|
|
|
tdgeek:
http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/10899/Cabinet-agrees-to-new-finance-company-regulations
Interesting read. <snip>
Wrong link?
Sideface
Sideface:
tdgeek:
http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/10899/Cabinet-agrees-to-new-finance-company-regulations
Interesting read. <snip>
Wrong link?
Sorry, wrong tab
I do wonder if (hope) that professor turns out to be like the octopus etc claimed to be able to predict world cup victories etc - until by chance they're wrong.
Getting 40 years of election predictions right sounds impressive, but there aren't so many 50:50 bets when many of them were foregone conclusions. The Bush:Gore election wasn't - so in "knowing" that he must have had extra-sensory perception of the minds of the US Supreme Court.
Of course he's just trying to make some $$$ selling his book. He's clearly old-school republican - look at his ludicrous young man hair - on old man head, and choice of ties.
darylblake: Clinton is an abysmal candidate.
Fred99:
I do wonder if (hope) that professor turns out to be like the octopus etc claimed to be able to predict world cup victories etc - until by chance they're wrong.
Getting 40 years of election predictions right sounds impressive, but there aren't so many 50:50 bets when many of them were foregone conclusions. <snip>
"Lichtman, a distinguished professor of history at American University, revealed in an interview this week who he thinks will win in November, and why 2016 was the most difficult election to predict yet."
Sideface
Sideface:
Fred99:
I do wonder if (hope) that professor turns out to be like the octopus etc claimed to be able to predict world cup victories etc - until by chance they're wrong.
Getting 40 years of election predictions right sounds impressive, but there aren't so many 50:50 bets when many of them were foregone conclusions. <snip>
"Lichtman, a distinguished professor of history at American University, revealed in an interview this week who he thinks will win in November, and why 2016 was the most difficult election to predict yet."
Does that mean the lauded professor is taking a punt that if he's right, his reputation for greatness will soar, while giving himself an out if he's wrong?
Professor or not - he seems like a silly old man with a bad hairdo making a guess and trying to "influence" things to me.
Trump has issued a warning that "Clinton is going to rig the presidential debate by using facts", saying "it's a disgrace".
He also warned that unless CNN, which is hosting the debate, promises to forbid the use of facts, he might pull out of Monday’s contest. "I'm only going to debate if I’m treated fairly, and facts don’t treat me fairly."
Fred99:
I do wonder if (hope) that professor turns out to be like the octopus etc claimed to be able to predict world cup victories etc - until by chance they're wrong. <snip>
It must be true. ![]()
The Professor was featured on tonight's Channel 1 News
Sideface
Fred99:
Trump has issued a warning that "Clinton is going to rig the presidential debate by using facts",
rig ... by using facts
facts
...I have no words.
iPad Pro 11" + iPhone 15 Pro Max + 2degrees 4tw!
These comments are my own and do not represent the opinions of 2degrees.
Fred99:
Sideface:
Fred99:
I do wonder if (hope) that professor turns out to be like the octopus etc claimed to be able to predict world cup victories etc - until by chance they're wrong.
Getting 40 years of election predictions right sounds impressive, but there aren't so many 50:50 bets when many of them were foregone conclusions. <snip>
"Lichtman, a distinguished professor of history at American University, revealed in an interview this week who he thinks will win in November, and why 2016 was the most difficult election to predict yet."
Does that mean the lauded professor is taking a punt that if he's right, his reputation for greatness will soar, while giving himself an out if he's wrong?
Professor or not - he seems like a silly old man with a bad hairdo making a guess and trying to "influence" things to me.
???
His metrics work. Given Trump is an idiot, outside the norm, he's admitted thats a change. Its not about the voters, its about the American psyche, and he seems to have nailed that
Fred99:
Trump has issued a warning that "Clinton is going to rig the presidential debate by using facts", saying "it's a disgrace".
He also warned that unless CNN, which is hosting the debate, promises to forbid the use of facts, he might pull out of Monday’s contest. "I'm only going to debate if I’m treated fairly, and facts don’t treat me fairly."
I agree.I hate facts. Facts are the disdain of society. The truth should really be outlawed. I prefer swept back hairdos and fake tan. Wow. We are the most intelligent lifeforms that has emerged from Planet Earth??? ;-)
tdgeek:
Fred99:
Trump has issued a warning that "Clinton is going to rig the presidential debate by using facts", saying "it's a disgrace".
He also warned that unless CNN, which is hosting the debate, promises to forbid the use of facts, he might pull out of Monday’s contest. "I'm only going to debate if I’m treated fairly, and facts don’t treat me fairly."
I agree. I hate facts. Facts are the disdain of society. The truth should really be outlawed. I prefer swept back hairdos and fake tan. Wow. We are the most intelligent lifeforms that has emerged from Planet Earth??? ;-)
Just remember that Trump Facts are much more flexible, spontaneous and temporary than boring old Clinton Facts. ![]()
Sideface
|
|
|