Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


freitasm

BDFL - Memuneh
80646 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 41030

Administrator
ID Verified
Trusted
Geekzone
Lifetime subscriber

#111774 14-Nov-2012 15:37
Send private message

Would you folks have use for a "PLONK" button here on Geekzone?







Referral links: Quic Broadband (free setup code: R587125ERQ6VE) | Samsung | AliExpress | Wise | Sharesies 

 

Support Geekzone by subscribing (browse ads-free), or making a one-off or recurring donation through PressPatron.

 


View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6
kiwitrc
4123 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 833
Inactive user


  #717140 14-Nov-2012 15:40
Send private message

Yes please!



networkn
Networkn
32862 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 15453

ID Verified
Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #717141 14-Nov-2012 15:40
Send private message

I think this would be a bad idea. It just creates tension on the forums. I would be against it.

mattRSK
822 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 3

Trusted

  #717146 14-Nov-2012 15:44
Send private message

I feel the moderators do a good enough job of removing plonkers.



kiwitrc
4123 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 833
Inactive user


  #717147 14-Nov-2012 15:44
Send private message

networkn: I think this would be a bad idea. It just creates tension on the forums. I would be against it.



*Plonk*

But seriously, I assume the posters ( I have a few in mind) dont know you are ignoring them?

networkn
Networkn
32862 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 15453

ID Verified
Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #717150 14-Nov-2012 15:46
Send private message

kiwitrc:
networkn: I think this would be a bad idea. It just creates tension on the forums. I would be against it.



*Plonk*

But seriously, I assume the posters ( I have a few in mind) dont know you are ignoring them?


It's not going to stop you seeing replies in quotes, and it just makes reading a thread confusing. 

It's not that I don't see the value in being able to ignore someone, but it's the same as your tv, don't like what's on it, change channels (Or threads).


kiwitrc
4123 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 833
Inactive user


  #717158 14-Nov-2012 15:50
Send private message

networkn:
kiwitrc:
networkn: I think this would be a bad idea. It just creates tension on the forums. I would be against it.



*Plonk*

But seriously, I assume the posters ( I have a few in mind) dont know you are ignoring them?


It's not going to stop you seeing replies in quotes, and it just makes reading a thread confusing. 

It's not that I don't see the value in being able to ignore someone, but it's the same as your tv, don't like what's on it, change channels (Or threads).



But some threads can have some good info in them, but are full of crap (I am thinking of a certain large and current thread you started), typically from the same few posters, it would be great to be able to not have to read the rubbish, or do I have the Plonk concept wrong?

 
 
 

Support Geekzone with one-off or recurring donations Donate via PressPatron.
ubergeeknz
3344 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1041

Trusted
Vocus

  #717161 14-Nov-2012 15:52
Send private message

I'm with networkn.  IMO any kind of system like this inevitably leads to grief and drama, something GZ manages to keep (largely) clear of as far as I can tell...

insane
3324 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1006

ID Verified
Trusted
2degrees
Subscriber

  #717162 14-Nov-2012 15:55
Send private message

occasionally a plonker does make a valid point, then you end up restating what they have said and look like a plonker too ;)

Unless it can be make per thread, it could get a little confusing.

networkn
Networkn
32862 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 15453

ID Verified
Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #717168 14-Nov-2012 16:03
Send private message

insane: occasionally a plonker does make a valid point, then you end up restating what they have said and look like a plonker too ;)

Unless it can be make per thread, it could get a little confusing.


Yup, too many downsides personally I think


OldGeek
989 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 409

ID Verified
Lifetime subscriber

  #717178 14-Nov-2012 16:16
Send private message

freitasm: Would you folks have use for a "PLONK" button here on Geekzone?





The world of Geekzone is quite different to Usenet, Mauricio.  With Usenet killfiles all messages were filtered by the usenet client.  With GZ this is not possible - but you could add the facility to define a killfile as part of each users profile.  This would, of course, slow the loading of GZ forum pages because of the filtering required by using a killfile.

I would be in favour of the above provided that users who had no-one in their killfile suffered no performance degradation from this feature ;-)

kiwitrc
4123 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 833
Inactive user


  #717184 14-Nov-2012 16:23
Send private message

Surely its a choice thing, if you don't like it, don't use it. I am basing this on how I envisage it working of course.

Maybe a little more info on how it will work.

 
 
 

Shop on-line at New World now for your groceries (affiliate link).
RunningMan
9184 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4834


  #717187 14-Nov-2012 16:27
Send private message

mattRSK: I feel the moderators do a good enough job of removing plonkers.


+ 1

andrewcnz
965 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 73


  #717190 14-Nov-2012 16:33
Send private message

RunningMan:
mattRSK: I feel the moderators do a good enough job of removing plonkers.


+ 1


+1

freitasm

BDFL - Memuneh
80646 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 41030

Administrator
ID Verified
Trusted
Geekzone
Lifetime subscriber

  #717193 14-Nov-2012 16:36
Send private message

OldGeek: I would be in favour of the above provided that users who had no-one in their killfile suffered no performance degradation from this feature ;-)


I don't do anything that could introduce performance degradation. I actually REMOVE stuff all the time - you don't see what's going on behind the scenes. As I said on Twitter, this week alone I have almost completely re-written the database access in the forum script, introducing a lot of new cached elements. It's faster and we're talking about ms faster, but that's what I want to achieve on each change.




Referral links: Quic Broadband (free setup code: R587125ERQ6VE) | Samsung | AliExpress | Wise | Sharesies 

 

Support Geekzone by subscribing (browse ads-free), or making a one-off or recurring donation through PressPatron.

 


Dratsab
3964 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1728

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #717212 14-Nov-2012 16:46
Send private message

networkn: I think this would be a bad idea. It just creates tension on the forums. I would be against it.

I think there's a [small] number of plonkers in these threads who only post to cause tension but are clever enough to stay within the fug.

I have to agree though, it would be fraught with difficulty and could possibly be detrimental to site performance and the readability of some threads.

EDIT: correction re freitasms comment which must've been posted just as I started to write mine :-)

 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic








Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.