Ubuntu 20.04 LTS

Forums › Linux › Ubuntu 20.04 LTS

MikeB4

MikeB4
18775 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 12766

ID Verified

Trusted

Subscriber

#270030 20-Apr-2020 13:21

I have been using Ubuntu 20.04 LTS Beta for a wee while now and I have to say it is very good. It maybe a Beta version I am using but I have experienced zero issues to date with it, it bodes well for the final release in a few days. The device I have been running it on is a Dell i7 with 8GB RAM, 256GB SSD, Intel Wifi chip and gigabit ethernet, 17" FHD display laptop.

Here is a crazy notion, lets give peace a chance.

1 | 2

Amanzi
1354 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 332

ID Verified

Trusted

Lifetime subscriber

#2466189 20-Apr-2020 14:44

It's looking like a solid release - both on desktop and server. I've got a few servers on a mix of older Debian and Ubuntu versions that I'm looking forward to upgrading to this new LTS release.

davidcole

6099 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1465

Trusted

#2466191 20-Apr-2020 14:47

How do you force an LTS instance to update to the latest?

Previously known as psycik

Home Assistant: Gigabyte AMD A8 Brix, Home Assistant with Aeotech ZWave Controller, Raspberry PI, Wemos D1 Mini, Zwave, Shelly Humidity and Temperature sensors
Media:Chromecast v2, ATV4 4k, ATV4, HDHomeRun Dual
Server Host Plex Server 3x3TB, 4x4TB using MergerFS, Samsung 850 evo 512 GB SSD, Proxmox Server with 1xW10, 2xUbuntu 22.04 LTS, Backblaze Backups, usenetprime.com fastmail.com Sharesies Trakt.TV Sharesight

amanzi

Amanzi
1354 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 332

ID Verified

Trusted

Lifetime subscriber

#2466389 20-Apr-2020 16:18

davidcole:

How do you force an LTS instance to update to the latest?

I *think* it's something like: do-release-upgrade

nzkc

1634 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1041

#2466528 20-Apr-2020 18:36

davidcole:

How do you force an LTS instance to update to the latest?

It'll advise for update once the point 1 release comes along (e.g.: 20.04.1). Then 18.04 will advise about a new version. You're advised to wait for that .1 release.

If you really cant wait till then you will need to use:

do-release-upgrade

or possibly

do-release-upgrade -d

The -d option stipulates "allow development versions".

DamageInc

555 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 73

Lifetime subscriber

#2471374 26-Apr-2020 08:39

Yesterday I updated Lubuntu 19.10 to 20.04 lts. It was an update/upgrade via the terminal using sudo do-release-upgrade -d.

20.04 lts installed fine. Rebooted.

Distributor ID: Ubuntu
Description: Ubuntu 20.04 LTS
Release: 20.04
Codename: focal

I was a bit surprised (and I wasn't) but nothing visually changed, no new wallpaper, no new themes etc. Great that i kept intact my home partition but i suppose was expecting a new 'look'.

Visually an anti-climax. As for the system itself everything seems to be running very well.

Pop! OS

amanzi

Amanzi
1354 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 332

ID Verified

Trusted

Lifetime subscriber

#2471412 26-Apr-2020 10:32

DamageInc:

Visually an anti-climax. As for the system itself everything seems to be running very well.

I decided to do a clean install on my laptop instead of an upgrade. There are definitely some visual improvements - most are subtle but the most obvious and welcome change is the lock screen... they've finally removed the swipe up to unlock action!

Lenovo

Shop now for Lenovo laptops and other devices (affiliate link).

RapidGoat

1 post

Wannabe Geek

#2473171 29-Apr-2020 10:03

I've installed it on my main PC and it's running great, gaming is pretty straight forward and smooth as well. It's a nice experience.

Hoping for one that doesn't break randomly when it updates itself... I'm looking at you Manjaro...

qwerty123

147 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 20

#2474195 30-Apr-2020 17:09

Upgraded my 18.04 to 20.04. Upgrade went smooth, but some third party apps stopped working correctly, sorted that out by upgrading them.

Things I didn't like:

- gnome shell indicators extension now uses small icons (16x16?), therefore some app tray icons like Telegram looks odd

- Chromium moved from deb to snap. I hate snaps wholeheartedly

amanzi

Amanzi
1354 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 332

ID Verified

Trusted

Lifetime subscriber

#2474199 30-Apr-2020 17:27

qwerty123: I hate snaps wholeheartedly

Keen to hear why you hate snaps? I've avoided them in the past mostly because I didn't understand them. But now that the latest Ubuntu is doubling down on snaps I've been trying to figure out why so many people seem to hate them. From a usability point of view I can't see any visible difference between "sudo apt install chromium" and "sudo snap install chromium". I realise that they get installed in very different ways behind the scenes, but what is wrong with the snap approach over the traditional "apt install" method?

jlittle

200 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 76

ID Verified

Subscriber

#2474226 30-Apr-2020 18:21

amanzi:

what is wrong with the snap approach ?

There's a long list. For me, anti-Canonical sentiment, they're slow, and slow a system even when not being used, they bring a mess of devices and mounts, and their auto-updating can become auto-breaking.

Regards, John Little

MikeB4

MikeB4
18775 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 12766

ID Verified

Trusted

Subscriber

#2474227 30-Apr-2020 18:30

I am also giving Fedora 32 (Gnome) a whirl. I have only had it installed a day so way too early to come to any conclusions but so far so good.

Here is a crazy notion, lets give peace a chance.

Mighty Ape

Shop now at Mighty Ape (affiliate link).

zespri

424 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 94

Lifetime subscriber

#2474228 30-Apr-2020 18:31

nzkc:

You're advised to wait for that .1 release.

There is really no advise here that fits all, unless of course you know particular circumstances, of the one who asked. For enterprise, I won't be upgrading 18 to 20 for at least a year, we just migrated from 16 to 18.

For my home linux server on the other end, there is no reason not to install it right now: even if it ends up completely not working, it's not a big deal, I will just re-install 18 back. But as per this thread it seems quite stable, so the chance of that is low.

qwerty123

147 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 20

#2474239 30-Apr-2020 18:55

jlittle:

amanzi:

what is wrong with the snap approach ?

There's a long list. For me, anti-Canonical sentiment, they're slow, and slow a system even when not being used, they bring a mess of devices and mounts, and their auto-updating can become auto-breaking.

This. Also snaps with GUI don't honour system-wide themes.

Varkk

643 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 477

#2476219 4-May-2020 11:51

MikeB4:

I am also giving Fedora 32 (Gnome) a whirl. I have only had it installed a day so way too early to come to any conclusions but so far so good.

I am running Fedora 32 as well. Although using the KDE/Plasma DE. It is an updated install which started on something like Fedora 24. Running well for me

nzkc

1634 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1041

#2476279 4-May-2020 13:43

For those with a snaps aversion (I'm in this group too....cant say why exactly though...Ive tried to like them) give Pop!_OS a go. Tried it over the last few days and I'm liking its spin on Ubuntu. Seems to favour .deb and .flatpak (though from what I can tell its putting debs ahead of this).

1 | 2