Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


10 posts

Wannabe Geek


Topic # 11559 30-Jan-2007 21:24
Send private message

I just bought a new desktop which supposdly has HDD size of 400GB

when i went to partition HDD to install windows, max size of HDD is 130GB, according to the BIOS, capacity is 400GB

I just dont get it, I need help urgently


Create new topic
2544 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 340


  Reply # 59286 30-Jan-2007 21:56
Send private message

What "windows"? You need SP1 with XP



10 posts

Wannabe Geek


  Reply # 59287 30-Jan-2007 21:59
Send private message

windows is not the problem

im talking about the hard drive capacity showing during partitioning and under windows is not correct, i installed a 400gb hard drive, and the capacity im getting is 130gb

643 posts

Ultimate Geek


  Reply # 59291 30-Jan-2007 22:14

Linux works around BIOS limitations such as the LBA48 problem and I'd expect Windows to do the same without any BIOS updates (but a BIOS update isn't a bad idea anyway). if you have a Linux CD handy try booting off that, then open a terminal and type 'dmesg' and scroll up to see the hdd info. it will tell you how many physical bytes are on your disk regardless of partitioning and filesystems.

Alternatively plug the model number into google and see what you get.

edit: Oops I gave Windows too much credit, it won't work-around BIOSes with no LBA48 support.




Sniffing the glue holding the Internet together

2544 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 340


  Reply # 59293 30-Jan-2007 22:31
Send private message

Your bios sees 400GB so why are you so sure windows isn't the problem?!
Look here
This article describes the Microsoft Windows XP Service Pack 1 (SP1) 48-bit Logical Block Addressing (LBA) support for ATA Packet Interface (ATAPI) disk drives that can increase the capacity of your hard disk to more than the current 137 gigabyte (GB) limit.



10 posts

Wannabe Geek


  Reply # 59309 31-Jan-2007 03:24
Send private message

thanx guys, you guys were right, my stupid win 2000 is too old, i just found out when installed win 2003

2544 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 340


  Reply # 59314 31-Jan-2007 07:20
Send private message

W2k isn't stupid, it just had to learn something from SP3.

Create new topic

Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.