Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


oneilv

29 posts

Geek


#107077 6-Aug-2012 17:43
Send private message

Hi Guys,

I couldn't find a Unix category under OS so I am putting this under Linux. Please do feel free to change it if its meant to be under another category.

The Issue:

I have to access some shared folders on Unix servers but I am unable to do so using most Windows 7 and XP pro machines. Seems like there were windows updates which could've caused this issue with Samba shares.

I really want to be able to access these shares but having no luck. Also these Unix shares/ servers were setup by someone long ago and I don't have access to change anything on the server side.

If anyone could share some thoughts or something I could try on my Windows 7 clients or XP machines, please let me know.

Thanks

Oneil

Create new topic
jamesrt
1663 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 942

ID Verified
Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #668509 6-Aug-2012 18:03
Send private message

Firstly, let's get the obvious question out of the way:

Are you sure you have SAMBA running on your Unix machine?

Onto more useful things:

If it's an older Samba installation, it may not have SMB encrypted password support enabled; and if your Windows machines are configured to use only SMB encrypted connections, then...

KB Article 887429 may be able to help you here.



kama
30 posts

Geek
+1 received by user: 1


  #668527 6-Aug-2012 19:09
Send private message

Having access to the server logs would be very helpful - if possible.

oneilv

29 posts

Geek


  #668736 7-Aug-2012 10:13
Send private message

Hi Guys,

I have no details about the old unix server thats setup. This was setup long ago and James maybe you are right by saying that the encryption option was not used. I am unable to provide any kind of details about the server but the weird bit is that some machines on XP are able to access its and the rest cant !

I'll have a look at the link you've posted and see if I can turn off the authentication on a few clients and get back to you with the results.

Thanks

Oneil



jamesrt
1663 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 942

ID Verified
Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #668746 7-Aug-2012 10:25
Send private message

oneilv: the weird bit is that some machines on XP are able to access its and the rest cant !

I'll have a look at the link you've posted and see if I can turn off the authentication on a few clients and get back to you with the results.

I'm only going from a vague recollection in the back of my mind, but what you're saying does fit with what I vaguely remember.  In Windows, the "signing" (SMB v2, if memory serves) can be either optional or required (it's a registry setting, normally applied by Group Policy from a Domain) - if you've managed to get a mix of machines with some having SMB2 "required" and some SMB2 "optional", then that could cause what you're seeing.

This blog post may also be useful to you.

Create new topic








Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.