|
|
|
Wellington, NZ
jmacg: Did you give them a summary of what it's all about in non-technical layman's terms? Sure hope so: this thread would be incomprehensible to your average TV show researcher or producer.
anatoki:
How do you know that TCL isn't working on a fix with Google?
peroski:jmacg: Did you give them a summary of what it's all about in non-technical layman's terms? Sure hope so: this thread would be incomprehensible to your average TV show researcher or producer.
Summarised in laymans terms and focused more on the fact that they know there is an issue but won't communicate with their customers. I also referenced their ad campaign http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RIaZnK4FV-g which emphasises their speed as being superior to their competitors and also gave them a link to the NBR article which reported the ASA ruling on that campaign http://www.nbr.co.nz/article/asa-telstraclears-tc-too-mean-bill-114417
Perhaps somebody with more technical knowledge could contact them to assist.
Wellington, NZ
Screeb: Why is it OK that our service can be crippled for half a year, with no acknowledgement, just because it's supposedly being worked on months after the issue was first raised?
anatoki:Screeb: Why is it OK that our service can be crippled for half a year, with no acknowledgement, just because it's supposedly being worked on months after the issue was first raised?
So because you're having issues with one particular website, that means your [internet] service is crippled?
For the whole time I've been a member of these forums, you've always had a very negative attitude towards TCL but yet still remain a customer of TCL. Why is this?
The YouTube issues are frustrating but they're not the end of the world, and certainly not a deciding factor for me in choosing an ISP.
In regards to the service status pages - Why would ANY ISP report that they're having connectivity issues to one particular website?
anatoki:
So because you're having issues with one particular website, that means your [internet] service is crippled?
In regards to the service status pages - Why would ANY ISP report that they're having connectivity issues to one particular website?
anatoki:
For the whole time I've been a member of these forums, you've always had a very negative attitude towards TCL but yet still remain a customer of TCL. Why is this?
anatoki:Screeb: Why is it OK that our service can be crippled for half a year, with no acknowledgement, just because it's supposedly being worked on months after the issue was first raised?
So because you're having issues with one particular website, that means your [internet] service is crippled?
For the whole time I've been a member of these forums, you've always had a very negative attitude towards TCL but yet still remain a customer of TCL. Why is this?
The YouTube issues are frustrating but they're not the end of the world, and certainly not a deciding factor for me in choosing an ISP.
Referral links: Quic Broadband (free setup code: R587125ERQ6VE) | Samsung | AliExpress | Wise | Sharesies
Support Geekzone by subscribing (browse ads-free), or making a one-off or recurring donation through PressPatron.
peroski:
- If I were a manager at TCL I would report it as a fault on the website because I would see 15,000 views of a thread discussing our poor performance (that being customer service and Youtube performance)
Referral links: Quic Broadband (free setup code: R587125ERQ6VE) | Samsung | AliExpress | Wise | Sharesies
Support Geekzone by subscribing (browse ads-free), or making a one-off or recurring donation through PressPatron.
nzfatmatt: It's usable today.
4 minute 30 video at 480p, was downloaded after 3 minutes 25 of watching, so no stutter.
2 minute 25 video at 720p, Had 3 short (less than 5 seconds each) buffers as it caught up as watching.
So a lot better then the last few days, especially since there was no buffering on anything under 720p, but could always be better.
Kelburn, Wellington
|
|
|