Anti-hate laws affecting anti-fascist message

To post in this sub-forum you must have made 100 posts or have Trust status or have completed our ID Verification

Forums › Politics › Anti-hate laws affecting anti-fascist message

freitasm

BDFL - Memuneh
80646 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 41030

Administrator

ID Verified

Trusted

Geekzone

Lifetime subscriber

#324044 19-Feb-2026 15:04

A new anti-hate law is enacted in Australia. What happens when you use nazi imagery as an anti-fascist message, not as a racist message?

https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2026/feb/19/police-seize-art-posters-depicting-trump-putin-and-netanyahu-in-nazi-uniforms-from-canberra-bar-ntwnfb

Referral links: Quic Broadband (free setup code: R587125ERQ6VE) | Samsung | AliExpress | Wise | Sharesies

Support Geekzone by subscribing (browse ads-free), or making a one-off or recurring donation through PressPatron.

MikeAqua

8024 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3817

#3465936 2-Mar-2026 13:07

That is one of the risks with hate speech laws. They can capture things they weren't intended to capture. I suspect most people would think they could spot hate speech. It's one of those, I know it when I see it things. But ... try defining it legally in a broad context. Especially if interpreted literally. A judge would (hopefully) realise that isn't what parliament intended, dismiss the case and order the return of the confiscated art. A police officer is less likely to.

When Kris Fafoi (Min of Justice) was sponsoring a bill to expand the protection offered under hate speech laws, he couldn't explain how they would be interpreted saying that would be up to the courts. As the sponsor it was his role to outline the purpose and intent of the bill for parliament. If an intelligent articulate Minister of Justice can't explain intent of a law ... what hope would the police have.

The other issue is that hate speech laws can be used as a political football or weaponised by either side (I'm not saying that is the case in the article OP linked to).

Mike

gzt

18678 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 7809

Lifetime subscriber

#3465956 2-Mar-2026 14:41

"Police will not charge Canberra bar owner after seizing posters under new Commonwealth hate laws", "Police had previously said the issue with the posters was the inclusion of Nazi swastikas, which is a prohibited symbol under the Combatting Antisemitism, Hate and Extremism Act 2026"

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-02-25/police-to-return-posters-after-hate-law-seizures/106387066

In that sense the effect of the law is similar to Germany where nazi swastika is a banned symbol since end of WWII. Likewise in Germany it is legal in some contexts.

Rikkitic

Awrrr
19062 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 16302

Lifetime subscriber

#3465957 2-Mar-2026 14:48

gzt: "Police will not charge Canberra bar owner after seizing posters under new Commonwealth hate laws", "Police had previously said the issue with the posters was the inclusion of Nazi swastikas, which is a prohibited symbol under the Combatting Antisemitism, Hate and Extremism Act 2026"

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-02-25/police-to-return-posters-after-hate-law-seizures/106387066

In that sense the effect of the law is similar to Germany where nazi swastika is a banned symbol since end of WWII.

Hindus and Buddhists might have a problem with that.

Plesse igmore amd axxept applogies in adbance fir anu typos

gzt

18678 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 7809

Lifetime subscriber

#3465959 2-Mar-2026 14:53

Rikkitic: Hindus and Buddhists might have a problem with that.

Nope. For one, the Hindu religious svastika points clockwise. The stolen version does not. There are many many additional differences.