Plonking on Geekzone

Forums › Geekzone › Plonking on Geekzone

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6

3236 posts

Uber Geek

ID Verified

Trusted

#717223 14-Nov-2012 16:55

I'd be more in favor of being able to mute someone from further contributing to a given thread if they are given enough dislikes by others active in the thread.

'you have been banned from further contributing to this thread by a jury of your peers'

networkn

Networkn
32349 posts

Uber Geek

ID Verified

Trusted

Lifetime subscriber

#717231 14-Nov-2012 17:00

insane: I'd be more in favor of being able to mute someone from further contributing to a given thread if they are given enough dislikes by others active in the thread.

'you have been banned from further contributing to this thread by a jury of your peers'

I like this better, however I can see it just becoming very contentious. It's going to become very cliquey here.

Kyanar

4089 posts

Uber Geek

ID Verified

Trusted

#717270 14-Nov-2012 17:50

Personally, I'm more in favour of the "Ignore" functionality present in other commercial forum scripts. You can ignore a person, but all that happens is instead of seeing their posts you see "1 post(s) ignored from (user). Click here to show anyway" and if you click it the full post appears as if by magic (JS element hiding clearly ;))

networkn

Networkn
32349 posts

Uber Geek

ID Verified

Trusted

Lifetime subscriber

#717272 14-Nov-2012 17:52

Kyanar: Personally, I'm more in favour of the "Ignore" functionality present in other commercial forum scripts. You can ignore a person, but all that happens is instead of seeing their posts you see "1 post(s) ignored from (user). Click here to show anyway" and if you click it the full post appears as if by magic (JS element hiding clearly ;))

Much better!

surfisup1000

5288 posts

Uber Geek

#717277 14-Nov-2012 17:57

insane: I'd be more in favor of being able to mute someone from further contributing to a given thread if they are given enough dislikes by others active in the thread.

'you have been banned from further contributing to this thread by a jury of your peers'

Yeah, ban those with minority views.

I like it.

freitasm

BDFL - Memuneh
79250 posts

Uber Geek

Administrator

ID Verified

Trusted

Geekzone

Lifetime subscriber

#717288 14-Nov-2012 18:29

Kyanar: Personally, I'm more in favour of the "Ignore" functionality present in other commercial forum scripts. You can ignore a person, but all that happens is instead of seeing their posts you see "1 post(s) ignored from (user). Click here to show anyway" and if you click it the full post appears as if by magic (JS element hiding clearly ;))

Yes, that's more like what I was thinking. This is pretty much plonking anyway.

sonyxperiageek

2958 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted

#717289 14-Nov-2012 18:33

I wouldn't agree with Plonking, as someone said before, it causes tension and is sometimes confusing to read. Then people won't want to come back to GZ..:(

Sony

Equinox IT

Cloud spending continues to surge globally, but most organisations haven’t made the changes necessary to maximise the value and cost-efficiency benefits of their cloud investments. Download the whitepaper From Overspend to Advantage now.

Dratsab

3946 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted

Lifetime subscriber

#717291 14-Nov-2012 18:36

networkn:
Kyanar: Personally, I'm more in favour of the "Ignore" functionality present in other commercial forum scripts. You can ignore a person, but all that happens is instead of seeing their posts you see "1 post(s) ignored from (user). Click here to show anyway" and if you click it the full post appears as if by magic (JS element hiding clearly ;))

Much better!

Big +1 for this!

JamesL

956 posts

Ultimate Geek
Inactive user

#717292 14-Nov-2012 18:38

Kyanar: Personally, I'm more in favour of the "Ignore" functionality present in other commercial forum scripts. You can ignore a person, but all that happens is instead of seeing their posts you see "1 post(s) ignored from (user). Click here to show anyway" and if you click it the full post appears as if by magic (JS element hiding clearly ;))

+1

I was actually going to request this the other day but thought there wouldn't be much in favour

freitasm

BDFL - Memuneh
79250 posts

Uber Geek

Administrator

ID Verified

Trusted

Geekzone

Lifetime subscriber

#717294 14-Nov-2012 18:46

Hmmm. So what's the problem here then? "Plonk" in my view (and by definition) is when YOU put someone into an ignore list that is for YOUR use only, not affecting anyone else. That's what I was thinking, and that's what Kyanar suggested.

How can filtering your personal view can "create[s] tension on the forums"?

Linuxluver

5828 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted

Subscriber

#717295 14-Nov-2012 18:46

freitasm: Would you folks have use for a "PLONK" button here on Geekzone?

Only if we also get an "I told you so, but you wouldn't listen." button.

_____________________________________________________________________

I've been on Geekzone over 16 years..... Time flies....

JamesL

956 posts

Ultimate Geek
Inactive user

#717298 14-Nov-2012 18:48

freitasm: Hmmm. So what's the problem here then? "Plonk" in my view (and by definition) is when YOU put someone into an ignore list that is for YOUR use only, not affecting anyone else. That's what I was thinking, and that's what Kyanar suggested.

How can filtering your personal view can "create[s] tension on the forums"?

Maybe people think its visible to others, whereas it's only filtering what you see not others

freitasm

BDFL - Memuneh
79250 posts

Uber Geek

Administrator

ID Verified

Trusted

Geekzone

Lifetime subscriber

#717299 14-Nov-2012 18:48

As I said, I think people here are under the impressions that "plonk" applies to everyone's view, when in fact it's a user preference - a filtered view.