|
|
|
@MaxineN Yep appears to be the same underlying problem as most others here. I think between you, and others who have provided MTR's it's pointed out the dodgy device that needs attention.
Michael Murphy | https://murfy.nz
Referral Links: Quic Broadband (use R122101E7CV7Q for free setup)
Are you happy with what you get from Geekzone? Please consider supporting us by subscribing.
Opinions are my own and not the views of my employer.
The thing is Michael I'm not feeling the packet loss or seeing it as bad as the rest.
A dropped packet or two is not something I'd cry wolf about but the VPS MTR is absolutely sketch city and I think that's beyond Quic's control (happy to be corrected if they can steer the routing away).
I definitely need to get some of the Microsoft and equinix peers back in my smoke ping so I can see where else (as I do play a lot of valve games and their peer for Sydney is Equinix) this might be cropping up.
I'd rather my results not get used as a sample because I myself deem it inconclusive and I'm not catching it live on the MTRs vs the smoke pings.
20 ICMP pings every 300 seconds is very different to 1 a second.
Again happy to be corrected but to me I'm not finding a fault bar the horrible upstream mess with my VPS.
Ramblings from a mysterious lady who's into tech. Warning I may often create zingers.
MaxineN:
The thing is Michael I'm not feeling the packet loss or seeing it as bad as the rest.
A dropped packet or two is not something I'd cry wolf about but the VPS MTR is absolutely sketch city and I think that's beyond Quic's control (happy to be corrected if they can steer the routing away).
I definitely need to get some of the Microsoft and equinix peers back in my smoke ping so I can see where else (as I do play a lot of valve games and their peer for Sydney is Equinix) this might be cropping up.
I'd rather my results not get used as a sample because I myself deem it inconclusive and I'm not catching it live on the MTRs vs the smoke pings.
20 ICMP pings every 300 seconds is very different to 1 a second.
Again happy to be corrected but to me I'm not finding a fault bar the horrible upstream mess with my VPS.
Yeah, there's quite some heavy loss on the Mercury/Twelve99 route. I've brought this up with Quic but unfortunately, it's out of their control :(
Otherwise, outside of that, everything else looks fine on my end.
For context, here's a destination that is routed through Mercury/Twelve99.

ctv: Yeah, there's quite some heavy loss on the Mercury/Twelve99 route. I've brought this up with Quic but unfortunately, it's out of their control :(
Some light reading on this if you're interested: https://www.geekzone.co.nz/forums.asp?forumid=194&topicid=312225&page_no=1#3212167
saf:
I have had a bit of a look for you, and my poke around does hint to add weight to what @Lias has mentioned above.
There are a significant number of submarine cables cut currently between Asia and Europe. With this happening, carriers and providers are being forced to use paths with less capacity, or temporary measures in order to keep packets flowing, which causes congestion on the remaining paths that are working - but hey, moving most packets is better than no packets!
Fixing these cables is proving especially challenging, moreso than normal due to the instability in the region, needing military escorts and defense etc.
Doing some digging, it does look like RETN and/or their provider are striking this problem, which matches both in terms of the traffic path, and explains differences in time of day based on when the working path they're using is congested.
We have already completed some traffic engineering changes a month or so ago in order to route around points of significant congestion due to all the above with the elements we have control over, however we can't fix every path to everywhere, as we can't control the whole path to the remote destination.
Michael Murphy | https://murfy.nz
Referral Links: Quic Broadband (use R122101E7CV7Q for free setup)
Are you happy with what you get from Geekzone? Please consider supporting us by subscribing.
Opinions are my own and not the views of my employer.
I've been running MTR for a couple of hours at a 10s interval. Initially I was seeing 2-3x the packet loss from hops 3 and 4 but over the last couple of hours that seems to have evened it's self out
The most noticeable thing remaining is hop 5 is highly inconsistent (as13335.akl.ix.nz), it has ~3x the average latency of the other nodes, and significant variability (standard deviation of the latency is 10x the others). Based in Hamilton but seem to be going directly through Auckland (not sure if that is normal).
Cxxxxxe (xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx) -> 1.1.1.1 (1.1.1.1) 2024-05-06T21:46:51+1200
Keys: Help Display mode Restart statistics Order of fields quit
Packets Pings
Host Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst StDev
1. xxxxxxxxxx.lan 0.9% 1282 0.4 0.4 0.3 6.0 0.4
2. bng1-akl1.vetta.net 0.6% 1281 4.6 3.9 3.0 17.8 0.8
3. xe1-2100-146.pe2-akl1.vetta.net 0.8% 1281 4.2 4.3 3.0 66.0 2.0
4. xe1-2100-502.core1-akl2.vetta.net 1.1% 1281 4.0 4.3 3.1 78.8 2.3
5. as13335.akl.ix.nz 1.0% 1281 5.6 13.7 3.9 166.3 22.8
6. one.one.one.one 0.8% 1281 4.8 4.9 3.3 169.4 6.7
Still being dogged this. Just got an invoice from Quic and it's salt in the wound. I don't feel great at all being on the backlog when I'm still getting constant micro outages. Has a customer presentation today and it cut right in the middle.
@quic
Quic referral: https://account.quic.nz/refer/415133
squareeyes123: Still being dogged this. Just got an invoice from Quic and it's salt in the wound. I don't feel great at all being on the backlog when I'm still getting constant micro outages. Has a Custer presentation today and it cut right in the middle.
@quic
Referral Link: | Quic Broadband (use R142206E0L2CR for free setup)
Quic Broadband
quic.nz - The telco who puts you in charge!
I'm prepared to entertain the idea it's local out of desperation, but it just seems wrong to me.
Other info
Setup
Things I'll check
Quic referral: https://account.quic.nz/refer/415133
@quic
>Whilst very early days, we are hearing some reports from customers using Ubiquiti devices (namely UDM's)
OK this is the smoking gun I need. And I really, really wish I had thought of trying to revert back to PPPoE a week ago. Looks like I had the idea the same time you dropped in. Will report back.
Quic referral: https://account.quic.nz/refer/415133
@quic by the way I'm happy to help test if you need
Quic referral: https://account.quic.nz/refer/415133
@squareeyes123 The problem is the micro outages don't seem to be happening to me anymore or to many others and I am not even picking them up myself like I could before - as I've mentioned a number of times now yours does seem to be dropping far more often than anyone else and you're using a dream machine.
Whilst very early days, we are hearing some reports from customers using Ubiquiti devices (namely UDM's) which seem to be using the WAN DHCP lease with a 60 minute lease time, while we issue 20 minute leases. This causes the device not to renew its lease at the half-way point, and instead expire and get a new lease at expiry, which in turn causes a micro outage. We're not sure if this is a recent update or what at this stage.
Could be coincidental perhaps to a firmware update released by Ubiquiti? But perhaps look at logs from your dream machine. Remember, this is a residential service also and dream machines for me anyway have been problematic on other providers too. I'll be interested to know if this can be manually changed.
Michael Murphy | https://murfy.nz
Referral Links: Quic Broadband (use R122101E7CV7Q for free setup)
Are you happy with what you get from Geekzone? Please consider supporting us by subscribing.
Opinions are my own and not the views of my employer.
Just want to confirm so I'm not going mad.

I am pretty sure we're not meant to be seeing packet loss at the BNG.
I have also stood up some other targets more focused on IX and traffic going out of Vetta.
Out of curiosity. @quic xe1-2600-218.pe2-chc4.vetta.net is this port being looked at? Mostly because in most of the MTRs this is where I see the packet loss start. Although below 4% when it happens and over an 8 hour period I saw 0.1% to Cloudflare Auckland from running it this morning before going to work, I am noticing that the route out is where the packet loss starts.
Ramblings from a mysterious lady who's into tech. Warning I may often create zingers.
@MaxineN Pretty normal and common practise for network equipment to rate limit ICMP and I know it’s the case with Quic/Vetta also.
Michael Murphy | https://murfy.nz
Referral Links: Quic Broadband (use R122101E7CV7Q for free setup)
Are you happy with what you get from Geekzone? Please consider supporting us by subscribing.
Opinions are my own and not the views of my employer.
Understand that part.
But except from the 2nd of May's small packet loss there were no packets dropped until the above screenshot today from 1:50ish pm
Hence my question of am I going mad?
Ramblings from a mysterious lady who's into tech. Warning I may often create zingers.
|
|
|