|
|
|
Forgetting about cars for the moment, what about lorries.
I'm sure I read somewhere lately that battery powered lorries are a non-started for the foreseeable future - not powerful enough to drive a large lorry and can't run for say 8 hours continuously.
SJB:
Forgetting about cars for the moment, what about lorries.
I'm sure I read somewhere lately that battery powered lorries are a non-started for the foreseeable future - not powerful enough to drive a large lorry and can't run for say 8 hours continuously.
I think thats ok. Humans cannot go 100% green. The Earth manages CO2 and other gases, remember these are natural. Our problem is the level of excess. If we became extremely green car transport wise, there will always be sectors that cannot manage that, but if the emissions were at a level that the Earth can manage, job done.
Lorry wise, use trains which will be more efficient per kg of freight. Lorries for the last mile. Probably lots of innovative ideas to reduce freight.
tdgeek:
Lorry wise, use trains which will be more efficient per kg of freight. Lorries for the last mile. Probably lots of innovative ideas to reduce freight.
You'd need to lay an awful lot more railway track to only use lorries for local deliveries in NZ.
Personally I think it's already too late and we have passed the point of no return. I'm just glad I'm not going to be around to see the results.
tdgeek:
Some good points. People also seem to keep reducing the discussion to ICE vs electric. There are other possible solutions for specific needs. Fuel cells, hydrogen, external combustion (Stirling). Fuel cells make electricity from hydrogen but it can also be burned directly as a fuel with minor modifications to the engine. I don't know if Stirling lorries have been tried, but I do know Stirling engines were successfully trialled in busses. Of course, they require the burning of some kind of fuel so they might not solve the carbon problem but they do show that there are different ways of approaching things.
This article from MIT suggests that hydrogen could well be the non-polluting fuel of the future once a good source for it is found. Ironically, one of the best short-term sources is gas, so the government may well have been a little premature in banning exploration for that. I don't know. The idea of using it to produce hydrogen hasn't been raised as far as I know.
In the longer term hydrogen on a reasonable scale can be produced from sea water and solar energy, both of which we have an abundance of. It is also a good way of storing energy, since solar can be used to produce it and it can then be used in fuel cells or burned in generators. One big problem with hydrogen is, like batteries, lower energy density than fossil fuels but I believe that can be worked around in the longer term. Hydrogen seems to be a good fuel option for powering ICE machines doing heavy work.
Plesse igmore amd axxept applogies in adbance fir anu typos
SJB:
tdgeek:
Lorry wise, use trains which will be more efficient per kg of freight. Lorries for the last mile. Probably lots of innovative ideas to reduce freight.
You'd need to lay an awful lot more railway track to only use lorries for local deliveries in NZ.
Personally I think it's already too late and we have passed the point of no return. I'm just glad I'm not going to be around to see the results.
Yes, its more a general comment. If rail was on the main trunk lines and other larger towns, that would stop a truck army on the roads at night.
Software Engineer
(the practice of real science, engineering and management)
A.I. (Automation rebranded)
Gender Neutral
(a person who believes in equality and who does not believe in/use stereotypes. Examples such as gender, binary, nonbinary, male/female etc.)
...they/their/them...
“We’ve arranged a society based on science and technology, in which nobody understands anything about science technology. Carl Sagan 1996
How so? Everyone is entitled to an opinion. Even a dumb one.
Plesse igmore amd axxept applogies in adbance fir anu typos
MileHighKiwi:
The Greens want us to be carbon neutral by 2030 or something but to do that would mean killing off the entire NZ cattle herd, banning all non electric vehicles, closing down most manufacturing etc. It would plunge many New Zealanders into poverty and joblessness.
I must have missed that policy statement
Rikkitic:How so? Everyone is entitled to an opinion. Even a dumb one.
“We’ve arranged a society based on science and technology, in which nobody understands anything about science technology. Carl Sagan 1996
Dingbatt: Standby for incoming.....
You just dropped a hand grenade into the echo chamber.
MileHighKiwi: Would love to hear some statistical evidence to counter my suspicision that we're pissing into the wind while countries like India and China triple their energy demands and build hundreds of coal plants.
As the alternatives improve (see above), the excuses for doing nothing become ever lamer. Pointing to the air travel of others is particularly childish. Musk may well be a self-centred jerk who flies in a private plane, but Shaw is merely one passenger on a commercial airliner. He may be a hypocrite, but if you are going to accuse him of that you need to include the reasons for every flight he has made, the benefits, if any, that resulted from those flights that could not have been obtained from teleconferencing, and travel alternatives that could have been used in place of the flights. Otherwise you are just making cheap shots that don't mean anything.
Plesse igmore amd axxept applogies in adbance fir anu typos
|
|
|