Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.




787 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 79

Trusted

Topic # 190662 8-Jan-2016 08:53
Send private message

Good morning all!

I'm looking at moving my storage ( 2tb x 16) to a new server.
Both servers are super micro but from different ages.

My raid card is an adaptec asr5405, currently have 2 x raid's setup.

My question, has anyone tried to move their hdd's and raid card to a new server without losing data?
Current OS is Windows 2012 R2.

Everyone iv asked is not sure as no one has been brave enough to try :)




Create new topic
1475 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 147

Subscriber

  Reply # 1465608 8-Jan-2016 09:05
Send private message

I haven't actually done this, but it should be 100%, based on the fact you have a hardware RAID controller and that is what controls the RAID set up.  If you where moving disks only to another controller, then you would have problems.

I assume your OS is stored in the array, or is it on another disk?

EDIT - actually I do vaguely remember doing this a while back, with a SCSI controller and Compaq array.  Long time ago but it did work.  Same concepts apply.



787 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 79

Trusted

  Reply # 1465615 8-Jan-2016 09:07
Send private message

cool thanks, will get it a bash.

the OS is installed on another disk... do i need to move the OS disk to the other machine or can i install a new OS on a new hdd?




 
 
 
 


2196 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 671

Subscriber

  Reply # 1465616 8-Jan-2016 09:10
One person supports this post
Send private message

Thats the stuff of nightmares. Good luck!



787 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 79

Trusted

  Reply # 1465617 8-Jan-2016 09:11
Send private message

lxsw20: Thats the stuff of nightmares. Good luck!


i know right... been planning this decision for the past 6months...




2091 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 848


  Reply # 1465669 8-Jan-2016 09:51
Send private message

As has been said already it SHOULD work - maybe.

But there is no way in hell I would go near it without a backup of that data, which could be a challenge.

How is the array cut up in windows? You doing anything funky like dynamic disks?

1475 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 147

Subscriber

  Reply # 1465680 8-Jan-2016 10:09
Send private message

BinaryLimited: cool thanks, will get it a bash.

the OS is installed on another disk... do i need to move the OS disk to the other machine or can i install a new OS on a new hdd?


Hmmm - that makes it a BIT harder and you are dependent on drivers for the RAID controller and how Windows has assigned drive letters.

1475 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 147

Subscriber

  Reply # 1465682 8-Jan-2016 10:11
One person supports this post
Send private message

wasabi2k: As has been said already it SHOULD work - maybe.

But there is no way in hell I would go near it without a backup of that data, which could be a challenge.

How is the array cut up in windows? You doing anything funky like dynamic disks?


I would have assumed the OP had a good verified recent backup of all data!

But yet good point on dynamic disks.  I assumed it was simply a hardware away assigned drive letter(s) in Windows.  Adding Dynamic Disks on top of this makes it much harder.



787 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 79

Trusted

  Reply # 1465877 8-Jan-2016 13:11
One person supports this post
Send private message

timbosan:
wasabi2k: As has been said already it SHOULD work - maybe.

But there is no way in hell I would go near it without a backup of that data, which could be a challenge.

How is the array cut up in windows? You doing anything funky like dynamic disks?


I would have assumed the OP had a good verified recent backup of all data!

But yet good point on dynamic disks.  I assumed it was simply a hardware away assigned drive letter(s) in Windows.  Adding Dynamic Disks on top of this makes it much harder.


The problem with backups is that I don't wanna spend $1500+ on hdds to back up.... blah first world problems




14289 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2590

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1465881 8-Jan-2016 13:17
3 people support this post
Send private message

So it's important enough to have on 16 disk RAID system but not important enough to back up?! As you know RAID is not a backup, you're still vulnerable to fire, theft, human error, viruses, ransomware, etc. At that data size you're looking at tape, online backups would likely be too slow to initially seed. Though you can buy 8TB disks now, so two of those is viable... starting at US$250 each so not so bad.




AWS Certified Solution Architect Professional, Sysop Administrator Associate, and Developer Associate
TOGAF certified enterprise architect
Professional photographer


gzt

10313 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1584


  Reply # 1465892 8-Jan-2016 13:30
Send private message

No idea. What is the structure of the raid(s)?

1475 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 147

Subscriber

  Reply # 1465896 8-Jan-2016 13:32
Send private message

timmmay: So it's important enough to have on 16 disk RAID system but not important enough to back up?! As you know RAID is not a backup, you're still vulnerable to fire, theft, human error, viruses, ransomware, etc. At that data size you're looking at tape, online backups would likely be too slow to initially seed. Though you can buy 8TB disks now, so two of those is viable... starting at US$250 each so not so bad.


I agree with timmmay - If the data is worth that much that you have gone to the trouble of setting up a quite complex RAID system, spend time/money backing it up.

10TB of Google Drive is only $100, do you have more data than that?  Or like @timmmay says, buy (or borrow) a 8TB drive, add it to a USB3 dock and wait a few hours (actually, days, remember the 8TB drive have a VERY VERY slow write rate, something to do with the SMR stuff.  I found this out when moving data to one).

14289 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2590

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1465900 8-Jan-2016 13:37
Send private message

10TB at 50Mbps upload would take 18 days... but if you're in a data center and can get 250Mbps in an affordable way that's only 3.5 days. I doubt many hosts would accept data that fast anyway. No matter what you do it will be a multi day effort.




AWS Certified Solution Architect Professional, Sysop Administrator Associate, and Developer Associate
TOGAF certified enterprise architect
Professional photographer


Create new topic



Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.


Geekzone Live »

Our community of supporters help make Geekzone possible. Click the button below to join them.

Support Geezone on PressPatron



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.