![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Rural IT and Broadband support.
Broadband troubleshooting and master filter installs.
Starlink installer - one month free: https://www.starlink.com/?referral=RC-32845-88860-71
Wi-Fi and networking
Cel-Fi supply and installer - boost your mobile phone coverage legally
Need help in Auckland, Waikato or BoP? Click my email button, or email me direct: [my user name] at geekzonemail dot com
coffeebaron: Over to you Troy @hio77
There seems to be an external fault on the line causing disconnects when on the phone. There is a clean line in from master filter to DSL Jack-point and phone Jack-points. Alarm completely bypassed now.
on my list for monday morning :)
#include <std_disclaimer>
Any comments made are personal opinion and do not reflect directly on the position my current or past employers may have.
hio77:
coffeebaron: Over to you Troy @hio77
There seems to be an external fault on the line causing disconnects when on the phone. There is a clean line in from master filter to DSL Jack-point and phone Jack-points. Alarm completely bypassed now.
on my list for monday morning :)
Thanks, much appreciated.
I've whacked a monitor on it for 24 hours to make sure Fraser didn't break anything ;)
It's honestly looking Exceptionally better though. Copper is testing perfectly, attenuation has basically halved, speed as essentially doubled.
ddDLM hasnt reduced the profile yet, but it's already looking like it could break 18mbit if it gets down there.
Tiny bit of crosstalk showing, not that that's fixable!
bitloading and hlog is near perfect.
as i suspected when i initially replied, it wasnt clear if it was internal or not. could have been iver. Looks like it was indeed internal :)
Might give the port a little kick to see if ddDLM wants to speed up tomorrow for ya, It's at that stage that going VDSL at a strech would probably drop the upstream a tad and get 20-24mbit down.. (Distance isn't your friend of course)
#include <std_disclaimer>
Any comments made are personal opinion and do not reflect directly on the position my current or past employers may have.
hio77:
I've whacked a monitor on it for 24 hours to make sure Fraser didn't break anything ;)
It's honestly looking Exceptionally better though. Copper is testing perfectly, attenuation has basically halved, speed as essentially doubled.
ddDLM hasnt reduced the profile yet, but it's already looking like it could break 18mbit if it gets down there.
Tiny bit of crosstalk showing, not that that's fixable!
bitloading and hlog is near perfect.
as i suspected when i initially replied, it wasnt clear if it was internal or not. could have been iver. Looks like it was indeed internal :)
Might give the port a little kick to see if ddDLM wants to speed up tomorrow for ya, It's at that stage that going VDSL at a strech would probably drop the upstream a tad and get 20-24mbit down.. (Distance isn't your friend of course)
Thanks, that is great to know -- always suspected the internal wiring was poor. Appreciate the checks.
Cheers
Well i was going to jump in there and give things a bump, but looks like your already on the upgrade path :)
test results are crazy clean. surprised ddDLM didnt move the profile back down, but hey, it's the smart Engine not me...
It's probably still waiting out all the disconnections that happened prior to Frasers visit.
#include <std_disclaimer>
Any comments made are personal opinion and do not reflect directly on the position my current or past employers may have.
Mums connection has now been switched to VDSL.
Chorus reports the line speed at a whopping 42mbps -- far higher than I expected, so thanks to coffeebaron and hio77 for their help. Beats the old 5mbps that used to disconnect when phone calls are received.
surfisup1000:
Mums connection has now been switched to VDSL.
Chorus reports the line speed at a whopping 42mbps -- far higher than I expected, so thanks to coffeebaron and hio77 for their help. Beats the old 5mbps that used to disconnect when phone calls are received.
Yup, that vectoring is damn impressive.
Upload speed is kinda lackluster, but that's because of distance dropoff + no gains from vectoring.
When you look at the graphs, it's really quite impressive to see the gains. one of the better results i've personally seen.
#include <std_disclaimer>
Any comments made are personal opinion and do not reflect directly on the position my current or past employers may have.
|
![]() ![]() ![]() |