Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


freitasm

BDFL - Memuneh
80646 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 41026

Administrator
ID Verified
Trusted
Geekzone
Lifetime subscriber

#196281 25-May-2016 18:41
Send private message

Just received:

 

 

Commission files proceedings against Vodafone over misleading invoices
The Commerce Commission has filed court proceedings against Vodafone New Zealand Limited alleging it breached the Fair Trading Act by making false price representations.

 

The proceedings relate to invoices sent to customers who signed on to the ‘Red Essentials’ mobile phone plan between January and December 2014.

 

Vodafone launched the Red Essentials plan at $79 (including GST) per month in August 2013 and subsequently reduced the price to $69 in January 2014 in response to market competition.

 

The Commission alleges Vodafone did not accurately apply this $10 discount to customers who signed up to the Red Essentials plan from its introduction through to December 2014, causing misleading invoices to be sent to approximately 15,000 customers.

 

Affected customers were overcharged just over $90,000. Following the Commission’s investigation Vodafone has issued refunds to approximately 98% of affected customers.

 

As this case is before the court, the Commission cannot comment any further at this time.

 





Referral links: Quic Broadband (free setup code: R587125ERQ6VE) | Samsung | AliExpress | Wise | Sharesies 

 

Support Geekzone by subscribing (browse ads-free), or making a one-off or recurring donation through PressPatron.

 


Create new topic
Hammerer
2480 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 802

Lifetime subscriber

  #1559552 25-May-2016 19:03
Send private message

So does this mean for 11 (or 12) months from January 2014 to December 2014, 15,000 customers were overcharged $90,000 which would be $0.55 per customer per month or a total of $6.00 per customer.

 

Was it a deliberate overcharge or an error or something else?

 

 




Behodar
11089 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 6069

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #1559558 25-May-2016 19:15
Send private message

I think that's a typo; presumably the overcharge was for customers that signed up between launch and December 2013. After all, if you signed up from January 2014 then you'd presumably be on the correct price right off the bat.

 

Edit: Maths fail - that's still $6/customer!


sbiddle
30853 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 9996

Retired Mod
Trusted
Biddle Corp
Lifetime subscriber

  #1559672 25-May-2016 20:54
Send private message

I'm clearly missing something here.

 

Vodafone introduced a plan that people entered into a contract at a fixed price but then subsequently reduced the price and people who had the original price were "overcharged". How is that wrong?

 

If Vodafone had put the price up $10 and not passed the price increase on to existing customers would the Commerce Commission be taking Vodafone to court?




hio77
'That VDSL Cat'
13036 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3896

ID Verified
Trusted
Lizard Networks
Subscriber

  #1559677 25-May-2016 20:58
Send private message

sbiddle:

 

I'm clearly missing something here.

 

Vodafone introduced a plan that people entered into a contract at a fixed price but then subsequently reduced the price and people who had the original price were "overcharged". How is that wrong?

 

If Vodafone had put the price up $10 and not passed the price increase on to existing customers would the Commerce Commission be taking Vodafone to court?

 

 

 

 

This is how i read it too. walked off to dinner scratching my head wondering what i interoperated.. 





#include <std_disclaimer>

 

Any comments made are personal opinion and do not reflect directly on the position my current or past employers may have. 


radomatic
93 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 27


  #1559714 25-May-2016 21:28
Send private message

Kinda makes me wonder if it wasn't a fixed price contract... ie it was open term and the terms/price could vary. Then Vodafone charged the wrong price to those customers?

 

I don't really know, sounds like a few pieces of the puzzle missing here.


loceff13
1089 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 340


  #1559717 25-May-2016 21:34
Send private message

iirc it's an open term plan which is why it's an issue. 


Create new topic








Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.