Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 | 3
frankv
5705 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3666

Lifetime subscriber

  #2277053 15-Jul-2019 15:09
Send private message

Rikkitic:

 

never mind its portrayal of women (though they were piloting aircraft and attacking Fort Knox).

 

 

Wait! You say that wasn't accurate?

 

 




Lias
5655 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3978

ID Verified
Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #2277217 15-Jul-2019 18:26
Send private message

MikeB4:

 

I don't see any issue. The franchise needed to be modernised.

 

 

There is a modernised version, and his name is Sterling Archer :-P.

 

 

 

 

 

[Mod edit (MF): no need for foul language]





I'm a geek, a gamer, a dad, a Quic user, and an IT Professional. I have a full rack home lab, size 15 feet, an epic beard and Asperger's. I'm a bit of a Cypherpunk, who believes information wants to be free and the Net interprets censorship as damage and routes around it. If you use my Quic signup you can also use the code R570394EKGIZ8 for free setup. Opinions are my own and not the views of my employer.


Journeyman
1205 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1236


  #2277219 15-Jul-2019 18:29
Send private message

I'm confused. She's not taking over as Bond but she is taking over as 007. James Bond the character is synonymous with the franchise. If James Bond is not going to be part of the franchise past this film, what is the franchise about anymore? Just any old spy called 007? Will the James Bond franchise now be known as the 007 franchise? Maybe the movie will provide all the answers in due course, but right now I can't see how it is going to work going forward.




freitasm
BDFL - Memuneh
80654 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 41048

Administrator
ID Verified
Trusted
Geekzone
Lifetime subscriber

  #2277253 15-Jul-2019 19:42
Send private message

Journeyman:

 

I'm confused. She's not taking over as Bond but she is taking over as 007. James Bond the character is synonymous with the franchise. If James Bond is not going to be part of the franchise past this film, what is the franchise about anymore? Just any old spy called 007? Will the James Bond franchise now be known as the 007 franchise? Maybe the movie will provide all the answers in due course, but right now I can't see how it is going to work going forward.

 

 

It may be confusing but some old theories have been around to explain why "James Bond" changed during the years. Basically James Bond would be a codename, assigned to agents when they started working. That's why so many different Bond existed over the 50 something years of the franchise so far. 007 is just a license to kill and James Bond was assigned that - like 006 was assigned to someone else. 007 could be assigned to anyone, not necessarily Bond. 

 

Yes, let the movie explain.





Referral links: Quic Broadband (free setup code: R587125ERQ6VE) | Samsung | AliExpress | Wise | Sharesies 

 

Support Geekzone by subscribing (browse ads-free), or making a one-off or recurring donation through PressPatron.

 


networkn
Networkn
32864 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 15455

ID Verified
Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #2277260 15-Jul-2019 20:05
Send private message

If this was done because they interviewed a variety of Men and Women, and she was the truly best person for the job, then so be it, but if this was done for any other reason, then shame on them.

 

 


Journeyman
1205 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1236


  #2277351 15-Jul-2019 21:15
Send private message

freitasm:

 

Journeyman:

 

I'm confused. She's not taking over as Bond but she is taking over as 007. James Bond the character is synonymous with the franchise. If James Bond is not going to be part of the franchise past this film, what is the franchise about anymore? Just any old spy called 007? Will the James Bond franchise now be known as the 007 franchise? Maybe the movie will provide all the answers in due course, but right now I can't see how it is going to work going forward.

 

 

It may be confusing but some old theories have been around to explain why "James Bond" changed during the years. Basically James Bond would be a codename, assigned to agents when they started working. That's why so many different Bond existed over the 50 something years of the franchise so far. 007 is just a license to kill and James Bond was assigned that - like 006 was assigned to someone else. 007 could be assigned to anyone, not necessarily Bond. 

 

Yes, let the movie explain.

 

 

Sure, but according to that theory, the codename James Bond has passed along with the code number 007. The direction they're taking now seems to be that the codename doesn't pass along with the number - they're separated. 

 

While a lot of people complain about Bond being a misogynist, I actually like that he's a flawed character. He's arrogant, he's a womaniser, a heavy drinker and smoker, he's self-destructive (more so in the Daniel Craig era) and he doesn't follow rules. He's not a nice guy and he's the guy that is protecting Britain from the baddies. That's far more interesting than if Bond was a boy scout.

 

Hopefully the new 007 will have an interesting character who will be more than the same old "badass babe who doesn't take no guff from a man!" trope.


 
 
 

Stream your favourite shows now on Apple TV (affiliate link).
freitasm
BDFL - Memuneh
80654 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 41048

Administrator
ID Verified
Trusted
Geekzone
Lifetime subscriber

  #2277354 15-Jul-2019 21:43
Send private message

Agree with the characterisation.

 

I guess we have to reserve comments until after the movie is released.





Referral links: Quic Broadband (free setup code: R587125ERQ6VE) | Samsung | AliExpress | Wise | Sharesies 

 

Support Geekzone by subscribing (browse ads-free), or making a one-off or recurring donation through PressPatron.

 


old3eyes
9158 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1364

Subscriber

  #2277503 15-Jul-2019 22:21
Send private message

She'll most likely be called Bond. Jane Bond. 007.




Regards,

Old3eyes


Handle9
11925 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 9676

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #2277515 15-Jul-2019 23:41
Send private message

This is all pretty daft. It's pretty clear from the article that the 007 being referred to is taking over as 007 from Daniel Craig's James Bond, not making James Bond a woman. It's a fun plot twist, not a new Bond.

Craig came back for the cash. There will be a reboot after this one with a new Bond. Save the snowflake outrage til then.

dafman
4054 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2652

Trusted

  #2277568 16-Jul-2019 08:53
Send private message

MikeB4:

frankv:

 

TheMantis:

 

Not only female but black too. Ticking all the boxes. Producers should go for the trifecta and make the character LGBTQ as well.

 

 

And in a wheelchair.

 

 

 

 

 

 

why not?

 

... and I'm picking it would be a pretty kick*ss wheelchair at that!

ranjayryan
13 posts

Geek
+1 received by user: 7


  #2277578 16-Jul-2019 09:08
Send private message

Can they make an Anime version as well? What about our fellow Anime fans? Don't they need our support (money) too? 


 
 
 

Want to support Geekzone and browse the site without the ads? Subscribe to Geekzone now (monthly, annual and lifetime options).
Fred99
13684 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 10018


  #2277582 16-Jul-2019 09:16
Send private message

networkn:

 

If this was done because they interviewed a variety of Men and Women, and she was the truly best person for the job, then so be it, but if this was done for any other reason, then shame on them.

 

 

 

 

Well it would have been done because - money - to attract investors / punters.

 

Shame on capitalism. They used misogynistic stereotypes to their advantage,  then shifted away from it when it wasn't. 


surfisup1000
5288 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2159


  #2277610 16-Jul-2019 09:29
Send private message

Fred99:

 

networkn:

 

If this was done because they interviewed a variety of Men and Women, and she was the truly best person for the job, then so be it, but if this was done for any other reason, then shame on them.

 

 

 

 

Well it would have been done because - money - to attract investors / punters.

 

Shame on capitalism. They used misogynistic stereotypes to their advantage,  then shifted away from it when it wasn't. 

 

 

Yes, it is disgusting how film producers just want to make money. 


MikeB4
MikeB4
18775 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 12766

ID Verified
Trusted
Subscriber

  #2277618 16-Jul-2019 09:31
Send private message

@dafman yep, reference the wheelchair in Johnny English





Here is a crazy notion, lets give peace a chance.


surfisup1000
5288 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2159


  #2277624 16-Jul-2019 09:39
Send private message

I have no problem with a female 007 ... as long as it is a good movie. 

 

For sometime now, Hollywood prioritises special effects over a decent story. It should be the other way around. 


1 | 2 | 3
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic








Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.