Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 | 3
Niel
3267 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 80

Trusted

  #94907 12-Nov-2007 19:24
Send private message

To LA is 2900kbps for me 7:20 in the evening.  Compares well to the 3850kbps to the XNet server.  Rhino, where are you located?  And Rhino are you sure it is kbps and not kBps?




You can never have enough Volvos!




Rhino
17 posts

Geek
Inactive user


  #94912 12-Nov-2007 19:28
Send private message

Hey i just did another one at 7:27pm and its 668kbps to L.A and yes thats BITS not BYTES. I am located in Te Aroha, Waikato.

coffeebaron
6304 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3567

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #94919 12-Nov-2007 19:58
Send private message

Rhino: Hey i just did another one at 7:27pm and its 668kbps to L.A and yes thats BITS not BYTES. I am located in Te Aroha, Waikato.

A few things to keep in mind:
1. Xnet are migrating their customers to the new back-end over 1-2weeks, so you may not necessary have been switch over yet.
2. If there is an issue with congestion on your exchange, then there is nothing Xnet can do to fix this
3. Your issue may not be international, do a local speedtest including http://speedtest.xport.co.nz/ and see how these results compare to normal. If there is an issue locally (NZ), then that will effect international




Rural IT and Broadband support.

 

Broadband troubleshooting and master filter installs.
Starlink installer - one month free: https://www.starlink.com/?referral=RC-32845-88860-71 
Wi-Fi and networking
Cel-Fi supply and installer - boost your mobile phone coverage legally

 

Need help in Auckland, Waikato or BoP? Click my email button, or email me direct: [my user name] at geekzonemail dot com




euanandrews
1528 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted

  #94953 12-Nov-2007 21:34
Send private message

Nothing impressive here yet.....

Will give time and reserve judgement for now...

9.30 NZ time





HTPC: Silverstone LC16M | abit IP35 Pro | Intel Quad Q9400 2.5GHz | Corsair 520HX | Samsung SH-S203D DVD Writer | NVIDIA GeForce GT 240 512MB RAM | 2 x 750GB Western Digital Caviar GP HDD | 4GB DDR800 RAM | D-Link DWA-547 Rangebooster N 650 Desktop | Blackgold BGT3540 | Microsoft Remote Control & Remote Keyboard for Windows Media Center | Windows 7 64bit

Mobile: Nokia N97, Nokia N900, Samsung Galaxy S, HTC EVO 3D, iPhone 4S, Samsung Galaxy S III (current)

Rhino
17 posts

Geek
Inactive user


  #94961 12-Nov-2007 21:55
Send private message

TheBartender: Nothing impressive here yet.....

Will give time and reserve judgement for now...

9.30 NZ time



Agreed

Detruire
1788 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 84


  #94970 12-Nov-2007 23:19
Send private message

'Thirded'.

10kBps for a Wormux zip. 500kBps or 3MBps to two PCs in the US. It's nearly midnight, too! Yell




rm *


 
 
 

Support Geekzone with one-off or recurring donations Donate via PressPatron.
KnumbKnuts
43 posts

Geek


  #94995 13-Nov-2007 09:23
Send private message

9:30am Tuesday morning to LA... I'm happy - but it's the afternoon speed I want to see increase... will check later.



linw
2893 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1205


  #95126 14-Nov-2007 11:55
Send private message

Wow, my offshore speeds have just leaped up (at least during the day). Even Paris is in 4 figures!!

Very pleased - well done Xnet.

MikeGayner
183 posts

Master Geek
Inactive user


  #95234 14-Nov-2007 21:04
Send private message

Dont know about anyone else, but I had a few days of good speeds, and now I'm back to square one.








Tracing route to www.xnet.co.nz [58.28.4.10]
over a maximum of 30 hops:

  1     1 ms     1 ms     1 ms  192.168.1.1
  2    22 ms    24 ms    21 ms  ip-58-28-15-31.wxnz.net [58.28.15.31]
  3    19 ms    22 ms    21 ms  ge-1-0-0-57-jcore3.wxnz.net [58.28.13.49]
  4    20 ms    21 ms    21 ms  ge-0-1-0-akl-ae01.wxnz.net [58.28.8.4]
  5    21 ms    21 ms    23 ms  ip-58-28-160-2.wxnz.net [58.28.160.2]
  6    22 ms    22 ms    21 ms  umbriel.wxnz.net [58.28.4.10]

Trace complete.

Detruire
1788 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 84


  #95239 14-Nov-2007 21:16
Send private message

Pretty much the same here, too. Frown

Holy ****:




rm *


linw
2893 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1205


  #95241 14-Nov-2007 21:23
Send private message

I spoke too soon, too. Utter rubbish speeds at night, still.
Sydney  185
LA         208
Paris     186

 
 
 

Want to support Geekzone and browse the site without the ads? Subscribe to Geekzone now (monthly, annual and lifetime options).
grant_k

3539 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 124

Trusted

#95243 14-Nov-2007 21:44
Send private message

Everything is still rocking along nicely here (on the FLOOD plan):



In fact that is the lowest Ping I've ever had to LA Cool

Upload & Download speeds are about as good as I've ever had too.

In fact I've even beaten Cokemaster on all 3 measurements Laughing



It seems that some Xnet connections are performing better than others.
Exchange or Backhaul congestion issues maybe?

MikeGayner
183 posts

Master Geek
Inactive user


  #95249 14-Nov-2007 22:14
Send private message

It seems that some Xnet connections are performing better than others.
Exchange or Backhaul congestion issues maybe?


*sigh* No, this does not explain good local speeds. This is YET ANOTHER Xnet international speed issue. When will this ISP get it right?

Rhino
17 posts

Geek
Inactive user


  #95254 14-Nov-2007 22:35
Send private message

MikeGayner:
It seems that some Xnet connections are performing better than others.
Exchange or Backhaul congestion issues maybe?


*sigh* No, this does not explain good local speeds. This is YET ANOTHER Xnet international speed issue. When will this ISP get it right?


This ISP will have to be getting it right sooner or later, well i really hope so. Not looking forward to shopping around for a new ISP.

Sigh - 252kbps down
80kbps up
To L.A

Just did a speed test on the xnet website and it came out

435kbps down
92.7kbps up

Now that is pretty darn bad!

linw
2893 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1205


  #95260 14-Nov-2007 22:48
Send private message

It certainly isn't fit for the purpose, that's for sure. It fails miserably on the Youtube test - just unwatchable. We're getting screwed paying for a non-existent service at night.

1 | 2 | 3
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic








Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.