|
|
|
gzt:
"I'm hungry"? What happens then?
JWR:
Which would you prefer?
Nanny state or Islamic state?
Plesse igmore amd axxept applogies in adbance fir anu typos

joker97: what about "I need to poo" ?

Geektastic: Right up there with the current nonsense in the UK of an African on a Rhodes Scholarship to Oxford complaining about a statue of Rhodes at Oriel....
Matthew
Plesse igmore amd axxept applogies in adbance fir anu typos
Geektastic: Right up there with the current nonsense in the UK of an African on a Rhodes Scholarship to Oxford complaining about a statue of Rhodes at Oriel....
Here is a crazy notion, lets give peace a chance.
Rikkitic: 'Bugger' was clever, funny and not malicious - everything this ad was not.
Fred99:Rikkitic: 'Bugger' was clever, funny and not malicious - everything this ad was not.
The "Bugger" TV ad drew 120 formal complaints to the ASA. That in 1999, where the lame morally outraged masses didn't rally together on social media. However it clearly did offend some people.
Most TV ads aren't clever or funny, "malicious" is kind of subjective. If that ad was in "bad taste", then perhaps the problem is with social mores giving rise to the peculiar anthropomorphism and of pet animals by city-slickers - who are happy to eat meat, but not to kill. Unless it's taking their kids fishing of course, dragging sprats and spotties out of the water to suffer slow protracted death by suffocation for no purpose at all except "for fun", then posting stuff on facebook about how the makers of that ad probably got their kicks as a kid by pulling the wings off flies.
|
|
|