Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


BTR



1522 posts

Uber Geek


#153567 1-Oct-2014 15:04
Send private message

Just watching a video during my lunch break today and came across the below video and my understanding is that the speaker of the house is meant to be impartial to any party and is supposed to treat everyone in the house equal however in the video he is clearly not.

Surely if a speaker is deemed to be favouring a person/party they should be removed from that position...



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LwIO1v4YXRU



Your thoughts?




---

 

Full time IT Manager, part time gamer & part time grease monkey. 

 

 

 

Certifications : Apple ACHT, Apple ACDT,  Apple ACPT, Sonicwall CSSA, Ruckus WISE Guy, Allied Telesis CAI & CASE

 

Youtube Channel https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCmFzRr2KofyrHV6t36pdC_w

 

 


Create new topic

Bee

593 posts

Ultimate Geek


  #1144890 1-Oct-2014 15:22
Send private message

And yet, going back thru history the speaker is almost always selected from members of the governing party...

If you wanted a real impartial speaker why wouldn't you get a random (yet qualified!) person from the street?

15337 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Subscriber

  #1144905 1-Oct-2014 15:36
Send private message

The Speaker of the House is Elected by all PM's at the beginning of each Term. The Speaker controls the House and is neutral. The Speaker is 3rd in the hierarchy following the Governor General and Prime Minister.




Mike

 

Consultant

 


The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

He waka eke noa


 
 
 
 


2438 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted

  #1144913 1-Oct-2014 15:52
Send private message

The fact that the speaker comes from the ruling isn't necessarily the problem - rather it rests on the individuals knowledge of parliamentary procedure and willingness to stand up to our political leaders. 

David Carter << Lockwood Smith

22884 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #1144950 1-Oct-2014 16:58
Send private message

My understanding is that the PM Provides this from his list of MP's which in this elections case meant they were 1 short to lead alone, thus requiring Act or UF to partnership.

3316 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted

  #1144958 1-Oct-2014 17:15
Send private message

networkn: My understanding is that the PM Provides this from his list of MP's which in this elections case meant they were 1 short to lead alone, thus requiring Act or UF to partnership.

I don't think that's the case.

From the parliament website: "The Speaker’s vote is included in any party vote cast and the Speaker votes in a personal vote..."

I think Act and United Future are just there for a buffer and to keep up good relations.

ckc

321 posts

Ultimate Geek
Inactive user


  #1144983 1-Oct-2014 17:38
Send private message

If there's a by-election in the next three years, or they lose a seat after special votes are counted, then they might need either ACT or United Peter. I think that's why they're doing it. Shut them out now with a slim majority and they might not back your crucial bills if the worst happens.

But also, MPs electing the speaker is immaterial, because the ruling party/coalition will favour their man, and so you just end up with the speaker the government wants.

14696 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #1144993 1-Oct-2014 17:57
Send private message

BTR: Just watching a video during my lunch break today and came across the below video and my understanding is that the speaker of the house is meant to be impartial to any party and is supposed to treat everyone in the house equal however in the video he is clearly not.

Surely if a speaker is deemed to be favouring a person/party they should be removed from that position...



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LwIO1v4YXRU



Your thoughts?


My school debating team was more interesting.

These guys are paid plenty of money: they should spend more time sorting out bigger problems than indulging in infantile point scoring by way of who complied with antediluvian debating regulations that probably serve little, if any, purpose.





 
 
 
 


3370 posts

Uber Geek

Subscriber

  #1145003 1-Oct-2014 18:16
Send private message

bazzer:
networkn: My understanding is that the PM Provides this from his list of MP's which in this elections case meant they were 1 short to lead alone, thus requiring Act or UF to partnership.

I don't think that's the case.

From the parliament website: "The Speaker’s vote is included in any party vote cast and the Speaker votes in a personal vote..."

I think Act and United Future are just there for a buffer and to keep up good relations.


In the past the Speaker lost his vote so in 1993 the Nats offered Labour's Peter Tapsell the job so they would retain their 1 seat majority without having to depend on Winston's vote.

4123 posts

Uber Geek
Inactive user


  #1145059 1-Oct-2014 19:23
Send private message

Jeez aren't you guys over f%*ing politics yet?

6014 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
DR
Lifetime subscriber

  #1145188 1-Oct-2014 22:34
Send private message

kiwitrc: Jeez aren't you guys over f%*ing politics yet?

 


That's exactly what the ruling party wants us to do - fall asleep for the next three years until the next election.
"The country's in the very best of hands"  Yeah Nah
Politics should be a continuous process, not just a triennial circus.




Sideface


4123 posts

Uber Geek
Inactive user


  #1145261 2-Oct-2014 06:36
Send private message

Sideface:
kiwitrc: Jeez aren't you guys over f%*ing politics yet?

That's exactly what the ruling party wants us to do - fall asleep for the next three years until the next election.
"The country's in the very best of hands"  Yeah Nah
Politics should be a continuous process, not just a triennial circus.


I can see your point, Labour were just a bit unlucky I guess, especially considering how swimmingly they are going as opposition.

3370 posts

Uber Geek

Subscriber

  #1145278 2-Oct-2014 07:19
Send private message

Only the 1M voters that didn't bother will know.

Create new topic




News »

Freeview On Demand app launches on Sony Android TVs
Posted 6-Aug-2020 13:35


UFB hits more than one million connections
Posted 6-Aug-2020 09:42


D-Link A/NZ extends COVR Wi-Fi EasyMesh System series with new three-pack
Posted 4-Aug-2020 15:01


New Zealand software Rfider tracks coffee from Colombia all the way to New Zealand businesses
Posted 3-Aug-2020 10:35


Logitech G launches Pro X Wireless gaming headset
Posted 3-Aug-2020 10:21


Sony Alpha 7S III provides supreme imaging performance
Posted 3-Aug-2020 10:11


Sony introduces first CFexpress Type A memory card
Posted 3-Aug-2020 10:05


Marsello acquires Goody consolidating online and in-store marketing position
Posted 30-Jul-2020 16:26


Fonterra first major customer for Microsoft's New Zealand datacentre
Posted 30-Jul-2020 08:07


Everything we learnt at the IBM Cloud Forum 2020
Posted 29-Jul-2020 14:45


Dropbox launches native HelloSign workflow and data residency in Australia
Posted 29-Jul-2020 12:48


Spark launches 5G in Palmerston North
Posted 29-Jul-2020 09:50


Lenovo brings speed and smarter features to new 5G mobile gaming phone
Posted 28-Jul-2020 22:00


Withings raises $60 million to enable bridge between patients and healthcare
Posted 28-Jul-2020 21:51


QNAP integrates Catalyst Cloud Object Storage into Hybrid Backup solution
Posted 28-Jul-2020 21:40



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.


Support Geekzone »

Our community of supporters help make Geekzone possible. Click the button below to join them.

Support Geezone on PressPatron



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.