Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.




51 posts

Master Geek


Topic # 88590 18-Aug-2011 15:23
Send private message

I'm making a documentary for my course, interviewing a couple list MPs and a certain party co-leader on the topic of democracy.
I want to use clips from Parliament TV, but copyright is an issue. I have no idea who the copyright belongs to, and if I can use it without written consent, or if not, under fair use.
Can anyone help me out?

Create new topic
3510 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 985


  Reply # 508624 18-Aug-2011 15:33
Send private message

Write to the the office of the Speaker in Parliament and ask them...

Office of the Speaker
Parliament House
Wellington 6160
New Zealand


I suspect if it a non-commercial project you should have no problems, but they are the arbiters of all things to do with parliament....

861 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 137

Trusted

  Reply # 508626 18-Aug-2011 15:55
Send private message

Also be aware that  footage is placed on youtube via the inthehouse.co.nz web site for public viewing.

regards

Knoydart (one of the Technical managers at PTV)

NB views expressed here are personal and not of my employer

 
 
 
 


259 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 70


  Reply # 508632 18-Aug-2011 16:07
Send private message

Well thats an easy one, copyright is owned by us the tax payer. You have my permission to use and abuse any footage from the debating chamber



51 posts

Master Geek


  Reply # 508636 18-Aug-2011 16:14
Send private message

I'd love to say that was true, but I know it's not. I don't usually give credit to the United States government, but they sure got that one right, especially when you see the dissemination of photos from NASA that otherwise would've been under copyright and would've had a far more restricted audience.

42 posts

Geek
+1 received by user: 11


  Reply # 508641 18-Aug-2011 16:26
Send private message

You could always use the Daily Mail's defense - which is that anything on the internet is in the public domain.

http://www.bjp-online.com/british-journal-of-photography/news/1931880/daily-mail-sued-copyright-infringement

What license is the Parliament TV footage released under on youtube?

Youtube does have a Creative Commons license available - I'd have thought that as it is "our" parliament - a CC license would be a natural fit.

Then again - this current parliament did pass Skynet....

42 posts

Geek
+1 received by user: 11


  Reply # 508648 18-Aug-2011 16:31
Send private message

Here are terms and conditions from inthehouse.co.nz

Terms and Conditions

[View]

Following are the terms and conditions for the use of the video and audio of the House of Representatives as set out in Appendix D of the Standing Orders.

Live coverage of the proceedings of the House of Representatives is made available for television broadcast, webcast, and recording in other mediums to provide greater public access to the legislature. The coverage is made available on the following conditions:

1. Any broadcast or rebroadcast of coverage must comply with Broadcasting Standards Authority rules.
2. Coverage of proceedings must not be used in any medium for - political advertising or election campaigning (except with the permission of all members shown) satire, ridicule or denigration, commercial sponsorship or commercial advertising.
3. Reports that use extracts of coverage of proceedings and purport to be summaries must be fair and accurate.

Breach of these conditions may result in a loss of access to coverage, and may be treated as a contempt of the House of Representatives and proceeded against accordingly.

Absolute freedom of speech (privilege) applies to members speaking in the House of Representatives. Further publication (including broadcast or webcast) of these proceedings does not have the same legal protection. If you are in doubt about the content that you wish to publish, you should seek your own legal advice.

861 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 137

Trusted

  Reply # 508649 18-Aug-2011 16:33
Send private message

I´m guessing that fair use of the material will apply in your case but the office of the Speaker will let you know.
If you do use footage in your work, it helps to promote the house and TV coverage, which is a win all round.

Let us know how you get on.

3510 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 985


  Reply # 508654 18-Aug-2011 16:40
Send private message

knoydart: I´m guessing that fair use of the material will apply in your case


Probably, but  the inthhouse files on Youtube are tagged with the "standard youtube license" as opposed to creative commons, so you will need the publishers permission to reuse it...- whether those above T&Cs constitute an express permission I am not sure, So yeah default to the ask the speaker path .....:)

3044 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 467

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 508706 18-Aug-2011 19:03
Send private message

Interesting that it's not under Crown Copyright, which seems to me to be more reasonable (and even more liberal than Creative Commons).

Create new topic



Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.