![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Sounds like we have a Musk fanboy.
kingdragonfly: Vice: Why Are Elon Musk and Marc Andreesen Obsessed With Birth Rates?
...Musk doesn’t seem to follow the lead of other conservatives who insist we must have more children within nuclear families to preserve Western civilization and its values. Musk has nine children: five with his first wife before an acrimonious divorce; two with Canadian musician Grimes; and the secret twins with Neuralink executive Shivon Zilis.
For Musk and others, the future is in growth. After all, Musk and other reactionary billionaires have thrown millions at groups centered on longtermism, a cultish philosophy which believes “nothing matters more, ethically speaking, than fulfilling our potential as a species of ‘Earth-originating intelligent life’.” The philosophy hinges on doing whatever you can to maximize the well-being of humanity millions, billions, and trillions of years into the future, as well as mitigating risks to civilization and the species. And as Musk has said, he believes low birth rates are “the biggest danger civilization faces by far.”
...
If the birth rate isn't curbed, the biggest risk will be mass famine and environmental degradation from the demands of unsustainable overpopulation.
Plesse igmore amd axxept applogies in adbance fir anu typos
No, Musk is not God (who guessed it?).
The danger to become God is AI - and certainly not out of instinctive fear of the unknown. Even Elon Musk publicly admits his greatest misgivings about AI, and his beliefs are already in the more right-wing corner after all. AI programmes will no longer have a national root, will be abstract objects that hover above everything and can no longer be tracked for control. The METAverse wants to plug us into a corporate world in which we produce (data) - whether we like it or not. Zuckerberg is brainwashing us as his business model. Once these projects are up and running (they already are), there will be no stopping them. It is devastating to endure this modern enslavement of humanity by technology corporations. What started seemingly harmless turns out to be the greatest danger to freedom and democracy - only by then it is already too late.
- NET: FTTH, OPNsense, 10G backbone, GWN APs, ipPBX
- SRV: 12 RU HA server cluster, 0.1 PB storage on premise
- IoT: thread, zigbee, tasmota, BidCoS, LoRa, WX suite, IR
- 3D: two 3D printers, 3D scanner, CNC router, laser cutter
kingdragonfly: New York Times: Elon Musk sells nearly $7 billion in Tesla shares to finance his Twitter deal.
TBH I suspect the Musk would not be unhappy buying Twitter, bots included, its the price that is at issue,
He'll be hoping to convince the Judge to order a reduction in price due to the issues about how many "real" users there are...
kingdragonfly: Regarding the Facebook / Meta AI bot, it here's a related article called "It took just one weekend for Meta's new AI Chatbot to become racist.
Suppose it got a lot of likes, followers and engagement.
So shows more about Facebook and its algorithm than AI as such.
AI was no doubt tuned with an aim in mind, and that aim showed what a sewer Facebook/Meta can be.
Zuckerberg's decision to put rabid engagement above all else.
AI tuned towards moderation, given suitable role models are not so popular.
Zuckerberg decided there is no money in a deradicalization chatbot.
He wants more addicts.
Elons main worry about AI is it will look at Teslas P/E, his selldowns, then vigorously short Tesla.
This is the guy who seriously said that an Air Hockey Table in a Vaccum Tube was simple and easy.
Missed the contradiction as the Popular Mechanics from his childhood did for sake of a good story.
Anyway next issue was on living on Mars before turn of millennium, so only had his attention for a short time.
Elon is for Elon and thats fine for him, but does not make him a great candidate for savior of humanity.
Zuckerburg is solely for Zuckerburg, Steve Jobs was just for Steve Jobs and so it goes.
Musk is an idiot.
wellygary:
kingdragonfly: New York Times: Elon Musk sells nearly $7 billion in Tesla shares to finance his Twitter deal.
TBH I suspect the Musk would not be unhappy buying Twitter, bots included, its the price that is at issue,
He'll be hoping to convince the Judge to order a reduction in price due to the issues about how many "real" users there are...
I doubt the judge will have scope to set the price.
Rather he will be there to assess whether the contract as signed is enforceable.
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |