![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
jaymz: If it was me i would go for a diesel engine, and the reason for that is this:
Oil companies and car companies know that there will one day be no more oil to mine from the ground.
Huge advances are being made in producing bio fuels that can be used in the current vehicle infrastructure.
It is simple economy, what would cost more? changing the entire infrastruction from fuel based to an electrical system, or simply put that money into producing a fuel that can be used in the current infrastructure.
Lazy is such an ugly word, I prefer to call it selective participation
Mattnzl: - Prius batteries don't have much capacity even new, and tests on cars with half nackered batteries reveal a very small change in mileage.
BraaiGuy: BMW M3. It uses less fuel than a Prius.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=badoMjA_rW0
Samsung Note20 Ultra, on 2degrees
alasta: The problem that I have with hybrids is that the reliance on regenerative braking assumes that you're going to be driving the thing mostly in stop/start situations.
skyplonk: If I was going brand new I would get a turbo diesel. Not sure if I could face the embarrassment of driving a hyrbrid. The eco-worriers might get the wrong idea! Haha
|
![]() ![]() ![]() |