Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 | 3 
lduncan
189 posts

Master Geek


  #58728 24-Jan-2007 14:08
Send private message

patdude123: I wonder if they'll charge you for the final ITU agreed 802.11n update???


What's the ITU got to do with it? Last time I checked they live in the Telco world. The 802.X standards come under the umbrella of the IEEE.






patdude123

55 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 1

ID Verified
Trusted

#58739 24-Jan-2007 14:29
Send private message

ITU/IEEE who cares? Apple have been called out by some of the most senior accountants in the USA on hiding behind accounting laws to charge for a software update. I am "over reacting" because it is the thin end of the wedge and sets a very ugly precident for future downloads.

lduncan
189 posts

Master Geek


  #58740 24-Jan-2007 14:47
Send private message

patdude123: ITU/IEEE who cares? Apple have been called out by some of the most senior accountants in the USA on hiding behind accounting laws to charge for a software update. I am "over reacting" because it is the thin end of the wedge and sets a very ugly precident for future downloads.

ITU and IEEE are VERY different organisations. I don't pretend to know anything about US accounting law. But I would think that if the Sarbanes-Oxley act didn't exist, Apple wouldn't be charging for this software, I think they are being cautious due to their existing SEC investigations.

As for setting a precident; I think that the quicktime update released today by Apple sets a very ugly precident for future downloads. ;-) Why should be be able to download them free when they can charge for it. ;-)






chiefie
I iz your trusted friend
5877 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 151

Retired Mod
Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #58741 24-Jan-2007 14:55
Send private message

Interesting enough, and yes, this is an OT.

Steve Wozniak said Steve Jobs "short-change" him of the work he did to reduce the number of processor in Atari's Breakout. Read this...

And at the moment, there seems to be at least 3 court cases for Apple at the moment, Cisco vs Apple, OPTi Inc vs Apple, and now Quantum Research vs Apple for click-wheel on iPod... and Steve Jobs is being queried by the US Authorities

So... mmm I have my thoughts on Steve Jobs as a person... and do question about his leadership and his ethique though.. but I reserve those thoughts to myself. :-)




Internet is my backyard...

 

«Geekzone blog: Tech 'n Chips Takeaway» «Personal blog: And then...»

 

Please read the Geekzone's FUG

 


Fossie
1240 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted

  #58742 24-Jan-2007 14:59
Send private message

I read that in iWoz....Steve Jobs was also the one who only wanted two expansion slots in one of their early systems whereas steve wozniak wanted 8. (woz won :D)


chiefie
I iz your trusted friend
5877 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 151

Retired Mod
Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #58743 24-Jan-2007 15:01
Send private message

Woz is the brain, Jobs is just a salesman... And Jobs is very good at promoting sale... as evidented with iPod and "iPhone"...




Internet is my backyard...

 

«Geekzone blog: Tech 'n Chips Takeaway» «Personal blog: And then...»

 

Please read the Geekzone's FUG

 


1 | 2 | 3 
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic








Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.