Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 
MikeyPI
450 posts

Ultimate Geek


  #252353 1-Sep-2009 18:29
Send private message

But thats how wholesale works.... They more you buy the cheaper it is.

Factor in a larger customer base + lower margin = same profit margin. Hence $0 up front.

If they are overcharging by so much, then why does Apple NZ sell it for just $50 less?



littlescott
70 posts

Master Geek


  #252432 1-Sep-2009 23:32
Send private message

Yeah but I highly doubt apple would give any reasonable kind of discount for bulk.., why would they, they have the device people want and networks want to have so people will use their network.

Same deal with apple as with getting the iphone from vodafone in nz, if it's what the customer wants and there's nowhere else to get it then the customer will pay whatever the selling price is.


RockResearch
152 posts

Master Geek

Trusted

  #252454 2-Sep-2009 08:45
Send private message

I had a theory that once XT was up and running we would see a dramatic fall in the price of handsets via telco subsidys. Seems I was wrong.




Rock Research - NZ's online marketing research experts. We like to blog too.



littlescott
70 posts

Master Geek


  #252714 2-Sep-2009 19:28
Send private message

Yup, they both stated there were comfortable and weren't going to start any kind of price war unless the other one did first.

Yay for competition..


MikeyPI
450 posts

Ultimate Geek


  #252779 2-Sep-2009 22:45
Send private message

littlescott: Yup, they both stated there were comfortable and weren't going to start any kind of price war unless the other one did first.

Yay for competition..






Ummm I doubt they stated that. First Telecom would have to get authorisation to be a carrier for the iphone which they dont have, so no price war if you dont have a product to sell.


Second, that statemement if true would come close to price fixing / collusion.

Ragnor
8279 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 585

Trusted

  #252787 2-Sep-2009 23:42
Send private message

Timely dilbert this week...

Dilbert.com

 
 
 

Support Geekzone with one-off or recurring donations Donate via PressPatron.
MikeyPI
450 posts

Ultimate Geek


  #252950 3-Sep-2009 17:15
Send private message

Ha.

Actually more appropriate for the lines strike debate!

littlescott
70 posts

Master Geek


  #254198 8-Sep-2009 22:13
Send private message

MikeyPI:
littlescott: Yup, they both stated there were comfortable and weren't going to start any kind of price war unless the other one did first.

Yay for competition..






Ummm I doubt they stated that. First Telecom would have to get authorisation to be a carrier for the iphone which they dont have, so no price war if you dont have a product to sell.


Second, that statemement if true would come close to price fixing / collusion.


I was meaning in general, not specific to the iphone.  There was an article I read somewhere online around the start of the xt network where they say neither of them were interested in starting a price war unless the other one started it first, but I couldn't find it within 2 minutes of googling so I've got no proof, just my leaky memory :)

Not wanting to get into a price war isn't necessarily collusion/price-fixing, it just meants they don't want to gut their profits.


1 | 2 
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic








Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.