Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.




2326 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 478


Topic # 45694 3-Nov-2009 23:37
Send private message

theres been a lot of discussion on HDMI cables and this week on Fair Go they are doing a story on the price of cables and are they worth it, looks like they go undercover in a big store (Harvey Normans ?) and they come to the same conclusion most people have. could be interesting

View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
 1 | 2
3545 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 121

Trusted

  Reply # 269828 3-Nov-2009 23:52
Send private message

Definitely not worth it!

Spend as little as you can on HDMI cables. The expensive ones may last longer or give you slightly better sound / picture quality but seriously, it often is not visible to the naked eye.

3252 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 207

Trusted

  Reply # 269837 4-Nov-2009 00:56
Send private message

heavenly_wild: Definitely not worth it!

Spend as little as you can on HDMI cables. The expensive ones may last longer or give you slightly better sound / picture quality but seriously, it often is not visible to the naked eye.

Huh?

 
 
 
 


8020 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 384

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 269844 4-Nov-2009 01:54
Send private message

HDMI is digital so there is no sound/picture quality difference at all. 

You probably wouldn't want a badly made cheap cable where the wiring gets damaged if the cable is bent slightly but that shouldn't be a major concern really.

554 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 60


  Reply # 269856 4-Nov-2009 06:55
Send private message

Consumer tested HDMI and TOSLINK cables in Jan 2009 and pretty much came to the same conclusion - that cheap cables do much the same job as more expensive ones.

For those that have access, the results are here: http://www.consumer.org.nz/reports/high-definition-cables

2113 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 202


  Reply # 269859 4-Nov-2009 07:13
Send private message

The Consumer test method only managed to get differences in performance by daisy chaining the cables out past 26 metres. Foolishly they ranked the cables with scores between 8.7 - 9.4 for picture. Choice, the Australian magazine used the same results but just said that there was no difference in performance.

xpd

Runnin' and Gunnin'
8117 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1032

Mod Emeritus
Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 269869 4-Nov-2009 08:13
Send private message

Paid about $11 for my cable. I didnt watch Fair Go, but I assume they got some salesperson doing the "gold connectors, higher frequncies" etc routine ?




XPD / @DemiseNZ / Gavin
 
Corsair Carbide SPEC-02 / Corsair VS550 / G.SKILL Ripjaws X 8GB / Zotac 760GTX AMP! / ASUS H81M-E / Intel Pentium K Anniversay G3258

 

Internet provided by : Voyager - VDSL 68/13  -  Musical Support by : Like A Storm - Visual Entertainment by : Plex and Steam and Overwatch


264 posts

Ultimate Geek
Inactive user


  Reply # 269871 4-Nov-2009 08:28
Send private message

Funny thing about gold connectors is that most peoples equipment that the cables are plugged into aren't gold, so it doesnt really matter.

136 posts

Master Geek


  Reply # 269874 4-Nov-2009 08:33
Send private message

8d52797c436: Funny thing about gold connectors is that most peoples equipment that the cables are plugged into aren't gold, so it doesnt really matter.


This :) i got a $13 cable, it goes from DVI-D to HDMI that i run my media center to my 55" lcd looks fantatic :) (its even gold lololol)

2260 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted

  Reply # 269876 4-Nov-2009 08:36
Send private message

ATinyChipmunk:
8d52797c436: Funny thing about gold connectors is that most peoples equipment that the cables are plugged into aren't gold, so it doesnt really matter.


This :) i got a $13 cable, it goes from DVI-D to HDMI that i run my media center to my 55" lcd looks fantatic :) (its even gold lololol)



haha same :) all my high end audio connecting to my TVs/dvr/PS3 are all stock $7 cables :S

Even my subwoofer and component surround cables are:

A a pack of component cables from the warehouse(laser branded) @ $10, stripped them into 3, one for the subwoofer, one for the DVR coax-digital, one for the Xbox coax-digital.  seriously no difference between spending on them and a supposed "Monster" cable





I have moved across the ditch.  Now residing in Melbourne as a VOIP/Video Technical Trainer/Engineer. 

1956 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 326

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 269878 4-Nov-2009 09:00
Send private message

vinnieg:
ATinyChipmunk:
8d52797c436: Funny thing about gold connectors is that most peoples equipment that the cables are plugged into aren't gold, so it doesnt really matter.


This :) i got a $13 cable, it goes from DVI-D to HDMI that i run my media center to my 55" lcd looks fantatic :) (its even gold lololol)



haha same :) all my high end audio connecting to my TVs/dvr/PS3 are all stock $7 cables :S

Even my subwoofer and component surround cables are:

A a pack of component cables from the warehouse(laser branded) @ $10, stripped them into 3, one for the subwoofer, one for the DVR coax-digital, one for the Xbox coax-digital.  seriously no difference between spending on them and a supposed "Monster" cable




Sorry to burst your bubble but for analogue better cables do make a difference. i.e. stereo interconnects and speaker wire.




When you live your life on Twitter and Facebook, and are only friends with like minded people on Twitter and Facebook, you are not living in the real world. You are living in a narcissistic echo chamber.

 


My thoughts are my own and are in no way representative of my employer.


2260 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted

  Reply # 269883 4-Nov-2009 09:06
Send private message

It's ok mate, you didn't burst it at all. I don't use any bad quality cables for analogue only digital(luckily I run no analogue at all on any of my TVs. I'm digital all the way :) even digital optical from my freeview TV to my amp, digital optical from my PS3, digital optical from my DVR, digital coax from my xbox. Then HDMI from each one into my receiver, then HDMI into my TV.

I'm only using the component leads with the same quality 75-ohm coax that normal coax leads have to go from the DVR to the receiver to transfer digital audio signals.

I would never use bad quality speaker wire, I agree speaker wire is definitely important. Especially with the long runs I have in my place. I use 12ga(i think it was 12) speaker wire throughout the house for my hifi system.


My speaker wire is good stuff, don't worry.

If i was actually running any RCA cables, then I would make the best ones I could....but I still would never buy anything Monster




I have moved across the ditch.  Now residing in Melbourne as a VOIP/Video Technical Trainer/Engineer. 

6430 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 488

Trusted

  Reply # 269896 4-Nov-2009 09:24
Send private message

Thing I've noticed are the connectors at the ends.  I saw those cheap ones Jaycar had (4 for $32 or something) and they did look/feel a bit flimsy at the ends.

At the end of the day most people aren't watching TV's in industrial plantrooms with severe levels of noise/interferance being generated.  I tend to opt for the start at the cheaper end and work your way up if you experience problems.

I have 10m run to my projector via $30 (second hand off trademe) dick smith cable.  It's pretty thick, has nice shiny gold ends, but more importantly it works great.  If it didn't work great I'd have to look at an inline amp, or a better cable.

Past a certain point with digital, if the signals well enough protected, it's not going to get any better is it.  If you achieve sufficient signal quality/transmission with a $10 cable, a $250 cable is not going to change much.

Analogue video/sub/line level RCA cables I tend to make my own cables out of RG59 as this is better suited for this task than RG6.

2069 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 327


  Reply # 269897 4-Nov-2009 09:30
Send private message

Well it really comes down to how much snake oil is enough!

I have used the manufacturer supplied HDMI leads plus a TM purchased jobbie to connect my HT all with very acceptable results.

Despite the "it's digital so doesn't matter" I still chose the chunkiest best looking cheapie i could find on TM and paid maybe $19 instead of $10 purely as a feel good measure and i suspect quite a few people would do the saem and buy nice cables not for the measurable difference but for the cosmetics, let's be honest having nice thick cables with woven sheathesbles really can make a setup far more cosmetically appealling. This logic still does not justify Monsters pricing!

780 posts

Ultimate Geek
Inactive user


  Reply # 269898 4-Nov-2009 09:31
Send private message

There was some mention that higher priced cables are more likely to support the most recent version of the HDMI spec, which requires higher bandwidth that some older cables may not support.

But, I still think this is an attempt to confuse. Most people would not notice the difference between HDMI versions.

I fix stuff!
1538 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 233

Trusted
Vocus
Subscriber

  Reply # 269900 4-Nov-2009 09:37
Send private message

There is some proof that the more expensive cables work better over long distances (10m+)

But since 99% of us don't need 10M+ its pointless.

I tend do avoid the cheap HDMI cables and pay a bit more for the build quality. I move my cables around lots, the cheap ones tend to break and die.


 1 | 2
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic



Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:





News »

Nothing nebulous about Microsoft’s cloud-transition
Posted 21-Jul-2017 15:34


We’re spending more on tech, but not as much as Australians
Posted 21-Jul-2017 11:43


Endace announces EndaceFabric for network-wide packet recording
Posted 20-Jul-2017 20:49


Acorn 6: MacOS image editing for the rest of us
Posted 20-Jul-2017 17:04


HTC faces backlash over keyboard pop-up ads
Posted 19-Jul-2017 15:53


BNZ adds Visa credit cards to Android Pay wallet
Posted 18-Jul-2017 19:44


Still living in a Notification hell – Om Malik
Posted 18-Jul-2017 13:00


Duet Display uses iPad to extend Mac, PC
Posted 18-Jul-2017 10:58


PC sales could be worse
Posted 17-Jul-2017 07:34


Crypto-currencies, tulips, market bubbles
Posted 17-Jul-2017 06:38


NZ Tech Podcast: Big batteries, solar cars, cold war, IoT
Posted 16-Jul-2017 16:53


Vodafone Australia mulls Wisp alliance, NZ implications
Posted 13-Jul-2017 16:49


Rural health professionals see fibre pay-off
Posted 13-Jul-2017 11:52


Vodafone announces expansion of $5 Daily Roaming
Posted 13-Jul-2017 10:20


Intel unveils powerful Intel Xeon Scalable processors
Posted 12-Jul-2017 20:41



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.