:56
Send private message

kingdragonfly: No surprise ownership of "Nine Entertainment" is a Murdoch-owned subsidy of Rupert Murdoch's "News Corp."


Nope, it’s in no way affiliated with Murdoch.

kingdragonfly

11991 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 12877

Subscriber

  #2932746 21-Jun-2022 19:21
Send private message

This says different, thought it's a subsidiary as I said

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass_media_in_Australia

Handle9
11926 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 9679

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #2932752 21-Jun-2022 19:31
Send private message

 Please quote in that article where it says Nine is a subsidiary - it doesn't.

 

In case you were wondering Nine Entertainments ticker symbol on the ASX is NEC


 
 
 

Shop on-line at New World now for your groceries (affiliate link).
Handle9
11926 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 9679

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #2933712 24-Jun-2022 05:34
Send private message

How’s that quote coming along?

kingdragonfly

11991 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 12877

Subscriber

  #2933837 24-Jun-2022 11:42
Send private message

On a climate change forum, why are you obsessing about Nine Entertainments. They are a subsidy of a subsidy that belongs to Murdoch.

And frankly I don't care; it was mentioned as an aside.

Is that really more important than the major point of my post: the over-the-top "throw 'em in jail to rot" attitude of a non-violent protester group by News9?

freitasm
BDFL - Memuneh
80655 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 41053

Administrator
ID Verified
Trusted
Geekzone
Lifetime subscriber

  #2933874 24-Jun-2022 12:27
Send private message

@kingdragonfly: On a climate change forum, why are you obsessing about Nine Entertainments. They are a subsidy of a subsidy that belongs to Murdoch.

And frankly I don't care; it was mentioned as an aside.

 

 

 

You should care for the truth.

 

Nine Entertainment Co. Pty Ltd is a publicly listed. It's not a subsidiary of subsidiary of a company that belongs to Murdoch.

 

Nine Entertainment - Wikipedia





Referral links: Quic Broadband (free setup code: R587125ERQ6VE) | Samsung | AliExpress | Wise | Sharesies 

 

Support Geekzone by subscribing (browse ads-free), or making a one-off or recurring donation through PressPatron.

 


Handle9
11926 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 9679

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #2933954 24-Jun-2022 15:08
Send private message

freitasm:

@kingdragonfly: On a climate change forum, why are you obsessing about Nine Entertainments. They are a subsidy of a subsidy that belongs to Murdoch.

And frankly I don't care; it was mentioned as an aside.


 


You should care for the truth.


Nine Entertainment Co. Pty Ltd is a publicly listed. It's not a subsidiary of subsidiary of a company that belongs to Murdoch.


Nine Entertainment - Wikipedia



Yip. Accuracy matters. If you don’t care about what is true or false then it impacts your credibility.

kingdragonfly

11991 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 12877

Subscriber

  #2937350 1-Jul-2022 18:24
Send private message

Washington Post: US Supreme Court limits EPA’s power to combat climate change

...US supreme court justice Elena Kagan, writing for herself and fellow liberal justices Stephen G. Breyer and Sonia Sotomayor, countered that the majority had empowered the wrong people to pass judgment on an existential dilemma.

“The Court appoints itself — instead of Congress or the expert agency — the decisionmaker on climate policy,” Kagan wrote. “I cannot think of many things more frightening.”
...

1 | 2 | 3 
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic








Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.