![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Plesse igmore amd axxept applogies in adbance fir anu typos
Rikkitic: I'm glad you got some of it back. Hopefully it was enough to cover some of your costs.
richms:Rikkitic: I'm glad you got some of it back. Hopefully it was enough to cover some of your costs.
Hardly, sounds like he has spent hours on it so far. Perhaps it will make a revision of the terms of trade to include that he can charge for all that wasted time in future tho.
Kyanar:richms:Rikkitic: I'm glad you got some of it back. Hopefully it was enough to cover some of your costs.
Hardly, sounds like he has spent hours on it so far. Perhaps it will make a revision of the terms of trade to include that he can charge for all that wasted time in future tho.
Against someone like this the terms of trade are irrelevant. You aren't getting it back regardless of how much extra you slap on it.
jmh: Update: The police called me. Turns out he has a criminal record under several aliases with time in prison. He has over 200 crimes against him dating back decades. The police say I'm lucky to get some of it back (he's paid $300). They say they would struggle to prove this in court and I got the impression that they felt the risk wasn't worth the time and work involved. So I've agreed for it to be filed, and accepted the lesson I have learned. I was able to give a better description than they have on file, so that's something.
nigelj:jmh: Update: The police called me. Turns out he has a criminal record under several aliases with time in prison. He has over 200 crimes against him dating back decades. The police say I'm lucky to get some of it back (he's paid $300). They say they would struggle to prove this in court and I got the impression that they felt the risk wasn't worth the time and work involved. So I've agreed for it to be filed, and accepted the lesson I have learned. I was able to give a better description than they have on file, so that's something.
A bounced cheque from a closed account isn't proof enough?
I'd be demanding that the police leave the file open (they will want the file closed in some form to improve numbers), on the assumption that he would be charged with other crimes in the future if more complaints are laid by others. A lack of interest in someone, allegedly that well known to the Police is pretty disappointing.
jmh: ... Amazingly, he paid another $25 today.
Sideface
jmh:nigelj:jmh: Update: The police called me. Turns out he has a criminal record under several aliases with time in prison. He has over 200 crimes against him dating back decades. The police say I'm lucky to get some of it back (he's paid $300). They say they would struggle to prove this in court and I got the impression that they felt the risk wasn't worth the time and work involved. So I've agreed for it to be filed, and accepted the lesson I have learned. I was able to give a better description than they have on file, so that's something.
A bounced cheque from a closed account isn't proof enough?
I'd be demanding that the police leave the file open (they will want the file closed in some form to improve numbers), on the assumption that he would be charged with other crimes in the future if more complaints are laid by others. A lack of interest in someone, allegedly that well known to the Police is pretty disappointing.
I did raise that but the police said that it was hard to prove to the satisfaction of the court that he intentionally wrote a dud cheque. I thought it was pretty weak too. He said that because I had provided a service, I could probably take a civil case, but given that the amount owed is now around $100 it's probably not worth it. Amazingly, he paid another $25 today.
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |