|
|
|
It's the media.
It's the racists.
It's not the anti-semites because they were on our side.
All we know is it's definitely not our fault. Never is.
SJB:The SNP need the approval of the UK Government for another independence referendum. They won't get it while Johnson is PM.
Handle9:SJB:
The SNP need the approval of the UK Government for another independence referendum. They won't get it while Johnson is PM.
Ah the irony...
Even funnier, Tory trolls on Twitter etc are shouting that the SNP only got 45% of the vote in Scotland (but 48/59 seats) so have no mandate to call a referendum.
Yet their Conservative party only got 43.6% of the UK vote.
Fred99:Handle9:SJB:The SNP need the approval of the UK Government for another independence referendum. They won't get it while Johnson is PM.
Ah the irony...Even funnier, Tory trolls on Twitter etc are shouting that the SNP only got 45% of the vote in Scotland (but 48/59 seats) so have no mandate to call a referendum.
Yet their Conservative party only got 43.6% of the UK vote.
Personally I think the breakup of the Union could be a positive move.
It makes no sense to me in this day and age for Northern Ireland to not be part of Ireland although any move in that direction would undoubtedly have unionists with guns on the streets again.
I don't have a problem with Scotland going it's own way either if a referendum results in a majority to leave. How long that would take to be enacted though is anyone's guess. If the first stage of leaving the EU (where membership has only been for 40+ years) has taken 3 years separating Scotland, which has been part of the union for 400 years, from the rest of the UK would take decades. And I doubt that they could rejoin the EU until that process was complete.
Corbyn was unelectable. And he and his Momentum backers are in denial over why they lost.
Unfortunately Momentum now control all the levers of the Labour party. Being zealots they won't moderate their policies so unless the economy really tanks in the next 5 years they better get used to residing in the opposition wastelands. They are going to be there for a long time.
marmel:
Meanwhile in NZ the current government (Labour/NZF) actually got less of the vote combined than the highest polling party.
Weren't you attempting to give me a lecture on "whatboutism" earlier in this thread?
Please try to stay on topic. If you want to discuss FPP vs PR, start another thread, if you want to discuss the present NZ coalition, there are plenty of existing threads.
SJB:
Personally I think the breakup of the Union could be a positive move.
It makes no sense to me in this day and age for Northern Ireland to not be part of Ireland although any move in that direction would undoubtedly have unionists with guns on the streets again.
I don't have a problem with Scotland going it's own way either if a referendum results in a majority to leave. How long that would take to be enacted though is anyone's guess. If the first stage of leaving the EU (where membership has only been for 40+ years) has taken 3 years separating Scotland, which has been part of the union for 400 years, from the rest of the UK would take decades. And I doubt that they could rejoin the EU until that process was complete.
Well if Scotland were to leave, then it brings about the familiar issues with customs union vs hard border or "something else".
I doubt it's going to happen - nor is desirable. NI - it'll be interesting to see how that progresses. For a US:UK FTA, I understand that the Democrats have said they'll block an FTA if the GFA is compromised.
Fred99:marmel:
Meanwhile in NZ the current government (Labour/NZF) actually got less of the vote combined than the highest polling party.Weren't you attempting to give me a lecture on "whatboutism" earlier in this thread?
Please try to stay on topic. If you want to discuss FPP vs PR, start another thread, if you want to discuss the present NZ coalition, there are plenty of existing threads.
marmel: I suspected you were the type of person who would enjoy using the term “whataboutism”.
Case closed on that one.
Fine. To be clear, you use whataboutism - and then try to defend it.
You deserve being called out for it.
As for your comment "suspecting (I am) the type of person etc", I suggest you read the FUG.
Just pointing out that as well as whataboutism, you're quick to launch ad-hom attacks. Both are invalid/fallacious reasoning. Case closed on that one too.
Fred99:marmel: I suspected you were the type of person who would enjoy using the term “whataboutism”.
Case closed on that one.Fine. To be clear, you use whataboutism - and then try to defend it.
You deserve being called out for it.
As for your comment "suspecting (I am) the type of person etc", I suggest you read the FUG.
Just pointing out that as well as whataboutism, you're quick to launch ad-hom attacks. Both are invalid/fallacious reasoning. Case closed on that one too.
marmel: Anyway coming back to the topic I think the Scottish vote is a mute point.
Then why are you talking about it?
Fred99:marmel: Anyway coming back to the topic I think the Scottish vote is a mute point.Then why are you talking about it?
Can Scotland even afford to pay for its own stuff? Like if it breaks away, can it sustain itself from general taxation within its own borders?
|
|
|