Get out the popcorn:-
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=10907233
Speedtest FibreX Max (via 5G WiFi)

|
|
|
Inphinity: I do agree it's confusing to consumers for VF to refer to their region-limited cable service as ultra fast broadband, as differing from the government-backed ultra-fast broadband initiative. I'm still not so sure what's so super about their network, either. They keep claiming it's "the best", and I'd like to see some data and statistics to support that. I'm not saying it isn't, necessarily, the best, but in my personal experience it is far from it, thus my interest.
Jaxar:
Is ultra fast broadband a brand name related to the fibre roll out as a particular product or is it a description of broadband which is faster than xDSL?
I'm a geek, a gamer, a dad, a Quic user, and an IT Professional. I have a full rack home lab, size 15 feet, an epic beard and Asperger's. I'm a bit of a Cypherpunk, who believes information wants to be free and the Net interprets censorship as damage and routes around it. If you use my Quic signup you can also use the code R570394EKGIZ8 for free setup. Opinions are my own and not the views of my employer.
Lias: I kind of think its sour grapes from Telecom to be honest.
Lias: I kind of think its sour grapes from Telecom to be honest.
Inphinity:Jaxar:
Is ultra fast broadband a brand name related to the fibre roll out as a particular product or is it a description of broadband which is faster than xDSL?
It's not necessarily whether there is or is not any sort of infringement on name usage, it's about misleading the consumer. There has been a lot of coverage and information around the government-backed ultra-fast broadband initiative, to then go and promote a different product under that banner will lead consumers to believe it is part of said government-backed initiative when it may not be.
sbiddle: I just think it's amazing that somebody in Telecom actually understands what Supernet is. Buy that man or woman a beer.
|
|
|