A word to the wise > Jaffa please read

Forums › Spark New Zealand (including Skinny and BigPipe) › A word to the wise > Jaffa please read

Felix

344 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 1

Trusted

#8203 12-Jun-2006 14:10

Hi Jaffa,

I've tried PMing you, as well as asking you to contact me in the forums. You should be aware that putting

"Comments I make in posts are my own views and findings and do NOT reflect my place of employment in any way!"

Will not absolve you, and does not allow you to post sensitive material on GZ. As a heads up, you're skating on very thin ice. I'd recommend you think very carefully about the contents of your posts.

Felix 5ive

1 | 2 | 3

307 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 20

Trusted

#38278 12-Jun-2006 14:34

I think it's about time for full disclosure on Geekzone.

If you work for a company in an industry you're commenting on you should be required to state so in your signature or not comment.

Cheers.

Jama

1420 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1

Trusted

#38285 12-Jun-2006 14:40

mike: I think it's about time for full disclosure on Geekzone.

If you work for a company in an industry you're commenting on you should be required to state so in your signature or not comment.

Cheers.

Great idea - GZ would be reduced to Mauricio and a three legged dog! Obviously you are a Labour supporter...

cokemaster

Exited
4937 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1089

Retired Mod

Trusted

Lifetime subscriber

#38287 12-Jun-2006 14:45

I thought it was fairly obvious given the disclaimed on their sigs and the tendency to have a bit of bias on the posts... It makes them quite easy to point them out.

While it may sound a good idea its probably going to make people think twice before taking part, namely due to the hassle and due to the possible 'Well you're a registered telecom (or other telco) employeee you're views count for nothing'.

Its a slippery slope though. If we make employees of telcos register, whats next? Users of the services have to register to remove 'potential bias'?

webhosting

Loose lips may sink ships - Be smart - Don't post internal/commercially sensitive or confidential information!

Felix

344 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 1

Trusted

#38288 12-Jun-2006 14:45

whilst I admire your sence of humour Jama, I'm actually inclined to agree with Mike... whilst no one here is annonomouys, it would save time in tracking down people who post information that may be viewed as illegal, or in conflict with their employment contracts...

johnr

19282 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2526
Inactive user

#38289 12-Jun-2006 14:47

How would this be enforced

Maybe kelly2626 could suggest an idea here

Jama

1420 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1

Trusted

#38290 12-Jun-2006 14:48

Better still lets microchip all GZ'ers. It only costs $60.

Apple TV

Stream your favourite shows now on Apple TV (affiliate link).

bradstewart

4338 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 166

Retired Mod

Trusted

Lifetime subscriber

#38291 12-Jun-2006 14:50

The slippery slope allright, once it comes to that you will find employers requesting users be banned. People just need to learn what to and what not to say regarding information of their areas of work.

If you know that your employer wouldnt agree with you posting certain info, then dont, its really simple

Felix

344 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 1

Trusted

#38292 12-Jun-2006 14:51

I supose I was just being lazy... flag the identfy yourself thing, there are other ways to find out who people really are in the forums, anyway, this was intended as a heads up to jaffa rather than anything else...

lokinz

298 posts

Ultimate Geek
Inactive user

#38293 12-Jun-2006 14:51

Jama: Better still lets microchip all GZ'ers. It only costs $60.

Where do I sign up?

bradstewart

4338 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 166

Retired Mod

Trusted

Lifetime subscriber

#38294 12-Jun-2006 14:51

Jama: Better still lets microchip all GZ'ers. It only costs $60.

Im sure there are vets who would be willing to do it.

freitasm

BDFL - Memuneh
80654 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 41050

Administrator

ID Verified

Trusted

Geekzone

Lifetime subscriber

#38296 12-Jun-2006 15:01

Hmmm. Yes, and no. Unless you are being a troll. I always wanted to have one "official" participant from each operator, but they refuse to make their appearance. Perhaps too much scrutiny here. Or too many diverse opinions.

Referral links: Quic Broadband (free setup code: R587125ERQ6VE) | Samsung | AliExpress | Wise | Sharesies

Support Geekzone by subscribing (browse ads-free), or making a one-off or recurring donation through PressPatron.

HP

Shop now for HP laptops and other devices (affiliate link).

freitasm

BDFL - Memuneh
80654 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 41050

Administrator

ID Verified

Trusted

Geekzone

Lifetime subscriber

#38298 12-Jun-2006 15:03

And yes, having an "official" voice from an operator wouldn't have to exclude other employees reading/posting here. I don't think we need policing around, except for the already discussed disclosure of commercial sensitive information.

Referral links: Quic Broadband (free setup code: R587125ERQ6VE) | Samsung | AliExpress | Wise | Sharesies

Support Geekzone by subscribing (browse ads-free), or making a one-off or recurring donation through PressPatron.

geekiegeek

2513 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 625
Inactive user

#38299 12-Jun-2006 15:07

mmmm don’t think my contract has a "don’t post to forums" clause. Freedom of speech? So long as you are not divulging company secrets, i.e. insider trading then surely you can say what you want as an individual.

Just my personal feeling - dont know if its lawfull.

Jama

1420 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1

Trusted

#38301 12-Jun-2006 15:10

Felix: whilst I admire your sence of humour Jama, I'm actually inclined to agree with Mike... whilst no one here is annonomouys, it would save time in tracking down people who post information that may be viewed as illegal, or in conflict with their employment contracts...

Good idea Felix as they could also be downloader's of dodgy illegal content like music and movies. Knowing who they are we could then conceivably dob them into the music/move business and MS.

I think MS actually pays out money on successful convictions. We could use the money to fund an annual GZ knees up (for those of us left).

freitasm

BDFL - Memuneh
80654 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 41050

Administrator

ID Verified

Trusted

Geekzone

Lifetime subscriber

#38303 12-Jun-2006 15:17

And that's the whole thing, isn't it? You may remember previous episodes where confidential information was disclosed, and we were asked by the rightful owner(s) to have that removed.

This is different from someone posting personal views in a public forum or a personal blog.

While a company such as Telecom NZ or Vodafone, or any other, may think "Gosh, what people will think of us, since one of our valuable collaborator(TM) is saying this in public?" I really think they all should read the Cluetrain Manifesto and join the party.

Seriously though, if the blog is not hosted on the company's dime, or the forum is a separate entity, I wouldn't see anything bad on people writing their opinions.

However, while here on Geekzone, if the post does not conform with the forum usage guidelines then it will be locked, or removed.

We don't need Thoughts Police® here, but we need standards.

Referral links: Quic Broadband (free setup code: R587125ERQ6VE) | Samsung | AliExpress | Wise | Sharesies

Support Geekzone by subscribing (browse ads-free), or making a one-off or recurring donation through PressPatron.

1 | 2 | 3