![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
What's the downside of actually just logging in? An account doesn't need any personal information and you could user a 'burner' email address if you were really worried.
Earbanean:
An account doesn't need any personal information
First name, last name, email address, country, postcode, date of birth and gender are all required fields.
Behodar:
Earbanean:
An account doesn't need any personal information
First name, last name, email address, country, postcode, date of birth and gender are all required fields.
But none of them actually need to be true. i.e. they don't validate that info in any way.
Behodar:
Earbanean:
An account doesn't need any personal information
First name, last name, email address, country, postcode, date of birth and gender are all required fields.
Just fill it with random crap. None of it is needed and the more people that lie the less valuable their data harvesting is.
It annoys me that as a hard copy subscriber of The Post newspaper, Stuff have chosen subscriber logins to be by email address, rather than subscriber number. I mean if you get a physical paper delivered to a household, it's going to be read by more than one person. Should be true of an online subscription as well. As it is, my email address is tied to the subscription, so if my wife logins in, it then doesn't allow access to paywalled items. I complained to them about the error of their ways and they did at least respond, but didn't agree of course 😬
Opinions are my own and not the views of my employer.
They have been trialing this for some time. Random articles would have the 'login'-wall while others didn't. I did wonder if they'd eventually move to requiring it for everything.
Firefox here so no simply using Firefox is not a solution. Although to be fair I've not seen this on Firefox mobile...yet.
|
![]() ![]() ![]() |