Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


Filter this topic showing only the reply marked as answer View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 | 3
Batman
Mad Scientist
30014 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 6217

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #1299001 6-May-2015 12:49
Send private message

If China issues a ban on our meats fruits tourism advertising and buying houses here then we are in trouble. Especially Auckland home owners.



stevenz
2802 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 125


  #1299105 6-May-2015 14:09
Send private message

They seem to be largely in favour of boosting the economy with little thought to the people within it in the belief that "she'll be right".

This means keeping China, India and the USA happy at pretty much any cost.





Batman
Mad Scientist
30014 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 6217

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #1299109 6-May-2015 14:19
Send private message

the richest people in India can afford to buy our entire country.



Batman
Mad Scientist
30014 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 6217

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

JimmyH
2898 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1554


  #1299390 6-May-2015 20:09
Send private message

Ummm.... as far as trade goes, India is currently close to irrelevant to us. China and the US are not. Our living standards depend hugely on them, and it would be pretty silly to gratuitously antagonise either of the countries which are so crucial to our long term future in return for ..... not much. No government fit to govern would be that daft.

Of course MFAT can't "order" MPs not to meet someone. However, we do have a critical trade relationship with China, so it's hardly surprising that the agency charged with managing our foreign relations and promoting trade would be keen to stop government gratuitously MPs antagonising them.

Geektastic
18009 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 8465

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #1299521 6-May-2015 22:26
Send private message

JimmyH: Ummm.... as far as trade goes, India is currently close to irrelevant to us. China and the US are not. Our living standards depend hugely on them, and it would be pretty silly to gratuitously antagonise either of the countries which are so crucial to our long term future in return for ..... not much. No government fit to govern would be that daft.

Of course MFAT can't "order" MPs not to meet someone. However, we do have a critical trade relationship with China, so it's hardly surprising that the agency charged with managing our foreign relations and promoting trade would be keen to stop government gratuitously MPs antagonising them.


 

And not that it is that likely, but China could invade NZ militarily in about 10 seconds flat and it's fairly unlikely anyone would do more than complain loudly about it for fear of escalation.





 
 
 

Want to support Geekzone and browse the site without the ads? Subscribe to Geekzone now (monthly, annual and lifetime options).
Batman
Mad Scientist
30014 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 6217

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #1299526 6-May-2015 22:30
Send private message

they don't need to militarily invade. just send all their peasants onto our shores and we will be overrun in a matter of days.

frankv
5705 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3666

Lifetime subscriber

  #1299611 7-May-2015 07:57
Send private message

They don't need to invade militarily... they're buying the country piecemeal anyway.

scuwp
3927 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2510


  #1299637 7-May-2015 08:35
Send private message

joker97: they don't need to militarily invade. just send all their peasants onto our shores and we will be overrun in a matter of days.


Yep, the way evolution is going I think my grand kids will be learning English as a second language. Who needs a war to take over the world, just breed en-mass.   




Lazy is such an ugly word, I prefer to call it selective participation



heylinb4nz
656 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 141
Inactive user


  #1299697 7-May-2015 09:47
Send private message

MikeB4: Of course NZ Government decisions are influenced by other Governments especially extremely important trading partners.



Makes you wonder what influence is obtained by those who lend billions of dollars to NZ (ie the international bankers). If a mere trading partner has influence.


MikeB4
MikeB4
18775 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 12766

ID Verified
Trusted
Subscriber

  #1299702 7-May-2015 09:54
Send private message

heylinb4nz:
MikeB4: Of course NZ Government decisions are influenced by other Governments especially extremely important trading partners.



Makes you wonder what influence is obtained by those who lend billions of dollars to NZ (ie the international bankers). If a mere trading partner has influence.



"mere trading partner" that is a huge understatement. China is capable of taking all we produce, your standard of living and my standard of living are very much tied to that"mere trading partner".




Here is a crazy notion, lets give peace a chance.


 
 
 
 

Shop now for Dell laptops and other devices (affiliate link).
heylinb4nz
656 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 141
Inactive user


  #1299768 7-May-2015 11:41
Send private message

MikeB4:
heylinb4nz:
MikeB4: Of course NZ Government decisions are influenced by other Governments especially extremely important trading partners.



Makes you wonder what influence is obtained by those who lend billions of dollars to NZ (ie the international bankers). If a mere trading partner has influence.



"mere trading partner" that is a huge understatement. China is capable of taking all we produce, your standard of living and my standard of living are very much tied to that"mere trading partner".


If that's the case our government should be looking to get out of bed with international banks and focus on maximizing our trading with China and other countries, there should be no need to borrow money.

MikeB4
MikeB4
18775 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 12766

ID Verified
Trusted
Subscriber

  #1299770 7-May-2015 11:44
Send private message

heylinb4nz:
MikeB4:
heylinb4nz:
MikeB4: Of course NZ Government decisions are influenced by other Governments especially extremely important trading partners.



Makes you wonder what influence is obtained by those who lend billions of dollars to NZ (ie the international bankers). If a mere trading partner has influence.



"mere trading partner" that is a huge understatement. China is capable of taking all we produce, your standard of living and my standard of living are very much tied to that"mere trading partner".


If that's the case our government should be looking to get out of bed with international banks and focus on maximizing our trading with China and other countries, there should be no need to borrow money.


Nothing wrong with borrowing money it is essential for growth, the key just like it is for personal borrowing is to keep it manageable.




Here is a crazy notion, lets give peace a chance.


frankv
5705 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3666

Lifetime subscriber

  #1299784 7-May-2015 12:06
Send private message

MikeB4: Nothing wrong with borrowing money it is essential for growth, the key just like it is for personal borrowing is to keep it manageable.


I dispute that it is *essential* for growth. But agree that sometimes it is a good idea.

However, this borrowing is paid for overseas, so that Kiwis may see little (or no) benefit from the growth.


Hammerer
2480 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 802

Lifetime subscriber

  #1300065 7-May-2015 18:10
Send private message

nakedmolerat:
What happen to freedom of association?


Those who become MPs have the right to freedom of association but when they become MPs their office has restrictions on what is considered to be acceptable behaviour. A similar restriction probably exists in the political parties so an MP can't be a member of another political party.

While the Bill of Rights 1990 has freedom of association as article 17 it has no definition or elaboration so I'm not sure how we'd know how it would be applied here.

nakedmolerat:
In fact they were told to report to mfat if they receive any invitation... Why?


It means something different to say that "they were told to report to mfat" when "they were only told to report it, i.e. the invitation, to MFAT.

nakedmolerat:
Falun Gong or Falun Dafa (literally means "Dharma Wheel Practice" or "Law Wheel Practice") is a Chinese spiritual practice that combines meditation and qigong exercises with a moral philosophy centered on the tenets of Truthfulness, Compassion, and Forbearance (Chinese: 真、善、忍) - wikipedia


I didn't realise that forbearance was important to Falun Gong. I've seen them follow Chinese tourists around in NZ to bombard them with posters and messages over loud speakers. There may not be much compassion for the NZ neighbours at some spots who have to put with the Falun Gong noise most days of the year.

[Edited to remove duplicate quote]

1 | 2 | 3
Filter this topic showing only the reply marked as answer View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic








Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.