I've been "reprimanded" for suggesting that this forum is biased, promotes or is otherwise involved in financial gain from "certain commercial vendors".
To this effect, I would ask that more balance information be posted, both for & against commercial & non-commercial vendors.
Case in point:
There are now dedicated areas for "borrowed" technologies like sharepoint, home server, and singing the praises of "dubious offerings" like BizSpark ("if it sound too good to be true..."), yet there has been little news on the Intrepid Ibex launch, and vendor-independent security principals does not get the prominent exposure that could be deemed responsible.
I am loathe to put my stock into any single technology (yes, even GNU/Linux), as trends are fleeting, and users must be made aware that they have alternatives & rights.
I can appreciate that maintaining the "moral integrity" of the site is a monumental task, but I would argue that public discourse should be encourage to promote vibrant and challenging debate, on all topics
#


