Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.
To post in this sub-forum you must have made 100 posts or have Trust status or have completed our ID Verification



sen8or

1897 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1402


#323868 28-Jan-2026 10:28
Send private message quote this post

I've put this in politics as it seems the best fit.

 

I was reading the article this morning on the tragedy at Mt Maunganui "https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/mount-maunganui-landslide-experts-say-slip-history-not-tree-felling-highlighted-dangers/premium/PI3SR55G55DXHHUYNZ6DP5EODA/" where there has been (I assume) speculation by some that the removal of the trees was a significant cause of the landslide, this is being labelled as mis-information in the headline. 

 

This is all too fresh and no doubt a full investigation will have to occur to find out what the significant contributing factors were to the tragedy, but its another example of where main stream media labels something as mis-informaiton / fake news etc etc.

 

I guess it started with Trump and his "fake news" comments about pretty much anything that went against his agenda / perspective, but it was evident in NZ particularly during the pandemic where media was trying to battle social media and/or obscure and politically leaning media on alternative opinions (or alternative facts depending on your leaning), but also with other things like 3 waters.

 

I get that there is no single source for "truth", but are there some publications / websites that are more reliable than others, some that are balanced / neutral politically etc?


Create new topic

gzt

gzt
18672 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 7808

Lifetime subscriber

  #3456695 28-Jan-2026 15:08
Send private message quote this post

sen8or: This is all too fresh and no doubt a full investigation will have to occur to find out what the significant contributing factors were to the tragedy, but its another example of where main stream media labels something as mis-informaiton / fake news etc etc.

You have it wrong. The "main stream media" did not label anything. The main stream media is correctly reporting the remarks of the prime minister. The label "misinformation" was directly applied by the prime minister:

https://www.stuff.co.nz/nz-news/360929697/pm-decries-spread-racist-misinformation-after-landslide



Rikkitic
Awrrr
19062 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 16302

Lifetime subscriber

  #3456968 29-Jan-2026 12:04
Send private message quote this post

Define truth. 

 

If there is a natural disaster, both mainstream media and conspiracy media will report what happened. But one may attribute it to bad luck while the other will blame dark forces in the government. Truth is whatever you want it to be. 

 

 





Plesse igmore amd axxept applogies in adbance fir anu typos

 


 


sen8or

1897 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1402


  #3457108 30-Jan-2026 08:06
Send private message quote this post

Thats the problem I guess, perspective / bias will always influence what you believe to be the truth and until there is objectionably verifiable facts that prove something one way or another, many will simply believe whatever is published to be true. Even presented with verified facts, some will still dismiss them as fake news or a conspiracy. 

 

 


Create new topic








Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.