nickb800:
I agree the website should do a better job explaining it's limitations, but I don't think the limitations are a reason for it to be taken down.
So despite it not being able to cope with common ownership structures, distinguish between people with the same names and revealing more than what it needs to do in order to actually fulfil the purpose that it supposedly exists to serve, let alone effectively and diminishes privacy to anyone clumsily caught out by these flaws doesn't warrant some sort of intervention isn't a good enough reason for it to at the very least get shuttered until it can actually do any of those things correctly?
Well... if I can't convince you at this point then I probably won't be able to.


