[Devils Advocate]
I wouldn't be willing to pay as much to see <insert your favourite artist> as you because I'm not as much or a fan as you - nothing unfair about that(?). Within the ranks of the fans there are people willing to pay more than you - obviously the price they are willing to pay indicates they are are bigger fans than you, just as the price I am willing to pay indicates I am less of a fan than you.
[/Devils Advocate]
When demand exceeds supply, it becomes an internet lottery to see who goes, and that brings out the profit-seeking-scalpers (aka demand pricers) which diminish your odds even more. With "dynamic" prices, customers start self regulating. I think we can all agree that it is fairer that the artist reaps the additional profits than some scalping speculator.
If artists genuinely think otherwise (and most don't demonstrate this with actions), they can always announce additional shows, so demand pricing isn't activated and scalpers are left high & dry (like U2 on their last Akl shows - I laughed at the scalpers desperately trying to flog off tickets outside the gates).
The beauty of the loss of record profits is that artist have more motivation than ever to put on as many shows as they can. Demand pricing as a free-market way for the artist to balance work to profit ratios.


