|
|
Trusted Lifetime subscriber
Trusted Lifetime subscriber
ID Verified
Trusted Lifetime subscriber
ID Verified Trusted Subscriber
29MS initial unloaded is pretty good considering all mobile traffic goes through Auckland and where I sit in my Christchurch home I'm getting 39MS. That download ping time under full load is pretty evident of high tower load.
RunningMan:
I wouldn't consider a 50ms latency variation excessive over that technology and distance. There's likely a sensible reason too, like extra load on a given cell site from addional users or someone hammering repeated speedtests. Radio bandwidth is a finite and shared resource so any change in the usage by any user or group of users can have an impact on every other user.
Ramblings from a mysterious lady who's into tech. Warning I may often create zingers.
MaxineN:
29MS initial unloaded is pretty good considering all mobile traffic goes through Auckland and where I sit in my Christchurch home I'm getting 39MS. That download ping time under full load is pretty evident of high tower load.
OP is testing to Auckland servers so if all mobile traffic is exchanged there anyway then there is no tromboning of traffic involved. Also it looks to me it's the uplink capacity that has dropped off so it's possible there is increase in latency on the forward path contributing to overall increase in round trip latency.
|
|
|
