Windows 10 Pro — Is AV Necessary?

Forums › Microsoft Windows › Windows 10 Pro — Is AV Necessary?

TLD

695 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 153

Topic # 230417 22-Feb-2018 23:27

I am setting up my long awaited new computer, and the motherboard driver disk has kindly installed Norton Security. I managed with Windows Defender on my old Windows 10 system, and I wondering if there is a consensus here as to whether AV and Internet Security is a good thing with Windows 10. I actually have Norton on my seldom used laptop, but that still runs Windows 8.1, so I could move the account to this system, or just uninstall it. I have 156 processes running so far, but I still have a lot of stuff to install.

It's a 7900X with GTX970 (from the old system) and 64Gb RAM and a couple of Samsung 960 PRO 512Gb NVMe drives (plus a bunch of other drives not yet connected) It's only been running for a couple of hours, so I have no idea how well it is running

Trevor Dennis
Rapaura (near Blenheim)

1 | 2

5106 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1220

Moderator

Trusted

Lifetime subscriber

Reply # 1962590 22-Feb-2018 23:37

18 people support this post

Built in Defender is fine for most people.

TLD

695 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 153

Reply # 1962593 22-Feb-2018 23:46

That's what I hoped to hear. It's yet another overhead, so I'll be pleased to get rid. (in the morning)

Trevor Dennis
Rapaura (near Blenheim)

Lias

3503 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1970

Trusted

Lifetime subscriber

Reply # 1962750 23-Feb-2018 10:27

If it came to a choice between no protection and Norton/Symantec, I think I'd have to chose no protection. That aside, Windows Defender is fine, but if you ever do want to pay for AV software, avoid Norton like the plague.

Information wants to be free. The Net interprets censorship as damage and routes around it.

nunz

1249 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 256

Subscriber

Reply # 1978543 16-Mar-2018 11:31

Lias:

If it came to a choice between no protection and Norton/Symantec, I think I'd have to chose no protection. That aside, Windows Defender is fine, but if you ever do want to pay for AV software, avoid Norton like the plague.

Windows 10 defender is a PITN. It keeps changing settings after upgrades so if you are doing rmeote work or need apps accessible via firewalls be warned that they will get cut off nad go flakey. I've had to kill windows 10 firewall 5 times in last 8 hours as after updates (7.3GB of the sods in the last 24 hours) it kills my settings so icmp ping is useless and remote desktop keeps clapping out.

Bitdefender is a great AV anf light and free.

Avast is oaky.

Nod32 - my pick of choice is $70 for one year or $102 for two years. light on resources, tight on security and very effective. Their smart security is also very very good.

nunz

Lias

3503 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1970

Trusted

Lifetime subscriber

Reply # 1978553 16-Mar-2018 11:51

nunz:

Windows 10 defender is a PITN. It keeps changing settings after upgrades so if you are doing rmeote work or need apps accessible via firewalls be warned that they will get cut off nad go flakey. I've had to kill windows 10 firewall 5 times in last 8 hours as after updates (7.3GB of the sods in the last 24 hours) it kills my settings so icmp ping is useless and remote desktop keeps clapping out.

I've deployed and supported W10 Defender on hundreds of PC's without the issues you're describing.

Information wants to be free. The Net interprets censorship as damage and routes around it.

gehenna

5106 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1220

Moderator

Trusted

Lifetime subscriber

Reply # 1978814 16-Mar-2018 17:44

One person supports this post

@Lias yep same here, sounds like @nunz definitely has issues but I don't think that should turn anyone else off Defender.

freitasm

BDFL - Memuneh
61810 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 12460

Administrator

Trusted

Geekzone

Lifetime subscriber

Reply # 1978817 16-Mar-2018 18:11

One person supports this post

On the other hand I like Norton - and have been using it since my old MS DOS 2.0 days on 286 processors.

Backblaze cloud backup (personal and business) | Geekzone broadband switch | Amazon (Geekzone aff) | MightyApe (Geekzone aff) |

My technology disclosure | Business Transformation | Enterprise Content Management | Customer Relationship Management | Sharesies investment fund

quickymart

4100 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 880

Reply # 1978920 16-Mar-2018 23:24

I would like to know too - upgrading from XP (where I had AVG free) to 10 (where I have nothing so far, as far as I know)...do I need to put AVG on the 10 machine as well?

timmmay

14289 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2590

Trusted

Subscriber

Reply # 1978931 17-Mar-2018 06:20

TLD:

I have 156 processes running so far, but I still have a lot of stuff to install.

My W10 PC has 63 background processes, everything I regularly run is running. I have actively turned off services I don't need, and turned off autostart for apps I don't need in the background. One Drive, etc. I do run plenty of stuff, dropbox, Resilio Sync, etc.

AWS Certified Solution Architect Professional, Sysop Administrator Associate, and Developer Associate
TOGAF certified enterprise architect
Professional photographer

lNomNoml

983 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 202

Reply # 1978933 17-Mar-2018 07:40

I always recommend it but if you can't afford it or don't see a reason to get a dedicated AV then Defender is fine.

http://www.nsaneforums.com/topic/308953-kaspersky-trend-micro-and-microsoft-defender-on-top-in-av-comparatives-real-world-chart-022018/

Help me by buying one of my classifieds so I can become a Geekzone Supporter.

Lias

3503 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1970

Trusted

Lifetime subscriber

Reply # 1978971 17-Mar-2018 10:53

quickymart:

I would like to know too - upgrading from XP (where I had AVG free) to 10 (where I have nothing so far, as far as I know)...do I need to put AVG on the 10 machine as well?

No.. Windows 10 comes with Defender built in, and it's fine for 99% of people

Information wants to be free. The Net interprets censorship as damage and routes around it.

networkn

18760 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 5380

Trusted

Lifetime subscriber

Reply # 1979027 17-Mar-2018 14:27

I'd suggest a look at Sophos home. Also we have customers running Norton fine, eset ok, webroot.

Disagree with defender, it's a PITA. It's always running rogue. We see lots of issues with it.

Defender doesn't protect or remediate cryptolocker type attacks.

michaelmurfy

Mr Snotty
8086 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4053

Moderator

Trusted

Lifetime subscriber

Reply # 1979041 17-Mar-2018 15:43

One person supports this post

On the other hand running Defender + EMET is totally fine for most people. Also, making sure your machine is fully patched.

Most of these Cryptolocker-type malware exploit unpatched systems so don't go ignoring Windows when it needs to reboot your system.

Edit: Does it show I have not run Windows in a while? Didn't realise EMET is end of life.

Michael Murphy | https://murfy.nz
A quick guide to picking the right ISP | The Router Guide | Community UniFi Cloud Controller | Ubiquiti Edgerouter Tutorial

Lias

3503 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1970

Trusted

Lifetime subscriber

Reply # 1979118 17-Mar-2018 18:18

michaelmurfy:

On the other hand running Defender + EMET is totally fine for most people. Also, making sure your machine is fully patched.

Most of these Cryptolocker-type malware exploit unpatched systems so don't go ignoring Windows when it needs to reboot your system.

Edit: Does it show I have not run Windows in a while? Didn't realise EMET is end of life.

Windows 10 and Windows as a Service is part of the move to integrate EMET and other things into the core OS.

Information wants to be free. The Net interprets censorship as damage and routes around it.

Lias

3503 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1970

Trusted

Lifetime subscriber

Reply # 1979120 17-Mar-2018 18:23

networkn:

I'd suggest a look at Sophos home. Also we have customers running Norton fine, eset ok, webroot.

Disagree with defender, it's a PITA. It's always running rogue. We see lots of issues with it.

Defender doesn't protect or remediate cryptolocker type attacks.

I'm the opposite, I loathe Sophos, and I've just gone through removing it from every PC at work and replacing it with System Center Endpoint Protection (aka Managed version of Defender). Sophos drives me up the wall with constant false positives on non viruses.. Every single damned "Potentially unwanted application" it's removed has been wanted thank you very much.

Information wants to be free. The Net interprets censorship as damage and routes around it.

1 | 2