hi all
just wondering if anyone has herd when vodafone will roll out docsis 3.1, last i heard it was around june / july this year.
cheers
|
|
|
given they cant even support the current cable speeds of 130/100 how well do you think this roll out will go?
more to the point should they be rolling this out while they still have the huge issues with their current service?
i agree, there is a number of ongoing issues with VF cable service, lets see if they can do something, highly doubtful - yes
130 / 100 wait what
there is an upgrade path ......... its called FIBER,
[ SIGNATURE HERE ]
dualznz:
130 / 100 wait what
there are those still on the old 130 down plans and the current offering of 100 down plans
Jase2985:
given they cant even support the current cable speeds of 130/100 how well do you think this roll out will go?
more to the point should they be rolling this out while they still have the huge issues with their current service?
Assuming enough backhual is in-place, the upgrade to DOCSIS 3.1 could help hide vodafones current issues with their cable network at Existing speeds.
TBH, from that aspect im surprised they didnt take on the brute approach considering they have pushed out new modems anyway - Or are those new ones DOCSIS 3.1 compliant already?
#include <std_disclaimer>
Any comments made are personal opinion and do not reflect directly on the position my current or past employers may have.
They are using Huawei gear for Docsis 3.1 so going to assume new modems
Yes fibre is the ideal upgrade route but some of us still have to wait at least 3 years for fibre :(
yup argreed there is fibre 15 meters from my house and i dont get it till 2018, bad way to rollout the UFB, so docsis 3.1 will be fine for me, current cable is barely keeping up with my needs
DjShadow:
They are using Huawei gear for Docsis 3.1 so going to assume new modems
Yes fibre is the ideal upgrade route but some of us still have to wait at least 3 years for fibre :(
That seems like an utter waste rolling out the current spree of new modems then! surely someone at Vodafone would have looked at it with half a brain and gone, we are rolling out new modems here. Lets make it future compatible.
Last i heard, for techy folk the TC7210D was a step backwards in functionality.. Checking spec sheet it indeed only does up to 3.0
#include <std_disclaimer>
Any comments made are personal opinion and do not reflect directly on the position my current or past employers may have.
dualznz:
yup argreed there is fibre 15 meters from my house and i dont get it till 2018, bad way to rollout the UFB, so docsis 3.1 will be fine for me, current cable is barely keeping up with my needs
Why is that a bad way? They can't do everywhere at once.
Its known that cable is quite susceptible to congestion, as as nature of the technology.
Can someone tell me, is DOCSIS 3.1 superior in the regard? (I'd imagine so)
Dairyxox:
Its known that cable is quite susceptible to congestion, as as nature of the technology.
Can someone tell me, is DOCSIS 3.1 superior in the regard? (I'd imagine so)
I assume that it opens up more spectrum for use and using that spectrum more efficiently so users will benefit even if they don't go for the fastest speed.
"When the people are being beaten with a stick, they are not much happier if it is called 'the People's Stick'"
I'm kinda thinking that 3.1 is like Transmission Gully. New infrastructure, built properly. And that will have the extra effect that it takes some of the load off the existing infrastructure, thus allowing THAT to work better too.
I don't see that the mess that the current cable system is in should make us assume that 3.1 will be a mess too.
but if they cant maintain what infrastructure they have what makes you think they will be able to maintain new infrastructure and not have the same issues in the future?
The same reason I believe that the NZTA will be able to properly maintain a new Transmission Gully, compared to the shambles of the existing SH1.
Have you ever tried to keep an old car going, and compared that effort to keeping a new car going?
The two things are not really comparable. They're not laying 100% brand new network, they're (supposedly) upgrading what they already have. There is a big difference.
|
|
|