![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
TelstraClear: Hi all, as I've noted in other threads on GZ, there's not much we can do without some specific examples that the team can test. What sites are you having trouble with? When was it? What else can you tell us about the behaviour you are experiencing.
For example, the sites mentioned in the OP are loading fine.
Thanks, Gary
TelstraClear: Hi all, as I've noted in other threads on GZ, there's not much we can do without some specific examples that the team can test. What sites are you having trouble with? When was it? What else can you tell us about the behaviour you are experiencing.
For example, the sites mentioned in the OP are loading fine.
Thanks, Gary
Please support Geekzone by subscribing, or using one of our referral links: Quic Broadband (free setup code: R587125ERQ6VE) | Samsung | AliExpress | Wise | Sharesies | Hatch | GoodSync
jermsie:phantomdb: Im on cable as well and use the paradise dns, never bothered to see how different either server was, Try using the Secondary dns server as your first, see if that changes things. i notice with a couple of sites that wont load till after 10am in the morning which is just a pain
Whats the IP for that?
[ SIGNATURE HERE ]
Please support Geekzone by subscribing, or using one of our referral links: Quic Broadband (free setup code: R587125ERQ6VE) | Samsung | AliExpress | Wise | Sharesies | Hatch | GoodSync
TelstraClear: Hi all, as I've noted in other threads on GZ, there's not much we can do without some specific examples that the team can test. What sites are you having trouble with? When was it? What else can you tell us about the behaviour you are experiencing.
For example, the sites mentioned in the OP are loading fine.
Thanks, Gary
[ SIGNATURE HERE ]
phantomdb: i have issues with www.austech.info pages wont load before 10am
TelstraClear:
These loaded fine for me. Do you have more information?
---
James Sleeman
I sell lots of stuff for electronic enthusiasts...
sleemanj:TelstraClear:
These loaded fine for me. Do you have more information?
Not with regard to the "before 10am" report you were replying to, because that's rather different I feel than the typical proxy issue.
But "loaded fine for me" is the root of the issue with reporting (potential) proxy issues
These are highly transient faults we are talking about. Your chances of reproducing the results by looking at the same page, or same site, at any given moment in time are very small.
Asking for more information is great, but what more information would you want? An exact time and date that the request was made so you can look in the logs for that request... except I can't imagine for a second that traffic through the proxy is logged to anything like that detail to identify a specific HTTP request to a specific URL at a specific time from a specific user and what the result of that was.
sleemanj:TelstraClear:
These loaded fine for me. Do you have more information?
Not with regard to the "before 10am" report you were replying to, because that's rather different I feel than the typical proxy issue.
But "loaded fine for me" is the root of the issue with reporting (potential) proxy issues
These are highly transient faults we are talking about. Your chances of reproducing the results by looking at the same page, or same site, at any given moment in time are very small.
Asking for more information is great, but what more information would you want? An exact time and date that the request was made so you can look in the logs for that request... except I can't imagine for a second that traffic through the proxy is logged to anything like that detail to identify a specific HTTP request to a specific URL at a specific time from a specific user and what the result of that was.
jermsie:sleemanj:TelstraClear:
These loaded fine for me. Do you have more information?
Not with regard to the "before 10am" report you were replying to, because that's rather different I feel than the typical proxy issue.
But "loaded fine for me" is the root of the issue with reporting (potential) proxy issues
These are highly transient faults we are talking about. Your chances of reproducing the results by looking at the same page, or same site, at any given moment in time are very small.
Asking for more information is great, but what more information would you want? An exact time and date that the request was made so you can look in the logs for that request... except I can't imagine for a second that traffic through the proxy is logged to anything like that detail to identify a specific HTTP request to a specific URL at a specific time from a specific user and what the result of that was.
Agreed.
An example a few minutes ago of a website hanging — http://techcrunch.com/2012/04/22/adobe-officially-unveils-cs6-and-its-49month-all-inclusive-creative-cloud-subscription-service/
Switched to OpenDNS servers and loaded immediately.
Go figure.
sbiddle:jermsie:sleemanj:TelstraClear:
These loaded fine for me. Do you have more information?
Not with regard to the "before 10am" report you were replying to, because that's rather different I feel than the typical proxy issue.
But "loaded fine for me" is the root of the issue with reporting (potential) proxy issues
These are highly transient faults we are talking about. Your chances of reproducing the results by looking at the same page, or same site, at any given moment in time are very small.
Asking for more information is great, but what more information would you want? An exact time and date that the request was made so you can look in the logs for that request... except I can't imagine for a second that traffic through the proxy is logged to anything like that detail to identify a specific HTTP request to a specific URL at a specific time from a specific user and what the result of that was.
Agreed.
An example a few minutes ago of a website hanging — http://techcrunch.com/2012/04/22/adobe-officially-unveils-cs6-and-its-49month-all-inclusive-creative-cloud-subscription-service/
Switched to OpenDNS servers and loaded immediately.
Go figure.
I assume you've already tried another router to elimiate your own hardware?
|
![]() ![]() ![]() |