|
|
|
But approved, organised disruption will still inconvenience a few.
Yes I do want people with different motivations to be treated differently.
“The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.” -John Kenneth Galbraith
rb99
But my main point is in at least the UK they're constantly making it more difficult to disagree and the consequences more severe if you do.
“The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.” -John Kenneth Galbraith
rb99
rb99:
But my main point is in at least the UK they're constantly making it more difficult to disagree and the consequences more severe if you do.
The consequences aren't for 'disagreeing'. The consequences are for being a punisher about it who thinks that disagreeing makes you untouchable.
rb99:
But my main point is in at least the UK they're constantly making it more difficult to disagree and the consequences more severe if you do.
Actually not unlike China.
Plesse igmore amd axxept applogies in adbance fir anu typos
Is it more difficult or is your protest method getting more extreme.
Your right to 'disagree' is unhindered, none of us have a right to get our 'way' 100%, 100% of the time.
In liberal democracies there are many methods of protest accepted and you can even organize with police a suitable time and place. In turn for being sensible you may get free traffic control.
There are many protests you can do without unconditionally blocking roads, motorways, potentially vandalizing irreplaceable artworks as well.
Karen did not turn up to do traffic control as she got in an argument on the way.
That family in the car that swerved off the road should have been more careful, as for the fuel tanker that followed.
Smart protests require thought, and maybe that crazy TikTok like challenge is enough for your lazy mind.
Protests that engage people including your opponents, make them think and change minds harder.
Is it about your cause or just about your fame, about you getting your way ?
If we all did this all the time what society would you have.
Every day a Brian Tamaki blocking the motorway after prayers day,
until we stop sinning and tithe to him.
Queen - I Want It All (Official Video Remastered)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hFDcoX7s6rE
Oh, P.S. the 'you' is more metaphorical, aiming at these protesters, not directly at poster.
Nothing personal.
'Something rotten in the state of Denmark'
rb99: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2022/nov/29/just-stop-oil-activist-sentenced-to-six-months-in-prison-for-motorway-disruption
rb99:They might sometimes bugger things up for some people, but at least they get off their assets and do something, unlike me. And being jailed for the sin of inconveniencing people is just wrong.
Handle9:rb99:
They might sometimes bugger things up for some people, but at least they get off their assets and do something, unlike me. And being jailed for the sin of inconveniencing people is just wrong.
I take it from this statement that you feel the people who occupied the New Zealand parliament grounds also should have no consequences for their actions?
You are taking conflation to a whole new level here.
Plesse igmore amd axxept applogies in adbance fir anu typos
Rikkitic:Handle9:
I take it from this statement that you feel the people who occupied the New Zealand parliament grounds also should have no consequences for their actions?You are taking conflation to a whole new level here.
Handle9:
Not at all. You don’t get to have different rules for protests you like to ones you don’t like.
Do you really think what happened at Parliament is equivalent to blocking a motorway?
Plesse igmore amd axxept applogies in adbance fir anu typos
Rikkitic:Handle9:Not at all. You don’t get to have different rules for protests you like to ones you don’t like.
Do you really think what happened at Parliament is equivalent to blocking a motorway?
Handle9:
Exactly equivalent, of course not. It’s on the same continuum though. I’d expect the stuff that happened at parliament to get comparatively more severe sentences than people blocking a motorway.
According to your logic, women should not have been given the vote and neither should black people in America. Both of these movements and many other worthy causes began with actions on that 'same continuum'.
Just to be clear, I do not think the occupation of parliament was on the same continuum and I support the police action to end it.
Plesse igmore amd axxept applogies in adbance fir anu typos
Rikkitic:
According to your logic, women should not have been given the vote and neither should black people in America. Both of these movements and many other worthy causes began with actions on that 'same continuum'.
And in those cases, I'm sure plenty of people were prepared to go to jail for what they believed in.
The issue I see here is that people think the thing they believe in means they should be above criminal consequences.
Rikkitic:Handle9:
Exactly equivalent, of course not. It’s on the same continuum though. I’d expect the stuff that happened at parliament to get comparatively more severe sentences than people blocking a motorway.According to your logic, women should not have been given the vote and neither should black people in America. Both of these movements and many other worthy causes began with actions on that 'same continuum'.
Just to be clear, I do not think the occupation of parliament was on the same continuum and I support the police action to end it.
|
|
|