|
|
|
MediMap hack: Pharmacists implement manuel system to maintain safe care levels
I wonder how Manuel feels about this?
SirHumphreyAppleby: Not a NZ example (https://www.boredpanda.com/home-improvement-star-zachery-ty-bryan-handed-jail-sentence-after-arrest/), nor a headline, but how is 0.15 double 0.08? Also, unnecessary censorship. "The 44-year-old pleaded guilty to driving with a blood alc*hol content (BAC) of 0.15 percent or higher, double the .08 percent legal limit."
RunningMan:
I wonder how Manuel feels about this?
Que?
Sometimes I just sit and think. Other times I just sit.
And RNZ have used GZ as their substitute editor and corrected it now 🤣
eracode:
¿Que?
Fixed that for you.
Plesse igmore amd axxept applogies in adbance fir anu typos
Rikkitic:
eracode:
¿Que?
Fixed that for you.
Thanks. I was actually intending to do that but then forgot to look at my text editor. 😀
Sometimes I just sit and think. Other times I just sit.
NZ Herald has a good article - or so it seemed. The headline is not a clickbait. But the opinion is empty:

Referral links: Quic Broadband (free setup code: R587125ERQ6VE) | Samsung | AliExpress | Wise | Sharesies
Support Geekzone by subscribing (browse ads-free), or making a one-off or recurring donation through PressPatron.
The opinion must be "because I said so".
freitasm:
NZ Herald has a good article - or so it seemed. The headline is not a clickbait. But the opinion is empty:
I was under the impression that the mark of a civilised society was returning your supermarket trolleys to a trolley bay, rather than leaving them scattered haphazardly through out the carpark and neighbouring streets..
There was something in the local paper the other day about how someone found a random street sign in a park so he picked it up with the intention of dropping it into the council. A not-so-good samaritan concluded that he was stealing it and decided the best course of action was to go straight to assault.
That's certainly not a mark of a civilised society.
Behodar:
There was something in the local paper the other day about how someone found a random street sign in a park so he picked it up with the intention of dropping it into the council. A not-so-good samaritan concluded that he was stealing it and decided the best course of action was to go straight to assault.
That's certainly not a mark of a civilised society.
Certainly not a sign of a civilised society.
Sometimes I just sit and think. Other times I just sit.
Giving someone reversing into a parallel park the space to do it rather than driving forward into the park yourself is the mark of a civilised society.
gzt:
The article addresses none of that. It's just an engagement piece. It's overly long for that. "Reversing into a parking space is more environmentally friendly" lol. Engage!
Reversing into, and leaving, a perpendicular space adjacent to a footpath blows exhaust into the faces of pedestrians.
Sometimes I just sit and think. Other times I just sit.
Reverse parking was a requirement of many of the worksites I went to before I retired, so now reverse parking comes naturally.
It is safer to drive forward out of a carpark as you have a much better view of any approaching vehicles.
Opponents claim that reversing into a park creates a bigger hindrance to other vehicles than driving forward into a park. True, but driving out forwards is safer and causes much less of a hindrance than reversing out blind.
As previously noted, reversing cameras have made reversing into a park much quicker and easier.
Whichever way you park, entering or exiting a park can hinder other vehicles.
I think the biggest problem is the impatience of many drivers. They can't bear to want to wait for a few seconds to let the other guy complete their manoeuvrer.
|
|
|