Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


Filter this topic showing only the reply marked as answer View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | ... | 275 | 276 | 277 | 278 | 279 | 280 | 281 | 282 | 283 | 284 | 285 | ... | 433
dafman
4054 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2652

Trusted

  #2303060 21-Aug-2019 14:59
Send private message quote this post

networkn:

Once Upon a time in Hollywood.

 

Well acted. Went to it as I have been a fan of Tarantino movies in the past. Didn't read anything about it and as a result spent the entire movie wondering what the hell was going on. Walked out with less clue than when I went in.

 

Wasn't till I mentioned my confusion to my FIL that he told me the premise that (some of it) made sense.

 

Everyone was raving about it afterward, but they were all a lot older than me and alive back then so perhaps that was part of it.

 

I don't really know how to rate it, perhaps 6.5/10

 

Just saw this last night. Am a fan of Tarantino and this is his best film to date. 10/10.

 

DiCaprio and Pitt were in outstanding form, clearly loving the characters and dialogue they had been given to work with.

 

I can see how the film may lose something if you weren't aware of the event it was shadowing. However, I did know and I totally bought into it.

 

Tarantino's only minor misstep was to give a short speaking role to kiwi stuntwoman Zoe Bell. She's a great stunt talent but, unfortunately, she showed us that she can't act in Hateful Eight - something which was sadly reinforced in this film



xpd

xpd
Geek of Coastguard
14116 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4579

Retired Mod
ID Verified
Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #2306590 27-Aug-2019 09:09
Send private message quote this post

Actually got time to watch some stuff this past weekend........

 

Ma - Not a bad thriller, main actress usually does lighthearted/comedy roles so was interesting to see her change for this :)  7/10

 

Brightburn - Damien (The Omen) crossed with Superman is probably best way to describe - neat horror, even I jumped at one point. 7/10

 

Alita Battle Angel - Really enjoyed this one, story not anything fantastic but overall was well made 7/10

 

 

 

 





XPD / Gavin

 

LinkTree

 

 

 


Lizard1977
2134 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 627

ID Verified

  #2306616 27-Aug-2019 09:58
Send private message quote this post

Once upon a time in...Hollywood - 6/10

 

I don't think I would describe myself as a fan of Tarantino, but I have enjoyed a number of his films - Pulp Fiction obviously, Reservoir Dogs, Kill Bill, Django Unchained, but I didn't really enjoy Inglorious Basterds and I never got round to watching Hateful Eight.  Still, I saw the trailer and I liked the idea of diCaprio and Pitt together, so I gave it a look.

 

My initial reaction at the end of the film was... what?  I summed it up for my wife when I got home (she wasn't interested in seeing it) as "a long film where nothing much really happens."  And it is looong - nearly 3 hours.

 

I get Tarantino as auteur, and I quite enjoy some of the seemingly pointless monologues/dialogues in his previous films (esp. Pulp Fiction), but there were long stretches in this film where it's really hard to discern any value from the extended shots or sequences.  I was actively watching to see if these drawn out shots would build or add to the story, but I couldn't really pick it.  Maybe that's just me, and more astute film students would get it, but I suspect if there is some deeper meaning it's probably lost on the majority of the audience.

 

I was aware before going in to the theatre about the background historical element, but I found it didn't really help me, and in some cases I was distracted because I was waiting for the historical "event" to happen.  (I'm being cryptic to avoid spoilers).

 

I read a few reviews afterwards, and it helped me a little to understand what I had seen.  For instance, the title has (at least) two meanings.  The first is a reference to the westerns (e.g. Once upon a time in the west), but the second is the "fairy tale" reference, which is a pretty good way to describe the story style.  However, even despite this the film still seems to have little point to it all.  Other reviews have described it as a love letter to the golden era of Hollywood, and that may be the case, but for me it still didn't redeem the film enough.

 

Plot/story aside, di Caprio and Pitt are great, as is Margot Robbie.  It's got a good soundtrack (as always), but for me it seems to lack any reason or driving force.  It feels like a lazy drive through someone's nostalgia...




Handsomedan
7770 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 7408

ID Verified
Trusted
Subscriber

  #2306652 27-Aug-2019 11:02
Send private message quote this post

I watched  Red Sea Diving Resort on NZ Netflix last week. 

 

 

 

I'd seen a documentary on the very subject a few weeks ago and thoroughly enjoyed it...even saying, "How is there not a movie about that?"

 

 

 

Basically, it's a story of 1980's Ethiopian Jews being smuggled to the Holy Land by Mossad agents under the guise of running a Red Sea resort in the north of Sudan. 

 

 

 

It stars Chris Evans and a solid supporting cast and tells the story well, if not glossing over some of the plot and not really diving too deeply into the actual resort itself, which by all accounts was run entirely by Govt agents from Israel. 

 

 

 

A fairly compelling watch, nonethless...8/10 from me. 





Handsome Dan Has Spoken.
Handsome Dan needs to stop adding three dots to every sentence...

 

Handsome Dan does not currently have a side hustle as the mascot for Yale 

 

 

 

*Gladly accepting donations...


dafman
4054 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2652

Trusted

  #2306905 27-Aug-2019 18:00
Send private message quote this post

Lizard1977:

 

Once upon a time in...Hollywood - 6/10

 

I don't think I would describe myself as a fan of Tarantino, but I have enjoyed a number of his films - Pulp Fiction obviously, Reservoir Dogs, Kill Bill, Django Unchained, but I didn't really enjoy Inglorious Basterds and I never got round to watching Hateful Eight.  Still, I saw the trailer and I liked the idea of diCaprio and Pitt together, so I gave it a look.

 

My initial reaction at the end of the film was... what?  I summed it up for my wife when I got home (she wasn't interested in seeing it) as "a long film where nothing much really happens."  And it is looong - nearly 3 hours.

 

I get Tarantino as auteur, and I quite enjoy some of the seemingly pointless monologues/dialogues in his previous films (esp. Pulp Fiction), but there were long stretches in this film where it's really hard to discern any value from the extended shots or sequences.  I was actively watching to see if these drawn out shots would build or add to the story, but I couldn't really pick it.  Maybe that's just me, and more astute film students would get it, but I suspect if there is some deeper meaning it's probably lost on the majority of the audience.

 

I was aware before going in to the theatre about the background historical element, but I found it didn't really help me, and in some cases I was distracted because I was waiting for the historical "event" to happen.  (I'm being cryptic to avoid spoilers).

 

I read a few reviews afterwards, and it helped me a little to understand what I had seen.  For instance, the title has (at least) two meanings.  The first is a reference to the westerns (e.g. Once upon a time in the west), but the second is the "fairy tale" reference, which is a pretty good way to describe the story style.  However, even despite this the film still seems to have little point to it all.  Other reviews have described it as a love letter to the golden era of Hollywood, and that may be the case, but for me it still didn't redeem the film enough.

 

Plot/story aside, di Caprio and Pitt are great, as is Margot Robbie.  It's got a good soundtrack (as always), but for me it seems to lack any reason or driving force.  It feels like a lazy drive through someone's nostalgia...

 

 

For me, this was a solid 10/10. The best film I have seen in recent history and, in my view, possibly Tarantino's masterpiece. And a lot of reviews I have subsequently read agree with me.

 

But I've also read a similar amount of reviews that align with yours. It seems this is one of those rare films that genuinely divides opinion across viewers - either 'masterpiece' or 'so so', with few in the middle. 


pctek
807 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 157
Inactive user


  #2307968 29-Aug-2019 17:51
Send private message quote this post

Lizard1977:

 

Once upon a time in...Hollywood - 6/10

 

 

 

I get Tarantino as auteur, and I quite enjoy some of the seemingly pointless monologues/dialogues in his previous films (

 

 

I've always thought the whole point of his movies was loads of action and gratuitous violence.

 

Dialogues?

 

This one, googled the synopsis, sounds rather boring for one of his.

 

Django was quite good, ditto Inglorious, utterly silly stories but that's not why we watch them, is it.

 

 


 
 
 

Shop now at Mighty Ape (affiliate link).

SJB

SJB
2945 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2287
Inactive user


  #2308293 30-Aug-2019 10:22
Send private message quote this post

Fantastic Beasts The Crimes of Grinelwald 6/10

 

This movie and it's predecessor are a disappointment. Eddie Redmayne who plays the lead character adopts a very irritating acting style and the CGI action overwhelms any storyline which in this move is overly complicated.


gehenna

8667 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3883

Moderator
Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #2308295 30-Aug-2019 10:26
Send private message quote this post

Yeah I'm not a fan of Redmayne.  His choices rub me the wrong way in most of his roles.  He was bloody awful in Jupiter Ascending, an already bad movie made worse by his weird vocal choices.


FineWine
3115 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2447

Trusted
Nurse (R)
Lifetime subscriber

  #2308298 30-Aug-2019 10:31
Send private message quote this post

The Long Good Friday (1980) 7/10

 

London gangster wars with Bob Hoskins and Helen Mirren. A bit dated now but still a great plot and acting.





Whilst the difficult we can do immediately, the impossible takes a bit longer. However, miracles you will have to wait for.


CokemonZ
1106 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 313


  #2308299 30-Aug-2019 10:32
Send private message quote this post

John Wick 3.

 

If you liked the other 2, you will love this. more and more over the top.

 

If you didn't you'll hate this. more and more over the top.

 

 

 

For me - awesome, loved it. Mythology is getting super weird, but very 'in world'.


CokemonZ
1106 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 313


  #2308300 30-Aug-2019 10:33
Send private message quote this post

SJB:

 

Fantastic Beasts The Crimes of Grinelwald 6/10

 

This movie and it's predecessor are a disappointment. Eddie Redmayne who plays the lead character adopts a very irritating acting style and the CGI action overwhelms any storyline which in this move is overly complicated.

 

 

Yeah - this movie overall was a fail. Pretty disappointed.

 

Even my wife who loves (LOVES) all things HP was let down. She thought it was 'ok' which really means horrible.


 
 
 

Shop now at Mighty Ape (affiliate link).

SJB

SJB
2945 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2287
Inactive user


  #2308310 30-Aug-2019 10:50
Send private message quote this post

FineWine:

 

The Long Good Friday (1980) 7/10

 

London gangster wars with Bob Hoskins and Helen Mirren. A bit dated now but still a great plot and acting.

 

 

We would consider the acting a bit wooden now but it really is one of the best of it's generation. Bob Hoskins was outstanding being himself.


SJB

SJB
2945 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2287
Inactive user


  #2308316 30-Aug-2019 10:55
Send private message quote this post

gehenna:

 

Yeah I'm not a fan of Redmayne.  His choices rub me the wrong way in most of his roles.  He was bloody awful in Jupiter Ascending, an already bad movie made worse by his weird vocal choices.

 

 

Hard to believe the same guys made The Matrix. Time to retire.


freitasm
BDFL - Memuneh
80658 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 41070

Administrator
ID Verified
Trusted
Geekzone
Lifetime subscriber

  #2308487 30-Aug-2019 15:45
Send private message quote this post

@SJB:

 

@gehenna:

 

Yeah I'm not a fan of Redmayne.  His choices rub me the wrong way in most of his roles.  He was bloody awful in Jupiter Ascending, an already bad movie made worse by his weird vocal choices.

 

 

Hard to believe the same guys made The Matrix. Time to retire.

 

 

Girls now: Wachowski sisters.





Referral links: Quic Broadband (free setup code: R587125ERQ6VE) | Samsung | AliExpress | Wise | Sharesies 

 

Support Geekzone by subscribing (browse ads-free), or making a one-off or recurring donation through PressPatron.

 


SJB

SJB
2945 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2287
Inactive user


  #2308494 30-Aug-2019 16:05
Send private message quote this post

freitasm:

 

@SJB:

 

@gehenna:

 

Yeah I'm not a fan of Redmayne.  His choices rub me the wrong way in most of his roles.  He was bloody awful in Jupiter Ascending, an already bad movie made worse by his weird vocal choices.

 

 

Hard to believe the same guys made The Matrix. Time to retire.

 

 

Girls now: Wachowski sisters.

 

 

Yes I read that somewhere a while back.


1 | ... | 275 | 276 | 277 | 278 | 279 | 280 | 281 | 282 | 283 | 284 | 285 | ... | 433
Filter this topic showing only the reply marked as answer View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic








Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.