Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.
Please note this sub-forum does not provide professional finance advice. You should seek advice from a licensed financial advisor.

To post in this sub-forum you must have made 100 posts or have Trust status or have completed our ID Verification.

If investing please consider our affiliate link for new accounts: Sharesies.



View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7
tweake
2641 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1137


  #3408803 30-Aug-2025 14:18
Send private message

eracode:

 

tweake:

 

sorry but the stats say kiwis buy houses to make short term profit.

 

 

That’s simply incorrect.

 

In a previous life I worked in banking and know a bit about residential mortgage lending. Anyone doing what you claim would almost always borrow to do so. The number of borrowers buying to ‘flip’ is minuscule.

 

Apart from that, in personal experience in ~55 years as an adult, thinking about everyone I’ve known who has bought and sold houses, I’ve never known anyone to do this. People do buy houses to live in them.

 

There will be a small number of people who want to flip but not the number implied by your generalisation.

 

 

average home ownership was down to 5 years. thats flipping. i would still call the typical nz average of 7 years flipping. 




mattwnz
20515 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4795


  #3408804 30-Aug-2025 14:39
Send private message

tweake:

 

cddt:

 

My parents have made it clear I should expect nothing when they die, I do not expect anything, and will not raise my children to expect anything either. 

 

 

thats a major problem with nz, and it shows the attitude. 

 

the big difference between the haves and have nots is generational wealth. using the wealth of the last generation to build your own and in turn pass that on so its built on. money makes money.

 

to many kiwis simply take from the next generation to fund their own lifestyle leaving nothing behind.

 

 

 

 

Intergenerational wealth, and leaving wealth to future generations of the family is seen an inspirational thing to do, at least in some countries like the US. There are some very big family owned global businesses that have been owned by families for over a century. In NZ it isn’t as much of a thing, but there are still some very old family owned businesses , including farms. Basically if you are born into the families, you are expected to live that lifestyle and work in the business.  Also when someone is wealthy, the compound interest effect means that they get more and more wealthy. 


mattwnz
20515 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4795


  #3408805 30-Aug-2025 14:42
Send private message

Senecio:

 

cddt:

 

My parents have made it clear I should expect nothing when they die, I do not expect anything, and will not raise my children to expect anything either. 

 

 

I will be very dissapointed if my parents leave me anything. Sounds like they are listening as they are off on another cruise next week. I only ask that they don't leave me any bills!

 

 

 

 

IANAL But I understand their unpaid bills and debts would be taken out of their remaining estate and if they have nothing left,  then that would be the end of it. 




mudguard
2327 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1250


  #3408806 30-Aug-2025 14:44
Send private message

tweake:

 

average home ownership was down to 5 years. thats flipping. i would still call the typical nz average of 7 years flipping. 

 

 

So what kind of profit is being made with a 5 year turnover, agent and lawyer fees each time it's being sold less the cost of servicing in the meantime? Less moving costs and so on.

 

It will be absolutely minimal.


tweake
2641 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1137


  #3408813 30-Aug-2025 16:07
Send private message

mudguard:

 

So what kind of profit is being made with a 5 year turnover, agent and lawyer fees each time it's being sold less the cost of servicing in the meantime? Less moving costs and so on.

 

It will be absolutely minimal.

 

 

no idea of net profits, but it must be enough that they keep doing it. but then again look at the increase in house prices, especially at the bottom end.


Handle9
11925 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 9676

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #3408815 30-Aug-2025 16:11
Send private message

tweake:

 

mudguard:

 

So what kind of profit is being made with a 5 year turnover, agent and lawyer fees each time it's being sold less the cost of servicing in the meantime? Less moving costs and so on.

 

It will be absolutely minimal.

 

 

no idea of net profits, but it must be enough that they keep doing it. but then again look at the increase in house prices, especially at the bottom end.

 

 

 

 

So in summary. You are extrapolating an entire market model from a single data point. This market model is based on profit motive but you don’t have any idea on the net profit. 

The vast majority of people on this thread don’t know anyone who changed houses for “profit” but know many who changed houses as their circumstances changed. 


 
 
 

Shop now on AliExpress (affiliate link).
mudguard
2327 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1250


  #3408819 30-Aug-2025 16:22
Send private message

tweake:

 

no idea of net profits, but it must be enough that they keep doing it. but then again look at the increase in house prices, especially at the bottom end.

 

 

But you have to consider that the seller has to then buy again in the same market. Unless they are consistently downsizing or moving towns which obviously isn't possible multiple times. 

 

If you buy for $500k, sell five years later at $625k, where are you buying? With the requirement of two salaries to pay a mortgage, then the risk of redundancy or even a job change might mean a sale. 

 

 


eracode
Smpl Mnmlst
9333 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 6203

ID Verified
Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #3408820 30-Aug-2025 16:37
Send private message

Tweake:

 

average home ownership was down to 5 years. thats flipping. i would still call the typical nz average of 7 years flipping. 

 

 

Flipping involves buying with the specific intention of reselling quickly, often after making value-adding improvements (renovations, repairs, or even just cosmetic work) - to realise a profit.

 

A generally accepted period for this is a few months or up to a year. Seven years is not even close to flipping - it’s people selling and buying homes for lifestyle or other reasons.





Sometimes I just sit and think. Other times I just sit.


tweake
2641 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1137


  #3408875 30-Aug-2025 17:21
Send private message

mudguard:

 

tweake:

 

no idea of net profits, but it must be enough that they keep doing it. but then again look at the increase in house prices, especially at the bottom end.

 

 

But you have to consider that the seller has to then buy again in the same market. Unless they are consistently downsizing or moving towns which obviously isn't possible multiple times. 

 

If you buy for $500k, sell five years later at $625k, where are you buying? With the requirement of two salaries to pay a mortgage, then the risk of redundancy or even a job change might mean a sale. 

 

 

 

 

this is where you play the RE game. its usually a move up the property ladder. move to a house you think will go up in value or you can do something to it to increase its value. buying in the same market is not really an issue, as long as the step is up. if there is no step up, you sit and wait until there is, but thats another conversation.

 

yes there is risks. especially if you over extend and can't sit and wait. but most of the time the risk is small. even the gfc was just a blip, prices bounced right back and continued like nothing had happened.


tweake
2641 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1137


  #3408877 30-Aug-2025 17:29
Send private message

eracode:

 

tweake:

 

average home ownership was down to 5 years. thats flipping. i would still call the typical nz average of 7 years flipping. 

 

 

Flipping involves buying with the specific intention of reselling quickly, often after making value-adding improvements (renovations, repairs, or even just cosmetic work) - to realise a profit.

 

A generally accepted period for this is a few months or up to a year. Seven years is not even close to flipping - it’s people selling and buying homes for lifestyle or other reasons.

 

 

thats where i disagree. remember that its a seven year AVERAGE. so there is LOTS of people who sell far sooner than that (as other people have owned the same house for 40-50 years).

 

also what happened in the covid boom when there was lots more profit and soaring house prices, the average dropped to around 5 years. its not just "people moving for lifestyle reasons".


mudguard
2327 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1250


  #3408884 30-Aug-2025 18:20
Send private message

tweake:

 

this is where you play the RE game. its usually a move up the property ladder. move to a house you think will go up in value or you can do something to it to increase its value. buying in the same market is not really an issue, as long as the step is up. if there is no step up, you sit and wait until there is, but thats another conversation.

 

 

 

 

I don't think it's really that economical. Here's some back of envelope maths. 

 

Year One buy house 25 year term

 

$500,000 with $100,000 deposit assuming conservative interest rate of 6% (should really use 8%)

 

$400,000 loan

 

 

 

After five years sell for 

 

$625,000.

 

Loan repayments total $126,000

 

$264,497 equity.

 

 

 

Buy for $781,250 (no point getting something similar)

 

$516,753 loan over 20 year term 

 

 

 

After ten years sell for 

 

$976,562

 

Loan repayments total $218,428

 

$536,340 equity 

 

 

 

And so on. And that's assuming a 25% increase every five years. 

 

 

 

Not including any other costs, insurances, agent fees, moving, lawyer fees.

 

 

 

I'd argue this is probably what a few kiwis do. Move up, owe more, equity increases until they get to the point where they still have a big mortgage but sell and clear it and downsize to another town. Never actually realising the gain until the end. 


 
 
 

Move to New Zealand's best fibre broadband service (affiliate link). Free setup code: R587125ERQ6VE. Note that to use Quic Broadband you must be comfortable with configuring your own router.
eracode
Smpl Mnmlst
9333 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 6203

ID Verified
Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #3408906 31-Aug-2025 01:54
Send private message

Tweake:

 

eracode:

 

Tweake:

 

average home ownership was down to 5 years. thats flipping. i would still call the typical nz average of 7 years flipping. 

 

 

Flipping involves buying with the specific intention of reselling quickly, often after making value-adding improvements (renovations, repairs, or even just cosmetic work) - to realise a profit.

 

A generally accepted period for this is a few months or up to a year. Seven years is not even close to flipping - it’s people selling and buying homes for lifestyle or other reasons.

 

 

thats where i disagree. remember that its a seven year AVERAGE. so there is LOTS of people who sell far sooner than that (as other people have owned the same house for 40-50 years).

 

 

In effect you said ‘seven years is flipping’. 

It’s demonstrably not - and when you get called out on that, you start talking about shorter periods. 

 

Even with some shorter periods implied by the average duration, the number of sales that would be within the ‘less than a year’ associated with flipping, would be tiny. And certainly nowhere near enough to fit with your sweeping generalisation that (quote) “kiwis buy houses to make short term profit”.

 

As an indication, assume that the duration of home ownership is normally distributed around a mean (average) of seven years and with 99% confidence limits of zero and, say, 15 years.

 

The portion of the duration curve that falls between zero and one year - i.e. the period associated with flipping - is approximately 1.5%. 

 

This would mean that about 1.5% of houses are resold within the first year of purchase. Not all of these sales are necessarily flipping ‘for profit’ - some sales will be for other reasons like a deceased estate or a marital breakup. The number of actual flips may well be close to (or less than) 1% - it’s far from common. 

 

Time to get off your hobby horse.





Sometimes I just sit and think. Other times I just sit.


LookingUp
440 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 88


  #3410392 2-Sep-2025 10:54
Send private message

From the early 2000's my wife and I grew a small portfolio of rental properties.  Over the last few years we've sold them all off, as the financial returns just aren't as good anymore, a couple of problem tenants soured us on the idea, and we're (currently at least) doing a lot better on the stock market.  We never really made money out of the rent (you'd be lucky to get 3-5% capital value p.a.), but certainly did ok with capital gains, which was the ONLY thing that made the investment worthwhile beyond a "feel good" for providing affordable social housing.

The point of my post is this - the last house we sold, we sold directly to a developer.  We got good money for it because they'd bought the house next door, and the economics of building units across two sections are way better than what can be achieved with a single section.  The sale had zero commission, and only a couple of grand for legal.  A WINNER.

If we were to go back into rentals (which I can't see at the moment) it would be with an eye to snapping up properties that will be potential development opportunities beyond the bright-line test.  Where we are in Christchurch there is plenty of opportunity for this in older suburbs that are undergoing renewal.  It would be kind of like Monopoly - try to get at least a couple in a row, and then seek a buyer for the package.  Unless going big-time it's not worth developing the properties oneself, as capital gains on that are taxed regardless, it's not a job for the faint hearted, and you're betting on future resale that may or may not be there.


JayADee
2236 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 483


  #3410417 2-Sep-2025 13:58
Send private message

We’re looking around for a place to downsize to after over 20 years in ours.

 

 It’s so far been hard to find anything that suits us. Looking for a small (90-100m2) but tidy freehold 2-3 bedrooms with preferably the ol’ quarter acre section, carport and shed/garage that gets decent sun. Don’t mind a little tidy up needed but nothing structural. Very hard to find something that ticks all that.

 

Seems to be less competition around so you can take a little more time to look. I suppose that’s one good thing.

 

I really like my house so we’re not moving unless we find one we like a lot. 


cddt
1970 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1904


  #3410476 2-Sep-2025 15:38
Send private message

JayADee:

 

Looking for a small (90-100m2) but tidy freehold 2-3 bedrooms with preferably the ol’ quarter acre section, carport and shed/garage that gets decent sun. Don’t mind a little tidy up needed but nothing structural. 

 

 

Sounds exactly like our first home which we sold a couple of years ago. 





My referral links: BigPipeMercury


1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic








Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.