Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


Filterer

489 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 6


#216702 9-Jul-2017 12:11
Send private message

I am looking to setup a remote IP camera in an area with no phoneline but strong 34/4g connectivity and electrical power.

 

I had planned to use an outdoor wireless IP camera connected via wifi to a router with a 3g/4g data stick in it and a vodafone sim (i have one additional data only sim on my current vodafone plan).

 

However, some research seems to indicate that the old direct APN no longer works on 3g and that its also not possible to directly access a device on 4g? Has anyone got a setup similar to this and a good way to remotely access the device - preferably through vodafone but open to other providers also.

 

 

 

Thanks

 

 

 

 





pɐǝɥ sıɥ uo ƃuıpuɐʇs

View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
 1 | 2
michaelmurfy
meow
13579 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 10910

Moderator
ID Verified
Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #1817192 9-Jul-2017 12:14
Send private message

Don't do this.

 

Cameras especially are often targets to malware and the last thing you want is having become a part of a botnet and doing a DDOS over a mobile network. Have it upload files to a remote web server or set up a VPN.





Michael Murphy | https://murfy.nz
Referral Links: Quic Broadband (use R122101E7CV7Q for free setup)

Are you happy with what you get from Geekzone? Please consider supporting us by subscribing.
Opinions are my own and not the views of my employer.




raytaylor
4076 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1296

Trusted

  #1817198 9-Jul-2017 12:34
Send private message

I cant agree more.

 

Google Mirai Botnet for more info - it specifically targets devices such as internet connected cameras.

 

Never, Ever make a port forward to a security camera or DVR recorder





Ray Taylor

There is no place like localhost

Spreadsheet for Comparing Electricity Plans Here


freitasm
BDFL - Memuneh
80646 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 41030

Administrator
ID Verified
Trusted
Geekzone
Lifetime subscriber

  #1817199 9-Jul-2017 12:36
Send private message

Please don't. Read above. If in doubt, read above.





Referral links: Quic Broadband (free setup code: R587125ERQ6VE) | Samsung | AliExpress | Wise | Sharesies 

 

Support Geekzone by subscribing (browse ads-free), or making a one-off or recurring donation through PressPatron.

 




RunningMan
9184 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4834


  #1817204 9-Jul-2017 12:56
Send private message

The OP hasn't actually said how they intend to configure this, just that a routable IP is required for access. This doesn't mean that the camera itself is either going to have a public IP, or have public facing ports. If the router is running a properly configured VPN server which is used to get access to the camera, then this should be sufficiently secure.

 

I can't answer the question about what (if any) APN will provide the required service, but lets not jump to conclusions (yet!) about how the OP intends to configure the setup.


freitasm
BDFL - Memuneh
80646 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 41030

Administrator
ID Verified
Trusted
Geekzone
Lifetime subscriber

  #1817206 9-Jul-2017 12:58
Send private message

Good point, we should know more. But preempting anything of the sorts, "port forward to a camera" is always a bad solution.





Referral links: Quic Broadband (free setup code: R587125ERQ6VE) | Samsung | AliExpress | Wise | Sharesies 

 

Support Geekzone by subscribing (browse ads-free), or making a one-off or recurring donation through PressPatron.

 


Filterer

489 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 6


  #1817211 9-Jul-2017 13:05
Send private message

RunningMan:

 

The OP hasn't actually said how they intend to configure this, just that a routable IP is required for access. This doesn't mean that the camera itself is either going to have a public IP, or have public facing ports. If the router is running a properly configured VPN server which is used to get access to the camera, then this should be sufficiently secure.

 

 

 

 

Wow that was a barrage! Yes... I am in the infosec business - so know what I am doing - simplified my setup for the purposes of the question though... lesson learnt! Although you have perhaps given me an idea to see if i can get the router to VPN back to me rather than the other way around.. downside is increased traffic in keeping the VPN alive 24x7 but it shouldn't be too many bytes.





pɐǝɥ sıɥ uo ƃuıpuɐʇs

HP

 
 
 
 

Shop now for HP laptops and other devices (affiliate link).
RunningMan
9184 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4834


  #1817259 9-Jul-2017 14:16
Send private message

Even if you got a public IP, it may still not be static, so would still require a reverse DNS service to give you a FQDN to address it. If you could put up with the overhead of keeping the VPN connection up all the time, having the VPN client at the camera end could be easier, and far less dependant on the connection type if you needed to change providers or have a fallback connection as well.


raytaylor
4076 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1296

Trusted

  #1817261 9-Jul-2017 14:18
Send private message

Most decent reputable cameras and recorders coming from china now have a cloud service that they can connect to so you can be on a dynamic and natted ip address but still connect to it without the complications of maintaining a VPN. 

 

 





Ray Taylor

There is no place like localhost

Spreadsheet for Comparing Electricity Plans Here


Filterer

489 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 6


  #1817403 9-Jul-2017 17:27
Send private message

raytaylor:

 

Most decent reputable cameras and recorders coming from china now have a cloud service that they can connect to so you can be on a dynamic and natted ip address but still connect to it without the complications of maintaining a VPN. 

 

 

Cchinese cloud server was what i was trying to avoid..





pɐǝɥ sıɥ uo ƃuıpuɐʇs

Filterer

489 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 6


  #1817405 9-Jul-2017 17:28
Send private message

RunningMan:

 

Even if you got a public IP, it may still not be static, so would still require a reverse DNS service to give you a FQDN to address it.

 

 

Most routers (including the one i was looking at) - support no-ip/dynamic ip updating services so I think I can solve that part





pɐǝɥ sıɥ uo ƃuıpuɐʇs

surfisup1000
5288 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2159


  #1817416 9-Jul-2017 17:56
Send private message

Filterer:

 

Wow that was a barrage! 

 

 

Nothing like invoking the wrath of GZ.  A fearsome foe indeed. 

 

Good advice though . . .   Isn't it great how tech people share knowledge.   

 

I sometimes wonder if there might be a 'lawyerzone' equivalent forum for kiwis?


 
 
 

Shop now at Mighty Ape (affiliate link).
MichaelNZ
1594 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 485

Trusted
Net Trust Ltd

  #1817425 9-Jul-2017 18:27
Send private message

I concur with many of the above posts. I have a public IP address range with my internet connection but I exclusively use RFC1918 and NAT for all embedded devices. Put another way, I do not connect anything directly to the internet which I don't fully understand what is going on in terms of firewalling, etc.

 

With the increasing use of IPV6 I expect this will open up a whole new Pandora's box.





WFH Linux Systems and Networks Engineer in the Internet industry | Specialising in Mikrotik | APNIC member | Open to job offers | ZL2NET


DonGould
3892 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 164


  #1817701 10-Jul-2017 11:01
Send private message

A VPN will chew ~3gb a month aiui.  Use a mikrotik router with USB dongle and you can do this quite easerly.

 

 

 

You can then, also lock the camera down to only be talking to your endpoints and nothing else, so it can't get instructions from the mother ship.

 

 

 

Have you ever wondered why the 'spy ware' is in those cameras and the benefit of it?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 





Promote New Zealand - Get yourself a .kiwi.nz domain name!!!

Check out mine - i.am.a.can.do.kiwi.nz - don@i.am.a.can.do.kiwi.nz


Filterer

489 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 6


  #1818836 10-Jul-2017 13:53
Send private message

DonGould:

 

A VPN will chew ~3gb a month aiui.  Use a mikrotik router with USB dongle and you can do this quite easerly.

 

 You can then, also lock the camera down to only be talking to your endpoints and nothing else, so it can't get instructions from the mother ship. 

 

 

 

 

3GB / month just idling? Hrrm that's too much for my purpose. Just to link back to original topic of the thread - no-one knows if it is still possible to connect to 3g/4g direct? Is this different with rural broadband?





pɐǝɥ sıɥ uo ƃuıpuɐʇs

DonGould
3892 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 164


  #1818921 10-Jul-2017 15:13
Send private message

Filterer:  3GB / month just idling? Hrrm that's too much for my purpose. 

 

If I've done my math correctly, that's about 9.7bits per second CIR, or about 1 byte every second.  It adds up.

 

 





Promote New Zealand - Get yourself a .kiwi.nz domain name!!!

Check out mine - i.am.a.can.do.kiwi.nz - don@i.am.a.can.do.kiwi.nz


 1 | 2
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic








Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.